Comparing the ADR With Air Insufflation, Water Immersion and Water Exchange During Two-endoscopist Colonoscopy
A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Adenoma Detection Rate With Air Insufflation, Water Immersion and Water Exchange During Two-endoscopist Colonoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
371
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
Interval (missed) cancers and lower than expected mortality reduction of proximal colon cancers in the United States and elsewhere after screening colonoscopy drew attention to quality indicators. Missed adenomas which are more likely to be in the proximal colon may be contributing factors. An independent predictor of the risk of interval cancers is adenoma detection rate. In pilot observations, the investigators showed that water exchange enhanced adenoma detection in the right colon (cecum to hepatic flexure). This prospective, randomized controlled trial will compare water exchange with water immersion and traditional air insufflation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. The investigators test the hypothesis that compared with air insufflation and water immersion, water exchange produces a significantly higher adenoma detection rate in the right colon
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 25, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2020
CompletedMay 29, 2020
May 1, 2020
4.2 years
August 25, 2015
May 28, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
adenoma detection rate in the right colon
one week
Secondary Outcomes (3)
overall adenoma detection rate
one week
post-procedure discomfort
1 day after colonoscopy
30 days complication rate
30 days
Study Arms (3)
air insufflation
ACTIVE COMPARATORAir insufflation will be used throughout whole procedure of colonoscopy
water immersion
ACTIVE COMPARATORWater will be infused during the insertion phase and removed during withdrawal phase of colonoscopy
water exchange
ACTIVE COMPARATORWater will be infused and removed during insertion phase of colonoscopy
Interventions
Water will infused during insertion phase and removed during withdrawal phase of colonoscopy
Water will infused and removed during insertion phase of colonoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing colonoscopy performed by the participating endoscopists
You may not qualify if:
- obstructive lesions of the colon known before colonoscopy
- massive ascites
- past history of partial colectomy
- refusal to provide written informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, Veterans Affairs Greater
North Hills, California, United States
Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital
Chiayi City, Taiwan, 622, Taiwan
Related Publications (5)
Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, Li C, He J, Rabeneck L. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. 2004 Aug;127(2):452-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.032.
PMID: 15300577BACKGROUNDStock C, Pulte D, Haug U, Brenner H. Subsite-specific colorectal cancer risk in the colorectal endoscopy era. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):621-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.025.
PMID: 22341107BACKGROUNDLeung FW, Amato A, Ell C, Friedland S, Harker JO, Hsieh YH, Leung JW, Mann SK, Paggi S, Pohl J, Radaelli F, Ramirez FC, Siao-Salera R, Terruzzi V. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Sep;76(3):657-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.467.
PMID: 22898423BACKGROUNDRadaelli F, Paggi S, Amato A, Terruzzi V. Warm water infusion versus air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.025.
PMID: 20883846BACKGROUNDHsieh YH, Lin HJ, Tseng KC. Limited water infusion decreases pain during minimally sedated colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 May 7;17(17):2236-40. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i17.2236.
PMID: 21633535BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yu-Hsi Hsieh, MD
Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2015
First Posted
April 14, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 1, 2020
Study Completion
February 1, 2020
Last Updated
May 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05