DyeVert System RCT
Single Site Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the DyeVert System
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the amount of contrast media (CM) saved using the DyeVert system in diagnostic angiographic procedures compared to a control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 28, 2017
CompletedFebruary 28, 2017
January 1, 2017
1 month
April 22, 2016
November 4, 2016
January 9, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the Total Volume of CM Used Comparing the DyeVert Group to the Control Group.
DyeVert is intended to reduce the total amount of contrast media (CM) administered during procedures requiring the injection of contrast media. Clinical evidence has demonstrated that CM can be toxic to the kidneys, leading to contrast induced nephropathy (CIN)
All data will be collected on the day of the procedure, over an average of 12 hours.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Assessment of the Quality of Angiographic Images Between Groups
AlAll data will be collected on the day of the procedure, over an average of 12 hours.
Assessment of Incidence of Serious Adverse Device Effect for Subjects Treated With the DyeVert System During the Procedure.
All data will be collected on the day of the procedure, over an average of 12 hours.
Study Arms (2)
Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe treatment group will include standard of care for diagnostic angiogram along with the utilizization of the DyeVert system.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group will include standard of care for diagnostic coronary angiograms.
Interventions
Diagnostic angiographic procedure with the use of the DyeVert System.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject is indicated for a diagnostic coronary angiogram procedure with a 5 French catheter only.
- The subject is ≥ 18 years of age
- The subject is willing and able to provide appropriate informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is undergoing a STEMI procedure
- Subject has previously been diagnosed with anomalous coronary anatomy
- Subject has previously underwent coronary artery bypass grafting
- Subject has severe peripheral artery disease at access site
- Subject is having a staged PCI
- The subject is female and currently pregnant
- In the investigator's opinion, the subject is not considered to be a suitable candidate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein
Lübeck, 23538, Germany
Related Publications (5)
Brown JR, Solomon RJ, Sarnak MJ, McCullough PA, Splaine ME, Davies L, Ross CS, Dauerman HL, Stender JL, Conley SM, Robb JF, Chaisson K, Boss R, Lambert P, Goldberg DJ, Lucier D, Fedele FA, Kellett MA, Horton S, Phillips WJ, Downs C, Wiseman A, MacKenzie TA, Malenka DJ; Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Reducing contrast-induced acute kidney injury using a regional multicenter quality improvement intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Sep;7(5):693-700. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000903. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
PMID: 25074372BACKGROUNDGruberg L, Mintz GS, Mehran R, Gangas G, Lansky AJ, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Leon MB. The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Nov 1;36(5):1542-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00917-7.
PMID: 11079656BACKGROUNDKlein LW, Sheldon MW, Brinker J, Mixon TA, Skelding K, Strunk AO, Tommaso CL, Weiner B, Bailey SR, Uretsky B, Kern M, Laskey W; Interventional Committee of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. The use of radiographic contrast media during PCI: a focused review: a position statement of the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov 1;74(5):728-46. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22113. No abstract available.
PMID: 19830793BACKGROUNDLameire N, Kellum JA; KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and renal support for acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 2). Crit Care. 2013 Feb 4;17(1):205. doi: 10.1186/cc11455.
PMID: 23394215BACKGROUNDLevy EM, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RI. The effect of acute renal failure on mortality. A cohort analysis. JAMA. 1996 May 15;275(19):1489-94.
PMID: 8622223BACKGROUND
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michele Shepard, Vice President of Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- Osprey Medical, Inc
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steffen Desch, MD
University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lubeck
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2016
First Posted
April 27, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 28, 2017
Results First Posted
February 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share