NCT01279564

Brief Summary

Airway management is one of the most important tasks facing the physician, especially the anesthesiologist. Fast and correct performance of endotracheal intubations done as normal routine in the operating room, but can save life everywhere. To make intubation easier, several newly designed tubes and laryngoscopes are developed and tested every year. Their performance is evaluated subjectively by the acting anesthesiologist, and by using objective parameters such as speed of intubation, the force applied during laryngoscopy , or catecholamines secretion during intubation as a stress parameter . The studies set for testing these parameters lead to establish accepted indications for the treatment of the airway in cases of anticipated and unanticipated difficult airway. In the present study we will compare the performance parameters of intubation using Etview Tracheoscopic Ventilation Tube - TVT to the standard tube, of which most of daily intubations are carried with. The Etview TVT is similar to the standard endotracheal tube; its outer dimensions and material is exactly as the standard tube, the difference is only the inner fiber of the camera.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
72

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2011

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2011

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 19, 2011

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2011

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2011

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 11, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

July 27, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

January 17, 2011

Results QC Date

November 4, 2014

Last Update Submit

June 27, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Endotracheal intubation and its outcomes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • In the Present Study we Will Compare the Performance Parameters of Intubation Using Etview Tracheoscopic Ventilation Tube - TVT to the Standard Tube

    1 year

  • Duration of Endotracheal Intubation

    Time between introducing the laryngoscope and inflation of tube's cuff

    The induction of general anesthesia, on the operating day (first day)

Study Arms (2)

ETview

EXPERIMENTAL

ETview TVT endotracheal tube

Device: ETview TVT endotracheal tube

Control

SHAM COMPARATOR

Endotracheal tube

Device: Endotracheal tube

Interventions

intubation

ETview

Intubation

Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation

You may not qualify if:

  • Age under 18 years
  • ASA greater than 3
  • Lip, oral or airway infection
  • Coagulopathy
  • Indication to perform Sellick's maneuver for increased risk of aspiration

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Rambam Health Care Campus

Haifa, Israel

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Michal Barak
Organization
Rambam Health Care Campus

Study Officials

  • Michal Barak, MD

    Rambam Health Care Campus

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2011

First Posted

January 19, 2011

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2011

Study Completion

December 1, 2011

Last Updated

July 27, 2016

Results First Posted

November 11, 2014

Record last verified: 2016-06

Locations