Clinical Effectiveness of In-office Bleaching Activated With a LED/Laser Device
Color Change and Sensitivity Level for In-office Bleaching With and Without a LED/Laser Device
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is a controversy in the dentistry literature about how the use of associated light to activate 35% hydrogen peroxide gel during in-office tooth bleaching may increase the bleaching effectiveness. The studies that demonstrated an increased level of bleaching using light activation employed lower hydrogen peroxide gels while the ones reporting no statistical difference employed higher hydrogen peroxide gels. The hypothesis of this study is that the effectiveness of light activation tooth bleaching in dependent on the hydrogen peroxide concentration employed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 28, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedDecember 6, 2011
December 1, 2011
8 months
October 28, 2010
December 5, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in color
The change in color will be measured using Vita Shade Classical scale at baseline and after the end of the bleaching protocol. A spectrophootometer Easy Shade will also be used and the coordinates of the CIELab system will be recorded.
at the 2-week recall
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Prevalence and intensity of tooth sensitivity
24-hours after the bleaching
Study Arms (4)
35% hydrogen peroxide control
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe tooth bleaching will be performed using a high hydrogen peroxide concentration (35%) without light-activation with LED/light device
20% hydrogen peroxide
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe tooth bleaching will be performed with a low hydrogen peroxide concentration (20%) without light activation with a LED/laser device
35% hydrogen peroxide + light
EXPERIMENTALThe tooth bleaching will be performed with a high hydrogen peroxide concentration (35%) associated with LED/laser light activation
20% hydrogen peroxide + light
EXPERIMENTALThe tooth bleaching will be performed with a low hydrogen peroxide concentration (20%) associated with LED/laser light activation
Interventions
Two clinical sessions of tooth bleaching will be performed in each patient with a 1-week interval between them. In each session, three 15-min applications of the gel will be done using one of the two concentrations under investigation. In half of the sample of each concentration, the gel will be activated with a LED/laser device for a total of 3 min, as specified by the DMC manufacturer.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants should be at least 18 years old;
- Participants should have good general and oral health
- Participants should have six caries-free maxillary anterior teeth without restorations on the labial surfaces
- Participants should be willing to sign a consent form
- Participants should have central incisors darker than shade C2.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants that had undergone tooth-whitening procedures
- Participants that had labial anterior restorations, were pregnant or lactating.
- Participants with severe internal tooth discoloration (such as tetracycline stains, fluorosis, pulpless teeth).
- Participants with bruxism habits or any gross pathology in the mouth
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Dentistry - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
Ponta Grossa, ParanĂ¡, 84030-900, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alessandra Reis, DDS, MS
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 28, 2010
First Posted
November 1, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 6, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-12