C-Leg 3 and C-Leg 4 Study in Transfemoral Amputees
A Randomized, Blinded, Cross-over Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Functional Mobility and Satisfaction of the Microprocessor Controlled Prosthetic Knee Component C-Leg 4 in Transfemoral Amputees
1 other identifier
interventional
18
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
The aim of this post-market study is to confirm that the microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee components (C-Leg 3 and C-Leg 4) in comparison to mechanical knee joints can bring additional benefit to the users primarily on level walking and secondarily in safety, stair and hill mobility, activities of daily living, satisfaction and preference.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 14, 2021
CompletedOctober 14, 2021
September 1, 2021
2.2 years
May 2, 2016
July 16, 2021
September 17, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in 6 Minute Gait Test
A measure of walking endurance, the distance walked in meters after 6 minutes.
Baseline and after acclimation period (30-90 days after fitting)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change in 10 Meter Gait Test
Baseline and after acclimation period (30-90 days after fitting)
Change in Stairs Assessment Index (SAI)
Baseline and after acclimation period (30-90 days after fitting)
Change in Hill Assessment Index (HAI)
Baseline and after acclimation period (30-90 days after fitting)
Change in Four Step Square Test (FSST)
Baseline and after acclimation period (30-90 days after fitting)
Change in Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale
Baseline and after acclimation period (30-90 days after fitting)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
C-Leg 3, then C-Leg 4
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are first fitted with a C-Leg 3, receive physical therapy, acclimate for 90 days and are then assessed in the clinic. They then receive a C-Leg 4, receive additional physical therapy and acclimate for 30 days after which they are again assessed in the clinic.
C-Leg 4, then C-Leg 3
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are first fitted with a C-Leg 4, receive physical therapy, acclimate for 90 days and are then assessed in the clinic. They then receive a C-Leg 3, receive additional physical therapy and acclimate for 30 days after which they are again assessed in the clinic.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Person is \>18 years old.
- Person is a unilateral transfemoral or knee-disarticulation amputee with stabilized residual limb.
- Person is a K2, K3 or K4 ambulator based on Medicare Functional Classification Level (MFCL).
- Person is currently fitted with a prosthesis using a non-microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee for at least 6 months.
- Person was never fitted with microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee joint.
- Person is willing and able to independently provide informed consent.
- Person is willing to comply with study procedures.
- Person wears prosthesis daily and ≥ 8 hours/day.
- Person is walking on average 1km/day.
- Person is walking not slower than 3km/h (\~0.8m/s) (based on 10m walk test conducted during recruiting).
- Person is walking on level ground in a step over step manner.
You may not qualify if:
- Person is under 18 years of age.
- Person who weighs more than 136kg.
- Person who weighs less than 50kg.
- Person who is pregnant.
- Person has a history of chronic skin breakdown on the residual limb.
- Person has conditions that would prevent participation and pose increased risk (e.g. unstable cardiovascular conditions that preclude physical activity such as walking).
- Person falls ≥ once a week due to the reasons that could not be corrected by the new prosthesis (for ex. problems with vestibular system).
- Person is using under arm axillary crutches or walker.
- Person in an emergency, life threatening situation.
- Person is unwilling/unable to follow instructions.
- Person who is not available to follow the entire study protocol.
- Person who is participating in another study or intends to participate in another study during this study duration.
- Person who cannot personally provide their consent.
- Person who is not wearing prosthesis 8hours/day on average.
- Person who has a score on 10m walk test less than 3km/h (\~0.8m/s) (based on 10m walk test conducted during recruiting).
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center SKA Zicksee
Sankt Andrä am Zicksee, Burgenland, 7161, Austria
University Leuven
Pellenberg, 3212, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Limitations and Caveats
From 11 subjects that participated in the study, only 7 followed protocol. From post-hoc power analysis, 22 subjects would be required for 80% power to detect a difference of 35.9m (standard deviation = 30.3m) in the 6MWT. Patients were aware that a walking speed of greater than 0.8 m/s was a prerequisite for study participation, which could have lead to bias (elevated baseline measurement) and explain the small change in observed walking speed with C-Leg 3 and C-Leg 4 compared to baseline.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Research and Services Vienna
- Organization
- Otto Bock Healthcare GmbH
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephan Domayer, Prim.Dr.
Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2016
First Posted
May 6, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 30, 2018
Study Completion
May 30, 2018
Last Updated
October 14, 2021
Results First Posted
October 14, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Data for primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available within one year of study completion.