Fluids in Sepsis and Septic Shock
FISSH
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Despite evidence of the physiologic benefits and possible lower mortality associated with low chloride solutions, normal saline remains the most wildly used fluid in the world. Given uncertainty about the impact of lower chloride versus higher chloride solutions on mortality, it is unlikely that clinical practice will change without new and direct RCT evidence. Editorials published in leading critical care journals have called for RCT's to address this important clinical question. The proposed feasibility RCT will investigate the feasibility of a large-scale trial directly comparing low chloride versus normal chloride for resuscitation in septic shock on patient-important outcomes such as mortality and AKI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 sepsis
Started Aug 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 sepsis
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 18, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 19, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 19, 2017
CompletedAugust 29, 2018
August 1, 2018
1 year
April 8, 2016
August 27, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Consent Rate
Consent rate will be considered adequate if greater than 70% of substitute decision makers (SDMs) or patients when approached for consent choose to participate.
12 months
Patient Recruitment
Successful recruitment will be defined as achieving enrolment of 50 patients over the 12-month study period. This works out to approximately 1 patient/center/month. Once the pilot trial begins, the screening logs will be reviewed at all three study centers by the study steering committee on a monthly basis. We will record exclusions and reasons for physician refusals.
12 months
Protocol Adherence
Successful adherence will be defined as patients receiving at least 75% study fluid of all intravenous fluid that is administered in the ICU excluding blood products and medication infusions.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Hospital length of stay
Duration of index hospital stay censored at 90 days.
Hospital mortality
hospital stay or up to 90 days
Renal replacement therapy use
RRT use during index hospital stay censored at 90 days.
ICU length of stay
Duration of index ICU stay censored at 90 days.
Hyperkalemia
Incidence during index ICU stay or up to 30 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
higher chloride solutions
ACTIVE COMPARATORhigher chloride crystalloid (Normal saline) higher chloride albumin (5% Octalbin)
lower chloride solutions
ACTIVE COMPARATORlower chloride crystalloid (Ringer's lactate) lower chloride albumin (5% Plasbumin)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient must be at least 16 years of age
- Within 6 hours from presentation to hospital or activation of MET/RACE team to ward
- Requires fluid resuscitation for refractory hypotension OR organ hypoperfusion
- refractory hypotension definition - sBP \<90 OR MAP \<65 after 1L bolus given over 1 hour or less
- organ hypoperfusion - lactate \>4
- Suspected source of infection as etiology for hypotension
- Treating physician anticipates patient will require admission to ICU
You may not qualify if:
- Intracranial bleed or intracranial hypertension during this hospital admission
- Acute burn injury (\>10% body surface area)
- Bleeding/hemorrhage as likely cause of hypotension
- Plan in place to change goals of care to palliation
- Previously enrolled in FISSH
- Previously enrolled in confounding trial
- Transfer from another hospital or facility
- Admission directly from the operating room or PACU
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- McMaster Universitylead
- Hamilton Health Sciences Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Juravinski Hospital-Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 1C1, Canada
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 3H5, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Rochwerg B, Millen T, Austin P, Zeller M, D'Aragon F, Jaeschke R, Masse MH, Mehta S, Lamontagne F, Meade M, Guyatt G, Cook DJ; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Fluids in Sepsis and Septic Shock (FISSH): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 20;7(7):e017602. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017602.
PMID: 28729329DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2016
First Posted
April 22, 2016
Study Start
August 18, 2016
Primary Completion
August 19, 2017
Study Completion
August 19, 2017
Last Updated
August 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share