Effect of Position on Back Pain and Comfort After Angiography
The Effect of the Posıtıon Gıven to Patıents After Coronary Angıography on Back Paın and Comfort
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
After coronary angiography, back pain and comfort levels were measured while the intervention group was positioned and the control group was not positioned
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 5, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2025
CompletedFebruary 25, 2025
November 1, 2024
2 months
November 14, 2024
February 19, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
control group
Patients were put to bed in the supine position at the exit of the CAG in accordance with the routine practice of the clinic and were allowed to stay in this position for 6 hours. When the patient was put to bed, VAS was applied for the patient introduction form, comfort and pain (0. hour). 2 From the withdrawal of mattresses. and 4. during the hours, VAS was applied. The patients' back pain and comfort were evaluated and the results were recorded in the relevant forms.
three months
intervention group
The patients were put to bed after KAG. The first measurement was taken when he was put to bed after KAG. The patient introduction form, VAS were applied for comfort and pain (0. At sa Tu). Following the withdrawal of the mattresses, the patient was given the semi-fawler position. 2 After being given the position. and 4. hours later, VAS was applied. The back pain and comfort of the patients were evaluated with the given position and the results were recorded on the relevant forms.
three months
Study Arms (2)
control group
NO INTERVENTIONAt the end of CAG, the patients were laid in the supine position in line with the routine practice of the clinic and were allowed to remain in this position for 6 hours. While lying in bed, the patient identification form and VAS for comfort and pain were applied (Hour 0). VAS was applied at the 2nd and 4th hours following the removal of the mattresses. The patients' back pain and comfort were evaluated and the results were recorded on the relevant forms.
intervention group
EXPERIMENTALAfter CAG, the patients were placed on the bed in the supine position. The first measurement was taken when he was put to bed after CAG, and the patient introduction form and VAS for comfort and pain were applied (0th hour). Following the removal of the mattresses, the patient was placed in the semi-fawler position. VAS was applied 2 and 4 hours after positioning. The patients' back pain and comfort were evaluated with the given position, and the results were recorded on the relevant forms.
Interventions
Following the removal of the mattresses, the patient was placed in the semi-fawler position.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Coronary angiography for the first time in the coronary intensive care unit and cardiology clinic
- Volunteer to participate in the study
- Femoral angiography procedure performed
- It created patients who had no obstacle to communication.
You may not qualify if:
- More than one coronary angiography procedure was performed
- Not volunteering to participate in the study
- Radial angiography procedure was performed
- Having a history of back surgery, existing hernia, or chronic waist or back pain
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sanko Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Eyüp
Gaziantep, şahinbey, 27000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eyüp FIRAT
SANKO Üniversitesi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Patients were assigned to the control and intervention groups by the minimization method. (Minimization was carried out according to parameters such as age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). A computer program that generates random numbers was used for the randomization process. In accordance with the randomization list, patients were randomly divided into intervention group and control group according to the order of admission to the hospital.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Nurse
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2024
First Posted
February 25, 2025
Study Start
November 5, 2023
Primary Completion
January 10, 2024
Study Completion
February 28, 2024
Last Updated
February 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share