Loading search results
ESTEFOL
Analysis of Follicular Steroid Synthesis During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation With Recombinant FSH vs HMG in GnRH Antagonist Cycles
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
112
1 country
1
Study Start
October 18, 2016
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 15, 2018
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 15, 2018
Actual (reported)Serum concentrations of the different hormones involved in follicular steroid genesis during a cycle of controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH or HMG will be compared in this study. Serum Progesterone (P) levels at the end of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (i.e. the day of triggering) have been related to cycle outcome, in terms of ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates. Large cohort studies show that P levels above a certain threshold are associated with poorer cycle outcome. The mechanisms behind P elevation are not well understood yet. It has been shown that P levels are positively related to ovarian response and to the dose of FSH given during COS. Furthermore, it has been well documented that P levels at the end of stimulation are significantly higher when recombinant (r) FSH is used for COS when compared to HMG, either in a GnRH agonist long protocol or in a GnRH antagonist protocol. Some authors suggest that this finding is explained by the fact that COS with rFSH provides a higher oocyte yield than when hMG is given, so the higher P levels observed would be explained by the larger number of follicles developed when rFSH is used. On the other hand, other authors explain this event by a different follicular esteroidogenesis when HMG is used for COS compared to rFSH The hypotheisis behind this assumption is that rFSH enhances P synthesis from its precursor pregnenolone in the granulosa cells. This P is unable to be further metabolized into androgens because of the lack of 17-20 lyase in the human granulosa cells, and therefore is delivered into circulation. On the other hand, when HMG is given for COS, the ∆4 pathway is promoted, and pregnenolone will be catabolized in to Dehidroepiandrostenodione (DHEA), in the theca cells, and this one to Androstenodione, which will be finally aromatized in to estrogens. This mechanism will explain the lower P and higher E2 levels observed in HMG cycles in comparison to rFSH cycles.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 15, 2018
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
April 8, 2016
Actual (reported)April 14, 2016
Actual (reported)October 18, 2016
Actual (reported)June 15, 2018
Actual (reported)June 15, 2018
Actual (reported)March 3, 2020
Actual (reported)SERUM PROGSTERONE CONCENTRATION
Compare hormonal blood serum concentrations of progesterone during ovarian stimulation implied in follicular steroidogenesis during a cycle of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with either r-FSH or HP-HMG.
21 days
OVARIAN RESPONSE
NUMBER OF FOLICLES REACHED AND PUNCTURED AFTER CONTROLED OVARIAN STIMULATION
21 days
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and rFSH in women with normal ovarian function.
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG with normal ovarian function.
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and rFSH in women with normal ovarian function.
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG in women with normal ovarian function.
IVI Valencia
Valencia, 46015, Spain
Bosch E, Alama P, Romero JL, Mari M, Labarta E, Pellicer A. Serum progesterone is lower in ovarian stimulation with highly purified HMG compared to recombinant FSH owing to a different regulation of follicular steroidogenesis: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2024 Feb 1;39(2):393-402. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead251.
Ernesto Bosch, MDPhD
IVI VALENCIA
112 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
April 8, 2016
First Posted
April 14, 2016
Study Start
October 18, 2016
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
June 15, 2018
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 15, 2018
Actual (reported)Last Updated
March 3, 2020
Results First Posted
March 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: