Use of Antagonist Versus Agonist GnRH in Oocyte Recipient Endometrium Preparation
1 other identifier
interventional
570
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Oocyte donation is a well established procedure in assisted reproduction treatments (ART). It is demonstrated that the use of hormonal substitution therapy, for the synchronization of the cycles between the recipients and the donors, provides good results, similar to the ones obtained with the natural cycle. In the patients - recipients with preserved ovarian function, the recipient's natural cycle is annulled, thus preventing the spontaneous Luteinizing Hormone surge. Simultaneously and while waiting for the suitable donor, her endometrium is prepared. When the donation occurs and fertilization with the husband sperm takes place, her cycle is stimulated again in order to synchronize her window of implantation with the donor's ovulation. Two different medications are commonly used to inhibit spontaneous ovulation: either GnRHa agonist or GnRH antagonists. The present study consists of the comparison between the single dose GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl 3,75 IM) and the 7 day dosage of GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide 0,25 mg). The administration of GnRHa is used fundamentally as a long liberation formulation, administered in a single intramuscular injection (IM), which is more practical in terms of use. Nevertheless, the unnecessary persistence and the potentially unfavorable action of GnRHa during the luteal phase and early gestation have questioned its use. The recovery of the Hypophysarian function begins only 8 weeks after the single injection of long liberation of triptorelina 3.75 mg. The GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide 0,25 mg) makes the hypofisary inhibition shorter than with the analogues and can prepare similar endometrium characteristics as a natural cycle. The recipients will be assigned randomly to a group of treatment or another.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jan 2007
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2009
CompletedFebruary 15, 2013
February 1, 2013
2.8 years
February 21, 2008
February 14, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
clinical pregnancy rate
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
implantation rate
1 month
Study Arms (2)
A
ACTIVE COMPARATORA: Antagonist
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORAgonist GnRH
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- infertile females with preserved gonadal function
- ages 18 - 43 years old
You may not qualify if:
- BMI: \> 28
- recurrent miscarriages
- severe male factor
- important miomas
- \> 44 years old
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IVI Valencia
Valencia, 46015, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Gynaecologist IVI valencia; Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2008
First Posted
March 12, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
October 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 15, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-02