Esophageal Perforation
7
2
2
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 7 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
25%
1 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (7)
Endoscopic Management of Esophageal Wall Defects
Esophageal Safety of High and Very High Power Short Duration Pulmonary Vein Isolation: a Randomized Comparison of the 50W and 90W Power Settings
Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Transmural Defects in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
Esophageal Injury of a Tip CF Sensing Ablation Catheter for HP-SD of Paroxysmal and Persistent AF (ESO-SAFE-HP-RF)
Removal of the Evolution® Esophageal Stent - Fully Covered
Esophageal Stent Migration With Endoscopic Suture Fixation Compared to Standard Deployment
A 75 Year Old With Dyspnea a Case Report.Observational Study