Extensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage After Curative Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (SEIPLUS)
SEIPLUS
A Prospective, Multicentral, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Investigation the Value of Extensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage After Curative Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
508
1 country
13
Brief Summary
The investigators study aims to explore the potential function of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage in improving the overall survival and progression-free survival for locally advanced gastric cancer after curative resection. Hypothesis: Overall survival and progression-free survival of locally advanced gastric cancer are improved by extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable gastric-cancer
Started Mar 2016
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 21, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.7 years
March 28, 2016
February 20, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall survival
The survival rate between the surgery to the 3rd year due to all-cause death or last follow-up.
3-year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Disease-free survival
3-year
Peritoneal recurrence
3-year
Postoperative complications
an average of 10 days
Post-operative quality of life
an average of 10 days
Study Arms (2)
Extensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage
EXPERIMENTALGastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is performed. The peritoneal cavity of subject will be washed with 10 liters of warmed normal saline (1 liter per cycle for 10 cycles), followed by complete aspiration of the fluid . The abdomen will be closed as per standard.
Standard Treatment
NO INTERVENTIONGastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is performed. The peritoneal lavage will be done \< 3 cycles with 3 liters or less of warmed normal saline. The abdomen will be closed as per standard.
Interventions
Extensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Lower age limit of research subjects 18 years old and upper age limit of 80 years old.
- ECOG score standard (ECOG)performance status of 0 or 1 and expected to survive more than 6 months.
- Without any other malignancies.
- Written informed consent from the patient.
- Histologically proven primary gastric adenocarcinoma.
- Patients planned for open gastrectomy.
- Patients who have T3 (subserosal) or T4 (serosal) disease based on Ultrasound gastroscopy and intra-operative inspection with any N staging and M0 gastric cancer.
- No preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
- Length of esophageal invasion≤3cm and no need of thoracotomy for resection.
- Clinically T3, T4a or T4b.
- Clinically H0 and M0. No peritoneal dissemination or Distant metastases.
- Possible for R0 surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Female in pregnancy or lactation.
- Supraclavicular lymph nodes metastases,pelvis or ovarian implantation,peritoneal dissemination,liver,lung and bone metastases.
- Massive ascites or cachexia.
- Patients participating in any other clinical trails currently,or participated in other trails within 1 months.
- Without a history of stomach or esophageal cancers, including stromal tumor,sarcoma,lymphoma and carcinoid.
- Suffering from other serious diseases, including cardiovascular, respiratory, kidney, or liver disease, complicated by poorly controlled hypertension, diabetes, mental disorders or diseases.
- Patients with poor compliance or considered to be poor compliance.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sun Yat-sen Universitylead
- Anhui Provincial Hospitalcollaborator
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical Universitycollaborator
- Anqing Municipal Hospitalcollaborator
- Yuebei People's Hospitalcollaborator
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical Universitycollaborator
- Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicinecollaborator
- Jiangsu Cancer Institute & Hospitalcollaborator
- Jiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospitalcollaborator
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospitalcollaborator
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical Collegecollaborator
- Lishui hospital of Zhejiang Universitycollaborator
- Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (13)
Anqing Municipal Hospital
Anqing, Anhui, China
Anhui Provincial Hospital
Hefei, Anhui, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Hefei, Anhui, China
First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College
Wuhu, Anhui, China
Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Yuebei People's Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Jiangsu Cancer Institute & Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Jiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Lishui Hospital of Zhejiang University
Lishui, Zhejiang, China
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
Tianjin, China
Related Publications (11)
Mezhir JJ, Posner MC, Roggin KK. Prospective clinical trial of diagnostic peritoneal lavage to detect positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;107(8):794-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.23328. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
PMID: 23532564BACKGROUNDTang B, Peng ZH, Yu PW, Yu G, Qian F, Zeng DZ, Zhao YL, Shi Y, Hao YX, Luo HX. Aberrant expression of Cx43 is associated with the peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer and Cx43-mediated gap junction enhances gastric cancer cell diapedesis from peritoneal mesothelium. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 11;8(9):e74527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074527. eCollection 2013.
PMID: 24040271BACKGROUNDHamazoe R, Maeta M, Kaibara N. Intraperitoneal thermochemotherapy for prevention of peritoneal recurrence of gastric cancer. Final results of a randomized controlled study. Cancer. 1994 Apr 15;73(8):2048-52. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940415)73:83.0.co;2-q.
PMID: 8156509BACKGROUNDXu DZ, Zhan YQ, Sun XW, Cao SM, Geng QR. Meta-analysis of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep 15;10(18):2727-30. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i18.2727.
PMID: 15309728BACKGROUNDSautner T, Hofbauer F, Depisch D, Schiessel R, Jakesz R. Adjuvant intraperitoneal cisplatin chemotherapy does not improve long-term survival after surgery for advanced gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1994 May;12(5):970-4. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.5.970.
PMID: 8164049BACKGROUNDRosen HR, Jatzko G, Repse S, Potrc S, Neudorfer H, Sandbichler P, Zacherl J, Rabl H, Holzberger P, Lisborg P, Czeijka M. Adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy with carbon-adsorbed mitomycin in patients with gastric cancer: results of a randomized multicenter trial of the Austrian Working Group for Surgical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Aug;16(8):2733-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2733.
PMID: 9704725BACKGROUNDCoccolini F, Cotte E, Glehen O, Lotti M, Poiasina E, Catena F, Yonemura Y, Ansaloni L. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;40(1):12-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.10.019. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
PMID: 24290371BACKGROUNDKuramoto M, Shimada S, Ikeshima S, Matsuo A, Yagi Y, Matsuda M, Yonemura Y, Baba H. Extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage as a standard prophylactic strategy for peritoneal recurrence in patients with gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):242-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c80e.
PMID: 19638909BACKGROUNDMisawa K, Mochizuki Y, Ohashi N, Matsui T, Nakayama H, Tsuboi K, Sakai M, Ito S, Morita S, Kodera Y. A randomized phase III trial exploring the prognostic value of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage in addition to standard treatment for resectable advanced gastric cancer: CCOG 1102 study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan;44(1):101-3. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyt157. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
PMID: 24287077BACKGROUNDGuo J, Xu A, Sun X, Zhao X, Xia Y, Rao H, Zhang Y, Zhang R, Chen L, Zhang T, Li G, Xu H, Xu D. Three-year outcomes of the randomized phase III SEIPLUS trial of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage for locally advanced gastric cancer. Nat Commun. 2021 Nov 15;12(1):6598. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26778-8.
PMID: 34782599DERIVEDGuo J, Xu A, Sun X, Zhao X, Xia Y, Rao H, Zhang Y, Zhang R, Chen L, Zhang T, Li G, Xu H, Xu D. Combined Surgery and Extensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage vs Surgery Alone for Treatment of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The SEIPLUS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):610-616. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0153.
PMID: 30916742DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Study Chair
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2016
First Posted
April 20, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 21, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02