Treatment of Corneal Abrasions With Topical Tetracaine
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Corneal abrasion (CA) is one of the most common eye injuries, accounting for 10% of eye-related emergency visits.1 A 1985 survey showed that around 3% of all visits to US general practitioners were for corneal abrasions. In addition, in 2008, approximately 27,450 work-related eye injuries and illnesses occurred that caused missed time from work.1Due to the large number of nerve endings even small corneal injuries can produce significant pain. The discomfort is typically most pronounced in the first 24-48 hours, and in many cases showed a loss in time at work and disruption of daily activities. The current standard of care in the emergency department includes topical analgesia and antibiotics with a change to oral analgesics upon discharge. Despite the ineffectiveness of oral analgesics in treating CA pain, most physicians do not prescribe topical analgesics based on standard medical teaching. The study's aim is to further investigate the role of tetracaine in the outpatient management of CA utilizing models already established to ensure safety. To accomplish this investigators will employ a prospective, double blind, randomized control model to compare undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride to normal saline in patients presenting to the ED with uncomplicated corneal abrasions. Tetracaine will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of preservative-free, undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride (a total of 1.5 mL or approximately 50 drops will be provide to avoid overuse). Saline will also be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, plastic bullets. Follow up visits or calls will be provide at 48 hour to reevaluate symptoms an asses the patients perceived pain using VAS provided in participant introduction packet during the informed consent process.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jun 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 13, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2018
CompletedMay 13, 2016
May 1, 2016
2 years
May 2, 2016
May 10, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain assessed with Visual Analog Scale
Participants receiving both arms of the study (Tetracaine and Normal Saline) will be provided with a Visual Analog Scale in there study welcome packet. Scales will be completed at the end of 48 hours and submitted at follow up visit or mailed in if visit is deferred.
Up to 24 months
Study Arms (2)
Tetracaine Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients with he primary diagnosis of corneal abrasion will be treated with ophthalmic tetracaine. Tetracaine will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of preservative-free, undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride (a total of 1.5 mL or approximately 50 drops will be provide to avoid overuse). Patients will be instructed to use 1-2 drops of up to every 30 min for pain control over a 48 hour period with subsequent followup with the ophthalmologist.
Normal Saline Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients with the primary diagnosis of corneal abrasion will be treated with normal saline eye drops. Normal saline will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of normal saline. Patients will be instructed to use 1-2 drops of up to every 30 min for pain control over a 48 hour period with subsequent followup with the ophthalmologist.
Interventions
1-2 drops to affected eye every 15-30 minutes over 24-48 hours as need
1-2 drops to affected eye every 15-30 minutes over 24-48 hours as need
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients \> 18 years of age with a primary diagnosis of uncomplicated corneal abrasion presenting to NYMH emergency department
You may not qualify if:
- Patients\<18 years of age with complicated corneal abrasions or other eye injuries
- Present more than 36 hours after their initial injury
- Had previous eye surgery or cataracts
- Wear contact lenses or if their injury was caused from contact lens wear
- Had injured both eyes
- Unable to give informed consent
- Current infectious or chemical conjunctivitis
- Have a grossly contaminated foreign body in their eye
- Currently suffering from an ocular infection
- Currently or previously had herpes keratitis
- Allergies to tetracaine or similar medication classes
- Had an injury requiring urgent ophthalmologic evaluation; including penetrating eye injuries, large or complicated corneal abrasions, or injuries causing a significant disruption of visio)
- Unable to attend follow up in 48 hours
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
New York Methodist Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, 11215, United States
Related Publications (5)
Waldman N, Densie IK, Herbison P. Topical tetracaine used for 24 hours is safe and rated highly effective by patients for the treatment of pain caused by corneal abrasions: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;21(4):374-82. doi: 10.1111/acem.12346.
PMID: 24730399BACKGROUNDPruet CM, Feldman RM, Kim G. Re: "topical tetracaine used for 24 hours is safe and rated highly effective by patients for the treatment of pain caused by corneal abrasions: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial". Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;21(9):1062-3. doi: 10.1111/acem.12470. No abstract available.
PMID: 25269590BACKGROUNDSwaminathan A, Otterness K, Milne K, Rezaie S. The Safety of Topical Anesthetics in the Treatment of Corneal Abrasions: A Review. J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):810-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.069. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
PMID: 26281814BACKGROUNDSegal KL, Fleischut PM, Kim C, Levine B, Faggiani SL, Banerjee S, Gadalla F, Lelli GJ Jr. Evaluation and treatment of perioperative corneal abrasions. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:901901. doi: 10.1155/2014/901901. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
PMID: 24672709RESULTAlgarni AM, Guyatt GH, Turner A, Alamri S. Antibiotic prophylaxis for corneal abrasion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 27;5(5):CD014617. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014617.pub2.
PMID: 35622535DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Laura Melville, M.D.
New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2016
First Posted
May 13, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
October 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 13, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Plan to share data of pain perception and complications of patients