Affective Responses in Neurological Rehabilitation
A Preliminary Study on Acute Affective Responses Focussing on Differences Between Physical Therapy and Robotic Assisted Gait Training
1 other identifier
observational
16
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Using a single blind within-subject design, 16 patients with neurological disorders were randomly exposed to two different treatments: physical therapy and robotic assisted gait training. Both before and after the treatments, a self-report Mood Survey Scale (MSS) was used to assess the effects on the treatment on distinct affective states. The subscales of the MSS were tested for pre-post changes and different effects between treatments with non-parametric tests.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Dec 2012
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2016
CompletedMay 10, 2016
May 1, 2016
Same day
April 22, 2016
May 9, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of subscales of mood survey scale from pre to post treatment
30-60 minutes
Study Arms (1)
G
All participants were randomly exposed to two different treatments: * Conventional physical therapy (no specific device used) * Robotic assisted gait training (Lokomat, Hocoma AG, Switzerland) We consider the study as observational, since the both interventions of the study (physical therapy, robotic assisted gait training) did not change in the patients' usual therapy plan, as they received both interventions daily. We only added diagnostic interventions to assess the affective responses.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with neurological disorders
You may qualify if:
- voluntary participation
- neurological incident
You may not qualify if:
- lack of communication ability
- interference of consciousness
- inability to speak German language
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Martin Kopp, Prof
Univeryity of Innsbruck
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof Martin Burtscher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2016
First Posted
May 10, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 10, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05