Conventional Double-lumen Tube vs VivaSight DL
Ability of Anesthesiologist to Placid a Double-lumen Tube. A Randomized Crossover Cadaver Study Comparing VivaSight DL and Conventional Double-lumen Tube
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators sought to compare the time to intubation and success rate of the endotracheal intubation using standard double-lumen tube and video tube ETView DL in an adult cadaver model in normal and difficult airway conditions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2016
CompletedApril 18, 2016
April 1, 2016
4 months
April 13, 2016
April 15, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time required for endotracheal intubation
time from pick up the tube to first ventilation
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time required for visual confirmation of double lumen tube position position
1 day
success rate of intubation attempt
1 day
Ease of intubation
1 day
Study Arms (2)
Normal airway
EXPERIMENTALintubation with normal airway Cormack-Lehane classivication I
difficult airway
EXPERIMENTALintubation with difficult airway Cormack-Lehane classivication III
Interventions
intubation using conventional double-lumen tube
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- fresh adult cadavers
You may not qualify if:
- cadavers with face injures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Warsaw, Department of Emergency Medicine
Warsaw, Masovia, 02-005, Poland
Related Publications (2)
Kurowski A, Szarpak L, Truszewski Z, Czyzewski L. Can the ETView VivaSight SL Rival Conventional Intubation Using the Macintosh Laryngoscope During Adult Resuscitation by Novice Physicians?: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(21):e850. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000850.
PMID: 26020389BACKGROUNDSzarpak L, Kurowski A, Zasko P, Karczewska K, Czyzewski L, Bogdanski L, Adamczyk P, Truszewski Z. Double-lumen tube tracheal intubation in a manikin model using the VivaSight Double Lumen: a randomized controlled comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;34(1):103-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Oct 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 26527175BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2016
First Posted
April 18, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 18, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04