Comparative Effectiveness Between Microprocessor Knees and Non-Microprocessor Knees
MPK-AOPA
2 other identifiers
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will assess if the functional performance and musculoskeletal outcome of transfemoral amputees are improved after receiving a Microprocessor Knee (MPK) compared to a Non-Microprocessor Knees (NMPK).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 12, 2018
CompletedDecember 12, 2018
December 1, 2018
3 years
September 8, 2014
October 3, 2018
December 11, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Daily Activity Measured With Triaxial Accelerometers
Measurements will be obtained three times using activity monitors attached to waist, and bilaterally to the ankle and thigh for a period of 4 consecutive days, including 2 weekdays and 2 weekend days. Primary outcome will be the difference in activity level between the NMPK and MPK measurements.
Baseline (tested on subjects' current NMPK), 10 weeks (after 10 weeks acclimation time to the study MPK) , 4 weeks (subjects placed back on NMPK and tested after 4 weeks re-acclimation time)
Falls as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire Addendum (PEQ-A)
The Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) addendum (PEQ-A) is a self-administered questionnaire to quantify balance confidence, concentration, stumbles, and falls. The outcome will be difference in falls per month between the Non-Microprocessor Knee (NPMK) and MPK measurements. The number of falls was recorded as the sum of items #5 and #7 in the PEQ-A.
Baseline (tested on subjects' current NMPK), 10 weeks (after 10 weeks acclimation time to the study MPK) , 4 weeks (subjects placed back on NMPK and tested after 4 weeks re-acclimation time)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)
Baseline (tested on subjects' current NMPK), 10 weeks (after 10 weeks acclimation time to the study MPK) , 4 weeks (subjects placed back on NMPK and tested after 4 weeks re-acclimation time)
Study Arms (1)
Prosthetic knee joints
EXPERIMENTALEach subject will be tested using their current Non-Microprocessor Knee (NMPK) , fit and tested with a Microprocessor Knee (MPK), and then tested again with their NMPK, e.g. A-B-A design.
Interventions
MPKs are prosthetic knees that use a microprocessor to control the prosthetic knee mechanism and adjust knee stiffness.
A NMPK is a mechanical knee with either hydraulic or pneumatic controls.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral transfemoral amputee
- Medicare Functional Classification Level K2 or K3
- Currently using NMPK prosthesis
- No current residual limb problems, such as skin breakdown
- Able to ambulate without a gait aid
You may not qualify if:
- Previous stroke or other neuromuscular complications currently affecting gait
- Currently undergoing dialysis treatments
- Amputation of the contralateral limb
- Poor fit of current NMPK prosthesis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
- American Orthotic and Prosthetic Associationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kaufman KR, Bernhardt KA, Symms K. Functional assessment and satisfaction of transfemoral amputees with low mobility (FASTK2): A clinical trial of microprocessor-controlled vs. non-microprocessor-controlled knees. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 Oct;58:116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
PMID: 30077128RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Kenton Kaufman, Principal Investigator
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenton R Kaufman, PhD
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2014
First Posted
September 15, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 12, 2018
Results First Posted
December 12, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12