Study Stopped
The reason was the fact that the study was not clinically feasible.
Esophageal Stent Migration With Endoscopic Suture Fixation Compared to Standard Deployment
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Esophageal stents are commonly used for benign esophageal pathology, especially strictures or esophageal mucosal defects such as leaks, fistulae, or perforations. The major limiting factor to stent placement is the high migration rate of the stent. Investigators are trying to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of endostitch in preventing stent migration in benign esophageal disease in comparison with standard, fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) placement without fixation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Mar 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2017
CompletedMay 15, 2017
May 1, 2017
11 months
April 18, 2016
May 11, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with Stent Migration as assessed by Symptoms suggestive of stent migration or objective evidence of migration on radiological imaging or endoscopy.
Subjects returning to the hospital following stent placement with symptoms suggestive of stent migration such as fever, abdominal or chest pain, nausea/vomiting, and dysphagia with objective evidence of stent migration either on radiological imaging or endoscopy.
Up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Clinical success of stent deployment as assessed by the relief of the pre-stent dysphagia
4 weeks, 6 months post-stent removal
Procedure time
During procedure
Stent insertion complication rate
3 days post-stent insertion, 4 weeks post-stent removal
Quality of life
prior to stent insertion and 6 months post-stent removal
Study Arms (2)
FCSEMS with Endostitching (ES)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGeneral anesthesia or conscious sedation will be started and an upper endoscope will be inserted into the participants mouth and advanced into the stomach. Endoscopic stenting with a fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) will then be performed. Once the stent is in place, the endoscope will be withdrawn from the participant to set-up the endostitch device unto the endoscope. Bites are taken separately with the first on the esophageal mucosa followed by a second on the stent itself and finishing with a last bite on esophageal mucosa. A cinch is then used to secure the deployed suture. An attempt at placing 2 sutures will be performed. Stent removal will then be performed at 8-weeks post-stent insertion.
FCSEMS with No Suturing (NS)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe procedure will be done in the same manner with same endoscopic technique, stent deployment, and timing of stent removal. The only difference would be the lack of suturing and naturally the need for suture cutting at stent removal.
Interventions
The fixation of FCSEMS using endostitch (ES) with the OverStitchTM system to prevent migration.
The insertion of FCSEMS with no suturing.
This is the stent that will be used to treat the esophageal pathology in both groups
This is the device used to apply the stitches to the stent in participants randomized to stent suturing.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients age 18 years and older
- Patients with esophageal refractory benign strictures (peptic, anastomotic, caustic, radiation, and idiopathic) where a 14 mm luminal diameter cannot be achieved over 2 dilation sessions at 1-3-week intervals.
- Patients with esophageal leak, perforation, or fistula referred for endoscopic stenting
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
You may not qualify if:
- Pediatric patients age under 18 years
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
- Patients with malignant esophageal lesions, primary or metastatic, requiring endoscopic stenting (all females of child bearing age will undergo urine pregnancy testing as per standard1 preprocedural testing)
- Benign strictures not having had two attempts at endoscopic dilation
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy defined by partial thromboplastin time (PTT) greater than 50 sec, or international normalized ratio (INR) greater than 1.5
- Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia with platelet count less than 50, 000
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mouen Khashab, M.D.
Johns Hopkins University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2016
First Posted
April 26, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05