Perinatal Stroke: Understanding Brain Reorganization
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The incidence of perinatal stroke is relatively common, as high as 1 in 2,300 births, but little is known about the resulting changes in the brain that eventually manifest as cerebral palsy (CP). Motor signs that indicate the infant is beginning to develop CP often do not become evident for several months after the diagnosis of perinatal stroke which delays therapy. The main purpose of this study is to examine early brain reorganization in infants 3-12 months of age corrected for prematurity with perinatal stroke using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). In addition, the association between the brain reorganization and motor outcomes of these infant participants will be identified. In this study, the MRI scans will include diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) - an established method used to investigate the integrity of pathways in the brain that control limb movement. Infants will be scanned during nature sleeping after feeding. The real scanning time will be less than 38 minutes. TMS is a painless, non-surgical brain stimulation device which uses principles of electromagnetic induction to excite cortical tissue from outside the skull. Using TMS as a device to modulate and examine cortical excitability in children with hemiparetic CP and in adults has been conducted previously. In this infant study, we will assess cortical excitability from the motor cortex of both the ipsilesional and contralesional hemispheres under the guidance of a frameless stereotactic neuronavigation system. Additionally, the investigators will assess infants' movement quality using an age-appropriate standardized movement assessment. This will allow the investigators to examine the relationship between measures of motor pathway integrity and early signs of potential motor impairment. We will longitudinally follow enrolled infants, and complete repeat assessments at 12- and 24-months corrected age to assess how infants develop over time after perinatal stroke. The remote follow-up will occur at 5 years or less.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 19, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2022
CompletedSeptember 19, 2022
September 1, 2022
5.3 years
February 19, 2016
January 20, 2022
September 5, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Cortical Excitability MEP Amplitude (µV)
Cortical excitability of ipsilesional and contralesional hemispheres assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in infants with perinatal stroke. TMS will be used to assess cortical excitability through electromagnetic depolarization of targeted cortical neurons through painless pulses delivered over the scalp. The estimated time of TMS assessment is around 2 hours during Visit 2. Outcome is reported as MEP amplitude in units of microvolts (µV).
2 hours
Cortical Excitability Percentage of Maximum
Cortical excitability of ipsilesional and contralesional hemispheres assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in infants with perinatal stroke. TMS will be used to assess cortical excitability through electromagnetic depolarization of targeted cortical neurons through painless pulses delivered over the scalp. The estimated time of TMS assessment is around 2 hours during Visit 2. The outcome of motor threshold will be reported as the percentage of maximum stimulator output.
2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
General Movement Assessment
15 minutes
Adverse Events
2 days
Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT)
15 minutes
Study Arms (1)
All Infants
Each infant will receive an Magnetic Resonance Imaging, then Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Cortical Excitability testing, and General Movement Assessment. These 3 different components of the one arm in which all infants are involved will be collectively assessed.
Interventions
Spontaneous movement assessment of infant while lying in unperturbed state.
Eligibility Criteria
The pilot study portion will recruit infants with unilateral perinatal stroke between 3 to 5 months of corrected age to understand their brain reorganization after stroke. The follow-up study portion will recruit children aged 5 years or younger who have been diagnosed with perinatal stroke and who participated in the pilot study.
You may qualify if:
- Birth diagnosis of unilateral perinatal stroke by cranial ultrasound, computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Corrected gestational age between 3 and 24 months of age for both infants with stroke and typically developing infants
You may not qualify if:
- Metabolic Disorders
- Neoplasm
- Disorders of Cellular Migration and Proliferation
- Acquired Traumatic Brain Injury
- Received surgeries that may constraint current spontaneous movements
- Indwelling metal or incompatible medical devices
- Received surgeries that may constraint current spontaneous movements
- Other neurologic disorders unrelated to stroke
- Small for gestational age (SGA): Infants are smaller in size than normal for the gestational age
- Apneic episodes and syncope (known heart defects) for the safety of participants in the stud.
- Genetic disorders
- Uncontrolled seizures
- \- Previous participation in pilot study
- \- Lack of wireless internet access or computer to participate in virtual Zoom call
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Related Publications (13)
Lehman LL, Rivkin MJ. Perinatal arterial ischemic stroke: presentation, risk factors, evaluation, and outcome. Pediatr Neurol. 2014 Dec;51(6):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.07.031. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
PMID: 25444092BACKGROUNDEyre JA, Taylor JP, Villagra F, Smith M, Miller S. Evidence of activity-dependent withdrawal of corticospinal projections during human development. Neurology. 2001 Nov 13;57(9):1543-54. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.9.1543.
PMID: 11706088BACKGROUNDChen CY, Tafone S, Lo W, Heathcock JC. Perinatal stroke causes abnormal trajectory and laterality in reaching during early infancy. Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Mar;38:301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.11.014. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
PMID: 25577180BACKGROUNDThelen E, Corbetta D, Spencer JP. Development of reaching during the first year: role of movement speed. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Oct;22(5):1059-76. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.5.1059.
PMID: 8865616BACKGROUNDEinspieler C, Prechtl HF. Prechtl's assessment of general movements: a diagnostic tool for the functional assessment of the young nervous system. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11(1):61-7. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.20051.
PMID: 15856440BACKGROUNDEyre JA, Miller S, Clowry GJ, Conway EA, Watts C. Functional corticospinal projections are established prenatally in the human foetus permitting involvement in the development of spinal motor centres. Brain. 2000 Jan;123 ( Pt 1):51-64. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.1.51.
PMID: 10611120BACKGROUNDEyre JA, Smith M, Dabydeen L, Clowry GJ, Petacchi E, Battini R, Guzzetta A, Cioni G. Is hemiplegic cerebral palsy equivalent to amblyopia of the corticospinal system? Ann Neurol. 2007 Nov;62(5):493-503. doi: 10.1002/ana.21108.
PMID: 17444535BACKGROUNDGillick BT, Krach LE, Feyma T, Rich TL, Moberg K, Menk J, Cassidy J, Kimberley T, Carey JR. Safety of primed repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and modified constraint-induced movement therapy in a randomized controlled trial in pediatric hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4 Suppl):S104-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
PMID: 25283350BACKGROUNDGillick BT, Krach LE, Feyma T, Rich TL, Moberg K, Thomas W, Cassidy JM, Menk J, Carey JR. Primed low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and constraint-induced movement therapy in pediatric hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Jan;56(1):44-52. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12243. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
PMID: 23962321BACKGROUNDKirton A, Chen R, Friefeld S, Gunraj C, Pontigon AM, Deveber G. Contralesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic hemiparesis in subcortical paediatric stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Jun;7(6):507-13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70096-6. Epub 2008 May 1.
PMID: 18455961BACKGROUNDNarayana S, Rezaie R, McAfee SS, Choudhri AF, Babajani-Feremi A, Fulton S, Boop FA, Wheless JW, Papanicolaou AC. Assessing motor function in young children with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Pediatr Neurol. 2015 Jan;52(1):94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.08.031. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
PMID: 25439485BACKGROUNDvan de Ruit M, Perenboom MJ, Grey MJ. TMS brain mapping in less than two minutes. Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
PMID: 25556004BACKGROUNDKowalski JL, Hickey M, Rao R, Georgieff MK, Chen M, Gillick BT. Safety of single-pulse TMS in two infants with implanted patent ductus arteriosus closure devices. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):861-862. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 14. No abstract available.
PMID: 32289718DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Bernadette Gillick
- Organization
- University of Minnesota
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bernadette T Gillick, PhD, MSPT, PT
University of Minnesota
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2016
First Posted
April 19, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 31, 2021
Study Completion
July 31, 2022
Last Updated
September 19, 2022
Results First Posted
April 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09