Clinical Study 3MESPE Crowns
Clinical Pilot Study of: Astringent Retraction Paste, Imprint™ 4 VPS, Imprint 4™ Preliminary, Intra-oral Syringes, 3M ESPE New Temporary Restoration (SuPro 100 and Temporary Cement), RelyX™ Unicem™ 2 Automix Cement, Lava™ Plus Zirconia Crowns
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical study seeks to address four independent questions that are all part of the delivery of care associated with the provision of a single item of treatment; an indirect restoration (known as a 'crown') to restore and cover a damaged tooth. The provision of a crown requires a series of sequential clinical and laboratory stages stages:
- 1.Stage 1 - Preliminary impression. Taking a pre-operative impression of the tooth to be crowned. This will be used to enable the fabrication of the temporary crown after the tooth has been prepared. This is standard care and follows established clinical protocols.
- 2.Stage 2 - Preparation of the tooth. This involves cutting the tooth back to make space for the crown that will be fabricated to replace the missing structure.
- 3.Stage 3 - Taking an impression of the prepared tooth. From this a duplicate model will be made to fabricate the crown. To take the impression, the dentist will need to gently push the gums away from the tooth by fractions of a millimeter so that the margins of the preparation are clearly discernible.
- 4.Stage 4 - Provision of a temporary restoration that will provide satisfactory function for a limited period of time, until the definitive crown can be fitted. This temporary crown is designed to have a finite short-term durability and have an ease of manufacture and subsequent removal; hence the use of a specific cement that will enable this.
- 5.Stage 5 - Fitting of the definitive restoration. This is designed to be a durable restoration, with a mean life expectancy measured in years, but which is ultimately determined by a number of clinical, biological and patient specific parameters. Definitive restorations are fitted with cement designed to retain the crown in permanent manner.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2021
CompletedSeptember 11, 2019
September 1, 2019
4.5 years
March 1, 2016
September 10, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of the predictability
Assessment of the predictability of results as a function of accuracy of the resulting model, the dentist's judgment on the quality of impression and the accuracy of fit of the definitive restoration (Lava™ Plus Zirconia crown). Predictability is defined as the frequency in which an adequate result is obtained in a consistent manner
48 months
Study Arms (2)
Innovation treatment 3M ESPE materials
OTHERThe Innovation treatment arm will receive the innovation treatment first and then crossover to receive the standard clinical practice treatment during the Impression intervention. Materials to be used all 3M ESPE - Astringent Retraction Paste, Imprint™ 4 Preliminary, Imprint™4 VPS, Imprint™ 4 Bite, Intra-oral syringes, Impression Tray,
standard clinical practice treatment
OTHERThe standard clinical practice treatment will receive the standard clinical practice treatment first and then crossover to receive the innovation treatment during the Impression intervention Materials as per the operating dentist's choice to be recorded on CRF
Interventions
The 1st intervention will compare two clinical impression techniques The Innovation treatment arm will receive the innovation treatment first and then crossover to receive the standard clinical practice treatment. The standard clinical practice treatment will receive the standard clinical practice treatment first and then crossover to receive the innovation treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients in need of at least one full-coverage posterior restoration (crown) in a permanent premolar or molar.
- If two teeth in opposing arches are in need of a full-coverage posterior restoration (crown) only the tooth or teeth in one arch will be included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are unable to give informed consent or vulnerable population as defined in ISO 14155 will not be enrolled.
- Patients with contraindications as described in the 'Instructions for Use' of the study materials
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trustlead
- 3M ESPEcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Sheffield NHS Trust
Sheffield, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicolas Martin, Professor
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2016
First Posted
April 12, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2021
Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Last Updated
September 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
no plans to share data