Study Stopped
procedure is too demanding
Comparison of Medical Results of Testicular Sperm Extraction by Conventional Surgery and Microsurgical Track
Microsperm
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
5
Brief Summary
To compare mobile sperm extraction rate between microTESE and conventional TESE in 18-50 years-old men with non obstructive azoospermia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 27, 2023
CompletedJanuary 5, 2024
January 1, 2024
3.7 years
May 13, 2016
January 2, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
sperm extraction
positivity (presence, coded 1) or negativity (absence, coded 0) of the sperm extraction, based on possibility of having at least 1 mobile sperm
time of surgery
Study Arms (2)
conventional TESE
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional multiple TESE is performed under general or locoregional anesthesia. Through a small vertical incision in the median scrotal raphe, the skin, dartos muscle, and tunica vaginalis are opened to expose the tunica albuginea. The tunica albuginea is ordinarily incised for about 4 mm at the medium region of the testis. A similar biopsy will be systematically performed in the contralateral testis. The biopsy is analyzed by the biologist in the theatre in order to precise if sufficient spermatozoa is retrieved.
micro TESE
EXPERIMENTALMicrodissection TESE is also performed under general or locoregional anesthesia. After the tunica albuginea is opened widely along the antiepididymal border, direct examination of the testicular parenchyma is performed under the operating microscope. An attempt is made to identify individual seminiferous tubules that are larger, more opaque and whiter than other tubules in the testicular parenchyma, which are considered to contain spermatozoa. The extracted tubules are analyzed by the biologist in the theatre. The procedure is terminated when sperm are retrieved or further biopsy is thought likely to jeopardize the blood supply of the testis. If all tubules are seen to have an identical morphological appearance, at least three samples (upper, middle, and lower) are obtained. A similar microTESE will be systematically performed in the contralateral testis
Interventions
usual procedure for sperm extraction
procedure of extraction is performed under the operating microscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- consecutive spermograms (with ±3 months interval) confirming absence of sperm (azoospermia)
- diagnosis of non-obstructive azoospermia on the basis of a complete history, physical examination, endocrine profile, ultrasound and chromosomal analysis
You may not qualify if:
- History of previous testicular surgery, except orchiopexy for undescended testis.
- Monochordy
- Ultrasound revealed testicular nodule
- Y chromosome microdeletions type AZFa and b.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
University Hospital
Bordeaux, 33 000, France
University Hospital
Lille, 59037, France
University Hospital
Paris, 75015, France
University Hospital
Rouen, 76031, France
University Hospital
Toulouse, 31 059, France
Related Publications (1)
Tsujimura A, Matsumiya K, Miyagawa Y, Tohda A, Miura H, Nishimura K, Koga M, Takeyama M, Fujioka H, Okuyama A. Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study. Hum Reprod. 2002 Nov;17(11):2924-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.11.2924.
PMID: 12407050BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric Huyghe, MD, PhD
U H Toulouse
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2016
First Posted
May 16, 2016
Study Start
April 26, 2017
Primary Completion
January 15, 2021
Study Completion
December 27, 2023
Last Updated
January 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01