NCT02765035

Brief Summary

The aim of this post-market study is to confirm that the microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee components (C-Leg 3 and C-Leg 4) in comparison to mechanical knee joints can bring additional benefit to the users primarily on level walking and secondarily in safety, stair and hill mobility, activities of daily living, satisfaction and preference.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 2, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 6, 2016

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 30, 2018

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 14, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 14, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

May 2, 2016

Results QC Date

July 16, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 17, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in 6 Minute Gait Test

    A measure of walking endurance, the distance walked in meters after 6 minutes.

    Baseline and after acclimation period (30-90 days after fitting)

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Change in 10 Meter Gait Test

    Baseline and after acclimation period (30-90 days after fitting)

  • Change in Stairs Assessment Index (SAI)

    Baseline and after acclimation period (30-90 days after fitting)

  • Change in Hill Assessment Index (HAI)

    Baseline and after acclimation period (30-90 days after fitting)

  • Change in Four Step Square Test (FSST)

    Baseline and after acclimation period (30-90 days after fitting)

  • Change in Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale

    Baseline and after acclimation period (30-90 days after fitting)

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

C-Leg 3, then C-Leg 4

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants are first fitted with a C-Leg 3, receive physical therapy, acclimate for 90 days and are then assessed in the clinic. They then receive a C-Leg 4, receive additional physical therapy and acclimate for 30 days after which they are again assessed in the clinic.

Device: C-Leg 4Device: C-Leg 3

C-Leg 4, then C-Leg 3

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants are first fitted with a C-Leg 4, receive physical therapy, acclimate for 90 days and are then assessed in the clinic. They then receive a C-Leg 3, receive additional physical therapy and acclimate for 30 days after which they are again assessed in the clinic.

Device: C-Leg 4Device: C-Leg 3

Interventions

C-Leg 4DEVICE

Microprocessor Controlled Knee

C-Leg 3, then C-Leg 4C-Leg 4, then C-Leg 3
C-Leg 3DEVICE

Microprocessor Controlled Knee

C-Leg 3, then C-Leg 4C-Leg 4, then C-Leg 3

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Person is \>18 years old.
  • Person is a unilateral transfemoral or knee-disarticulation amputee with stabilized residual limb.
  • Person is a K2, K3 or K4 ambulator based on Medicare Functional Classification Level (MFCL).
  • Person is currently fitted with a prosthesis using a non-microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee for at least 6 months.
  • Person was never fitted with microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee joint.
  • Person is willing and able to independently provide informed consent.
  • Person is willing to comply with study procedures.
  • Person wears prosthesis daily and ≥ 8 hours/day.
  • Person is walking on average 1km/day.
  • Person is walking not slower than 3km/h (\~0.8m/s) (based on 10m walk test conducted during recruiting).
  • Person is walking on level ground in a step over step manner.

You may not qualify if:

  • Person is under 18 years of age.
  • Person who weighs more than 136kg.
  • Person who weighs less than 50kg.
  • Person who is pregnant.
  • Person has a history of chronic skin breakdown on the residual limb.
  • Person has conditions that would prevent participation and pose increased risk (e.g. unstable cardiovascular conditions that preclude physical activity such as walking).
  • Person falls ≥ once a week due to the reasons that could not be corrected by the new prosthesis (for ex. problems with vestibular system).
  • Person is using under arm axillary crutches or walker.
  • Person in an emergency, life threatening situation.
  • Person is unwilling/unable to follow instructions.
  • Person who is not available to follow the entire study protocol.
  • Person who is participating in another study or intends to participate in another study during this study duration.
  • Person who cannot personally provide their consent.
  • Person who is not wearing prosthesis 8hours/day on average.
  • Person who has a score on 10m walk test less than 3km/h (\~0.8m/s) (based on 10m walk test conducted during recruiting).
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center SKA Zicksee

Sankt Andrä am Zicksee, Burgenland, 7161, Austria

Location

University Leuven

Pellenberg, 3212, Belgium

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds and Injuries

Limitations and Caveats

From 11 subjects that participated in the study, only 7 followed protocol. From post-hoc power analysis, 22 subjects would be required for 80% power to detect a difference of 35.9m (standard deviation = 30.3m) in the 6MWT. Patients were aware that a walking speed of greater than 0.8 m/s was a prerequisite for study participation, which could have lead to bias (elevated baseline measurement) and explain the small change in observed walking speed with C-Leg 3 and C-Leg 4 compared to baseline.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Director of Clinical Research and Services Vienna
Organization
Otto Bock Healthcare GmbH

Study Officials

  • Stephan Domayer, Prim.Dr.

    Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2016

First Posted

May 6, 2016

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

May 30, 2018

Study Completion

May 30, 2018

Last Updated

October 14, 2021

Results First Posted

October 14, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data for primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available within one year of study completion.

Locations