NCT02752802

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the amount of contrast media (CM) saved using the DyeVert system in diagnostic angiographic procedures compared to a control group.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 27, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2016

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 28, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

February 28, 2017

Status Verified

January 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

April 22, 2016

Results QC Date

November 4, 2016

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Contrast MediaAngiography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluate the Total Volume of CM Used Comparing the DyeVert Group to the Control Group.

    DyeVert is intended to reduce the total amount of contrast media (CM) administered during procedures requiring the injection of contrast media. Clinical evidence has demonstrated that CM can be toxic to the kidneys, leading to contrast induced nephropathy (CIN)

    All data will be collected on the day of the procedure, over an average of 12 hours.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Assessment of the Quality of Angiographic Images Between Groups

    AlAll data will be collected on the day of the procedure, over an average of 12 hours.

  • Assessment of Incidence of Serious Adverse Device Effect for Subjects Treated With the DyeVert System During the Procedure.

    All data will be collected on the day of the procedure, over an average of 12 hours.

Study Arms (2)

Treatment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The treatment group will include standard of care for diagnostic angiogram along with the utilizization of the DyeVert system.

Device: Diagnostic Coronary Angiogram

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The control group will include standard of care for diagnostic coronary angiograms.

Device: Diagnostic Coronary Angiogram

Interventions

Diagnostic angiographic procedure with the use of the DyeVert System.

ControlTreatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The subject is indicated for a diagnostic coronary angiogram procedure with a 5 French catheter only.
  • The subject is ≥ 18 years of age
  • The subject is willing and able to provide appropriate informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject is undergoing a STEMI procedure
  • Subject has previously been diagnosed with anomalous coronary anatomy
  • Subject has previously underwent coronary artery bypass grafting
  • Subject has severe peripheral artery disease at access site
  • Subject is having a staged PCI
  • The subject is female and currently pregnant
  • In the investigator's opinion, the subject is not considered to be a suitable candidate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein

Lübeck, 23538, Germany

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Brown JR, Solomon RJ, Sarnak MJ, McCullough PA, Splaine ME, Davies L, Ross CS, Dauerman HL, Stender JL, Conley SM, Robb JF, Chaisson K, Boss R, Lambert P, Goldberg DJ, Lucier D, Fedele FA, Kellett MA, Horton S, Phillips WJ, Downs C, Wiseman A, MacKenzie TA, Malenka DJ; Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Reducing contrast-induced acute kidney injury using a regional multicenter quality improvement intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Sep;7(5):693-700. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000903. Epub 2014 Jul 29.

    PMID: 25074372BACKGROUND
  • Gruberg L, Mintz GS, Mehran R, Gangas G, Lansky AJ, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Leon MB. The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Nov 1;36(5):1542-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00917-7.

    PMID: 11079656BACKGROUND
  • Klein LW, Sheldon MW, Brinker J, Mixon TA, Skelding K, Strunk AO, Tommaso CL, Weiner B, Bailey SR, Uretsky B, Kern M, Laskey W; Interventional Committee of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. The use of radiographic contrast media during PCI: a focused review: a position statement of the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov 1;74(5):728-46. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22113. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19830793BACKGROUND
  • Lameire N, Kellum JA; KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and renal support for acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 2). Crit Care. 2013 Feb 4;17(1):205. doi: 10.1186/cc11455.

    PMID: 23394215BACKGROUND
  • Levy EM, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RI. The effect of acute renal failure on mortality. A cohort analysis. JAMA. 1996 May 15;275(19):1489-94.

    PMID: 8622223BACKGROUND

Results Point of Contact

Title
Michele Shepard, Vice President of Clinical Affairs
Organization
Osprey Medical, Inc

Study Officials

  • Steffen Desch, MD

    University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lubeck

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2016

First Posted

April 27, 2016

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

May 1, 2016

Study Completion

May 1, 2016

Last Updated

February 28, 2017

Results First Posted

February 28, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations