Efficacy of a Whitening Dentifrice on Tooth Discoloration
Safety, Acceptability and Efficacy of a Silica Dentifrice Containing Blue Pigment on Tooth Whitening: a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
75
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the whitening effect of a toothpaste containing blue pigment with a conventional toothpaste and with at-home tooth bleaching; evaluate the subject's perception about tooth color improvement and; and evaluate the safety and acceptability of these products.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Sep 2012
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 11, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2016
CompletedApril 18, 2016
April 1, 2016
1.8 years
April 11, 2016
April 13, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Tooth shade changes from baseline until 4 weeks of the beginning of intervention
The tooth shade evaluation was performed at each time frame using the digital spectrophotometer that provided tooth shade via two different methods: using the 16 shade tabs in the Vita shade guide (B1-C4); and the CIEL\*a\*b\* color system. The difference between the color coordinates was calculated as: ∆E\*= \[(∆L\*)2 + (∆a\*)2 + (∆b\*)2\]1/2, where ΔL\*, Δa\*, and Δb\* are the mathematical differences among CIE L\*, a\*, and b\* at the different time frames and baseline measurements.
Baseline, Immediately after first product application, 2 weeks and 4 weeks of the beginning of interventions
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Subjects' perception about improvement on tooth color
2 weeks of the beginning of interventions
Tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation evaluation
Daily during three weeks
Acceptability of interventions
2 weeks of the beginning of interventions
Study Arms (3)
G1 (group 1) - Conventional toothpaste
PLACEBO COMPARATORG1 used a conventional toothpaste in daily oral regimen
G2 (group 2) - Whitening toothpaste
EXPERIMENTALG2 used a whitening toothpaste containing blue pigment in daily oral regimen
G3 (group 3) - 10 % Carbamide peroxide
ACTIVE COMPARATORG3 made an at-home tooth bleaching with 10 % Carbamide peroxide
Interventions
The participants should brush their teeth with conventional toothpaste for 90 seconds, twice per day, during two weeks.They should place a pea-size amount of toothpaste on their toothbrushes, use dental floss, but not mouth rinse.
The subjects should brush teeth with whitening toothpaste containing blue pigment for 90 seconds, twice per day, during two weeks.They should place a pea-size amount of toothpaste on toothbrushes, use dental floss, but not mouth rinse.
The subjects should dispense the bleaching gel at night into the trays (maxillary and mandibular) and to insert them to cover at least the anterior teeth for a period of 4 h per day, over a 2-week period. Both arches should be bleached at the same time. During the period of bleaching, volunteers should receive the same toothpaste used by G1, in other words, without "whitening agents", to standardize their oral hygiene regimen
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To have six maxillary anterior teeth with a mean shade of C1 or darker (Vitapan Classical, Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, Germany),
You may not qualify if:
- With active caries or periodontal disease,
- Presenting non-vital anterior teeth,
- Previous hypersensitivity,
- Under orthodontic treatment,
- With structural defect in the enamel,
- Who had used tooth whiteners within the previous 3 years,
- Smokers,
- Pregnant or lactating
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Federal University of Paraíbalead
- Unilever R&Dcollaborator
Related Publications (2)
Meireles SS, Santos IS, Bona AD, Demarco FF. A double-blind randomized clinical trial of two carbamide peroxide tooth bleaching agents: 2-year follow-up. J Dent. 2010 Dec;38(12):956-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
PMID: 20709137BACKGROUNDWalsh TF, Rawlinson A, Wildgoose D, Marlow I, Haywood J, Ward JM. Clinical evaluation of the stain removing ability of a whitening dentifrice and stain controlling system. J Dent. 2005 May;33(5):413-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.021. Epub 2004 Dec 20.
PMID: 15833397BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jossaria P Sousa, Master
Federal University of Paraiba
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Master degree in Dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2016
First Posted
April 18, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 18, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share