NCT02745626

Brief Summary

Orthodontic treatment has been traditionally carried out with fixed appliances involving the use of stainless steel brackets and archwires. The challenge has been to move teeth and their roots effectively while minimizing iatrogenic damage such as root resorption and gingival inflammation. In recent years, with the development of new appliances and brackets such as self-ligating brackets and clear aligners there have been reports of improved periodontal status, less iatrogenic root damage and improved hygiene during treatment. Although these treatment modalities have been rapidly accepted in clinical practice, both clinical and basic science research data regarding their overall biological compatibility to support higher levels of evidence based dentistry (e.g, randomized clinical trials) is lacking. In other words, their advantages and disadvantages in this regard have not yet been scientifically evaluated. Such quantification will provide invaluable information for improvements in these treatment modalities. A randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria to test the following hypothesis (H) up to 18 months into treatment: H-1: There is no difference in the amount of root resorption caused by the three different appliances. H-2: Gingival health is not affected by the 'type of appliance' being used to correct the malocclusion. H-3: There is no difference in the amount of bacterial count and the type of appliance being used for orthodontic treatment. The hypothesis will be tested with the following specific aims (SA): SA-1: To investigate the amount of orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption generated by treatment. SA-2: To evaluate the periodontal health of the patients with the different appliance systems. SA-3: To determine the changes in Streptococcus mutans and total bacterial counts contained in the plaque of orthodontic patients. SA-4: To ascertain whether there is an association between the microbial count and the type of appliance being used for orthodontic treatment

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
68

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2011

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2011

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2015

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 13, 2016

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 10, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

March 10, 2017

Status Verified

January 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

April 13, 2016

Results QC Date

September 21, 2016

Last Update Submit

January 20, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Plaque Index

    A measure of the plaque levels on the desired tooth surface. The following scores were used: 0 no plaque/debris on inspection and probing 1. thin film of plaque only visible after probing 2. ribbon-like layer of plaque covering the sulcus \& gingival crown areas but not filling interdental space 3. thick layer of plaque already visible at inspection and filling interdental space

    T0: Before treatment; T1: 9 months of treatment; T2: 18 months of treatment

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Gingival Index

    T0: Before treatment; T1: 9 months of treatment; T2: 18 months of treatment

  • Bleeding Index

    T0: Before treatment; T1: 9 months of treatment; T2: 18 months of treatment

  • Total Bacterial Count

    T0: Before treatment; T1: 9 months of treatment; T2: 18 months of treatment

  • S.Mutans Count

    T0: Before treatment; T1: 9 months of treatment; T2: 18 months of treatment

  • Amount of Root Resorption Observed for Maxillary Lateral Incisor = Length of Root at T0-Length of Root at T2 (in mm)

    T0-T2: 18 months of treatment

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Clear Aligner Appliance

EXPERIMENTAL

Clear Aligners, Align Technology Inc., Santa Clara, California

Device: Appliance

Self-ligating Appliance

EXPERIMENTAL

Carriere Self-Ligating Bracket, Carlsbad, CA

Device: Appliance

Conventional bracket appliance

EXPERIMENTAL

Preadjusted edge wise brackets using elastomeric ties.

Device: Appliance

Interventions

ApplianceDEVICE

Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.

Clear Aligner ApplianceConventional bracket applianceSelf-ligating Appliance

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • physically healthy with no relevant allergies or medical problems;
  • above 12 years of age at commencement of treatment;
  • in permanent dentition;
  • less than 5 mm of anterior crowding or spacing with adequate overjet and overbite;
  • ability to maintain adequate oral hygiene
  • in optimum dental health without immediate need for any allied dental procedure.

You may not qualify if:

  • skeletal anterior-posterior discrepancies between the maxilla and mandible (ANB ≥ 5°);
  • centric relation - centric occlusion discrepancies of greater than 3 mm;
  • presence of active periodontal disease.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Orthodontic Center at University of Connecticut Health Center

Farmington, Connecticut, 06032, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Chhibber A, Agarwal S, Yadav S, Kuo CL, Upadhyay M. Which orthodontic appliance is best for oral hygiene? A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Feb;153(2):175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.10.009.

Limitations and Caveats

There was no protocol in place to monitor the compliance of the patient with clear aligners.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Madhur Upadhyay, Director Orthodontic Clinic, Assistant Professor
Organization
University of Connecticut Health

Study Officials

  • Madhur Upadhyay, BDS,MDS,MDSc

    UConn Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director (Orthodontic Clinic & Fellowship Program), Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2016

First Posted

April 20, 2016

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion

May 1, 2015

Study Completion

November 1, 2015

Last Updated

March 10, 2017

Results First Posted

March 10, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations