Study Stopped
Difficulties with recruitment due to change in referral rates.
To Compare Conservative Management Vs. Balloon Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of VCFs in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
MELODY
Multiple Myeloma Spinal Disease Study; A Multi-centre, Prospective, Single Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Study to Compare Conservative Management Alone Vs. Balloon Kyphoplasty With the Treatment of VCFs in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
1 other identifier
interventional
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether surgical treatment, balloon kyphoplasty is more effective compared to conservative treatment alone (sham procedure) when assessing clinical, translational, radiological \& patient outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Subjects will be recruited to the study if they have VAS score ≥ 6 and has given informed consent to participate in the Melody Study will be randomised to Arm 1 Sham Procedure and Conservative treatment or Arm 2 Balloon Kyphoplasty and Conservative treatment. Subjects recruited to Arm 1 (Sham Procedure and Conservative treatment) can cross over into Arm 2 (Balloon Kyphoplasty and Conservative Treatment) if they have a VAS score ≥ 6 between 8-12 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable multiple-myeloma
Started Jun 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable multiple-myeloma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 9, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 28, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 28, 2018
CompletedApril 6, 2018
April 1, 2018
10 months
November 3, 2014
April 4, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the effect of sham procedure & conservative management alone (arm 1) versus balloon kyphoplasty (arm 2) on patient reported pain scores as assessed by VAS (at week 4)
At week 4
Secondary Outcomes (5)
the effect of conservative management alone versus balloon kyphoplasty on patient reported pain scores as assessed by VAS (at weeks 1, 8, 12, 16, 26, year 1 and year 2)
At week 1, 8, 12, 26, year 1 and year 2
the pain relief requirements of conservative management alone versus balloon kyphoplasty using a daily pain diary (capturing usage of pain relief by type)
At week 1, 8, 12, 26, year 1 and year 2
the effect of conservative management alone versus balloon kyphoplasty on patient reported Quality Of Life outcomes
At week 1, 8, 12, 26, year 1 and year 2
procedure related complications of conservative management alone versus balloon kyphoplasty
At week 1, 8, 12, 26, year 1 and year 2
the cost utility of the conservative management alone versus the balloon kyphoplasty
at 2 years
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1 - Sham Procedure
SHAM COMPARATORSham Procedure \& Conservative Treatment Subjects will be blinded and randomised to Arm 1 and will undergo a general anaesthetic and undergo a sham procedure. They will also be treated under conservative management alone. Below is a list of the conservative management they will be managed by their Doctor: 1. Bisphosphonates 2. Pain relief 3. Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease 4. Bed rest 5. Radiotherapy 6. Physiotherapy This is a non interventional as conservative treatment (standard of care for multiple myeloma patients) is used.
Arm 2 - Balloon Kyphoplasty
ACTIVE COMPARATORBalloon Kyphoplasty \& Conservative Treatment - Interventional Arm Subjects will be blinded and randomised to Arm 2 (balloon kyphoplasty) and will undergo a general anaesthetic and undergo a balloon kyphoplasty surgical procedure. They will also be treated with conservative management. Below is a list of the conservative management they will be managed by their Doctor: 1. Bisphosphonates 2. Pain relief 3. Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease 4. Bed rest 5. Radiotherapy 6. Physiotherapy This is a interventional arm (balloon kyphoplasty procedure) and the patient will receive conservative treatment (standard of multiple myeloma patients) is used.
Interventions
Arm 2 Balloon Kyphoplasty (Medtronic LCC) and Conservative Treatment Subjects will be blinded and randomised to Arm 2 and will undergo a general anaesthetic and undergo a balloon kyphoplasty surgical procedure. They will also be treated with conservative management. Below is a list of the conservative management they will be managed by their Doctor: 1. Bisphosphonates 2. Pain relief 3. Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease 4. Bed rest 5. Radiotherapy 6. Physiotherapy
Patients recruited to Arm 1 and Arm 2 will undergo conservative management for Multiple Myeloma recommended by their Consultant Hematologist. * Concomitant treatment with bisphosphonates * Pain relief as required * Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease * Bed rest * Radiotherapy * Physiotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 and ≤80 years old
- Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma
- Confirmed acute (MRI, a detectable low signal T1 ± oedema) painful vertebral compression fracture(s) VAS score is ≥6
- The patient is able to read and understand the Patient Information Sheet and study procedures
- The patient is able and willing to give written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to anaesthesia
- Cord Compression or large epidural mass necessitating conservative management before balloon kyphoplasty
- Pain unrelated to vertebral collapse
- Infection at the site
- Presence of overt instability as judged by the principle investigator
- Known pregnancy at time of screening
- Severe Cardiopulmonary insufficiency
- Osteoblastic lesions
- Any co-morbidity, (e.g., diabetes, heart condition, obesity, psychiatric illness) which, in the opinion of the investigator, is of a severe enough nature to; interfere with the patient's ability to complete the study assessments; or present an unacceptable risk to the patient's safety to undergo study treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Royal National Orthopaedic NHS Trust, Brockley Hill
Stanmore, UK, HA7 4LP, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chara Kyriakou, MD PhD
RNOH
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sean Molloy, FRCS MSc
RNOH
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Research Innovation Centre
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2014
First Posted
April 11, 2016
Study Start
June 9, 2017
Primary Completion
March 28, 2018
Study Completion
March 28, 2018
Last Updated
April 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04