Boosting Emotions & Happiness in Outpatients Living With Diabetes
BEHOLD
A Positive Psychology Program for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators developed a novel, telephone-based, 12-week positive psychology intervention and will assess its feasibility and short-term impact in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and suboptimal health behavior adherence. Participants will receive a positive psychology (PP) manual, complete exercises (e.g., writing a gratitude letter, performing acts of kindness), and review these activities by phone with a study trainer over the 12-week study period. Specific Aim #1 (Feasibility and acceptability (immediate impact); primary aim): To assess whether PP exercises administered over the phone are feasible and linked with immediate benefit in patients with T2D, as measured by ratings provided pre- and post- each exercise. Hypothesis: The PP exercises will be feasible (i.e., 4 of the 7 PP exercises will be completed by a majority of participants, and participants will have a mean score of at least 7 out of 10 on ratings of ease of completion for the exercises. The PP exercises will also have adequate immediate impact (i.e., mean ratings of 7/10 of exercise utility post-exercise and ratings of optimism post-exercise that are significantly higher than pre-exercise). Specific Aim #2 (Changes in clinical outcome measures): To determine whether the PP intervention is linked to improvements in psychological well-being, during and after the intervention period (6 \& 12 weeks), via measures of optimism, gratitude, depression, and anxiety. To examine whether the brief PP intervention is associated with improvements in self-reported outcomes related to health (diabetes self-care, diabetes distress, health related quality of life), during and after the intervention. Hypothesis: Participants will have higher mean scores on all psychological outcome measures at 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline. Participants will also have higher mean scores on all health-related outcome measures at 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable type-2-diabetes
Started Aug 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable type-2-diabetes
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2016
CompletedApril 13, 2016
April 1, 2016
11 months
March 30, 2016
April 7, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Intervention Feasibility
Rate of intervention feasibility will be measured by the number of exercises completed by each participant. After the exercise, participants will rate the ease of the exercise on a 0-10 Likert scale. Feasibility will be defined as: 4 of the 7 PP exercises will be completed by a majority of patients and subjects will have a mean score of at least 3.5 out of 5 on ratings of ease of completion for the exercises.
10 Weeks
Intervention Acceptability
To assess acceptability (and immediate impact), participants will rate their optimism and positive affect on a 0-10 Likert scale prior to completing the exercise and then immediately following the exercise. Adequate immediate impact will be defined as: mean ratings of 3.5/5 of exercise utility post-exercise and ratings of optimism post-exercise that are significantly higher than pre-exercise.
10 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in LOT-R Scores
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Change in GQ-6 Scores
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Change in HADS Scores
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Change in DDS Scores
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Changes in PROMIS-PF-10 Scores
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Positive Psychology
EXPERIMENTALThe Positive Psychology intervention consists of 7 exercises that will be completed by the participant with the guidance of a trainer. Exercises: Gratitude for positive events Using personal strengths Gratitude letter Enjoyable and meaningful activities Recalling past success Performing acts of kindness Repeating one of the previous exercises.
Interventions
The Positive Psychology intervention consists of 7 exercises that will be completed by the participant with the guidance of a trainer.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Current patient of the MGH Diabetes Center or inpatient on Ellison 9-11, White 8-11, Ellison 16, or Bigelow 11
- Diagnosis of type 2 Diabetes (confirmed via medical record and patient's treatment provider)
- Age 18 and older
- Able to read/write in English
- Suboptimal adherence, defined as a score of 15 or less on three Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale (MOS SAS) items related to adherence to medications, diet, and exercise.
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive disorder precluding informed consent or meaningful participation in the PP exercises, assessed using a six-item cognitive screen developed for research.
- Lack of telephone access
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Related Publications (1)
DuBois CM, Millstein RA, Celano CM, Wexler DJ, Huffman JC. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Positive Psychological Intervention for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2016 May 5;18(3):10.4088/PCC.15m01902. doi: 10.4088/PCC.15m01902. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27733954DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeff C Huffman, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Attending Psychiatrist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2016
First Posted
April 13, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 13, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share