Establishing Visualization Grading Scale on LESS Cholecystectomy
A Grading System for Laparoscopic Visualization and Predicting Factors That Affect Visualization Level During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies: A Prospective, Single Group, Open Label Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Essential to laparoscopic operations is adequate visualization. Unfortunately there is no grading system to assess the degree or quality of visualization. The primary objective of the project is to develop a laparoscopic visualization scoring system. We also intend to investigate the effects of neuromuscular blockade agents on visualization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedJuly 28, 2017
July 1, 2017
2.8 years
October 1, 2014
July 26, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Laparoscopic Visualization Score assessment
Start to end of LESS Cholecystectomy
Secondary Outcomes (4)
pneumoperitoneum volume
start to end of LESS cholecystectomy
factors influencing visualization
start to end of LESS cholecystectomy
Degrees of visualization
start to end of LESS cholecystectomy
postoperative pain
every day until 7 days after LESS cholecystectomy
Study Arms (1)
Cholecystectomy visualization
EXPERIMENTALAll patients will undergo a standard single site cholecystectomy and will have their operation recorded and scored for visualization.
Interventions
Patients undergo a standard removal of the gallbladder through a single incision at the umbilicus will have their operation recorded and graded according to a scale that is established for this study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent
- years of age and older
- All patients deemed to have a clinical and surgical indication to undergo a LESS cholecystectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Breastfeeding
- BMI\>35
- Serious comorbidities precluding a LESS cholecystectomy
- Known or suspected neuromuscular disorders impairing neuromuscular function
- Allergies to muscle relaxants, anesthetics or narcotics utilized for this study
- A (family) history of malignant hyperthermia
- A contraindication for neostigmine administration
- Chronic opioid use
- Prolonged QT syndrome
- Creatinine \>2.0
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Florida Hospital Tampa Bay Divisionlead
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
FloridaHTBD
Tampa, Florida, 33613, United States
Related Publications (7)
Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R, Wayand WU. A diagnostic score to predict the difficulty of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy from preoperative variables. Surg Endosc. 1998 Feb;12(2):148-50. doi: 10.1007/s004649900616.
PMID: 9479730BACKGROUNDNguyen NT, Longoria M, Gelfand DV, Sabio A, Wilson SE. Staged laparoscopic Roux-en-Y: a novel two-stage bariatric operation as an alternative in the super-obese with massively enlarged liver. Obes Surg. 2005 Aug;15(7):1077-81. doi: 10.1381/0960892054621062.
PMID: 16105411BACKGROUNDStijn de Buck, Johan van Cleynenbreugel, Indra Geys, Thomas Koninckx, Philippe R Koninck, Paul Suetens. A System to Support Laparoscopic Surgery by Augmented Reality Visualization. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention; 691-8, 2001.
BACKGROUNDCamanni M, Bonino L, Delpiano EM, Migliaretti G, Berchialla P, Deltetto F. Laparoscopy and body mass index: feasibility and outcome in obese patients treated for gynecologic diseases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):576-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
PMID: 20619751BACKGROUNDMcDougall EM, Figenshau RS, Clayman RV, Monk TG, Smith DS. Laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum: impact of body habitus. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994 Dec;4(6):385-91. doi: 10.1089/lps.1994.4.385.
PMID: 7881141BACKGROUNDMulier JP, Dillemans B, Van Cauwenberge S. Impact of the patient's body position on the intraabdominal workspace during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1398-402. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0785-8. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
PMID: 20054583BACKGROUNDSimanski , R. Kahler, B. Pohl, R. Hofmockel, R. Friedrich, B. P. Lampe Measurement and control of neuromuscular blockade and depth of anaesthesia. Proceedings of the European Control Conference, Cambridge/UK. 2003.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexander S. Rosemurgy, MD
Florida Hospital Tampa Bay Division
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director HPB Surgery, GERD Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2014
First Posted
October 15, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share