The Efficacy of Cranial Electrostimulating Therapy for Depression and Anxiety Among Homeless Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a trial of the use of cranial electrostimulating therapy for depression and anxiety among homeless adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable depression
Started Mar 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 16, 2018
September 1, 2018
3 months
March 23, 2016
January 24, 2017
September 21, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Depressive Symptoms
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression is a multiple item questionnaire used to provide an indication of depression and as a guide to evaluate recovery (Hedlund, 1979). The questionnaire is designed for adults and is used to rate the severity of their depression by probing mood, feelings of guilt, suicide ideation, insomnia, agitation or retardation, anxiety, weight loss, and somatic symptoms. A score of 0-7 is considered to be normal. Scores of 20 or higher indicate moderate, severe, or very severe depression, and are usually required for entry into a clinical trial. Assessment time is estimated at 20 minutes (Hamilton, 1960). Higher values represent a worse outcome. The HAM-D form lists 21 items, the scoring is based on the first 17.Eight items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe. Nine are scored from 0-2, with a total score range of 0-50.
4 weeks
Anxiety
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale. The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) is a psychological questionnaire used by clinicians to rate the severity of a patient's anxiety (Hamilton, 1959; McDowell, Newell \& \& McDowell, 2006). The scale consists of 14 items designed to assess the severity of a patient's anxiety. Each of the 14 items contains a number of symptoms, and each group of symptoms is rated on a scale of zero to four, with four being the most severe (with a total score range of 0-56). All of these scores are used to compute an overarching score that indicates a person's anxiety severity (Vaccarino, 2008). A score of 17 or less indicates mild anxiety severity. A score from 18 to 24 indicates mild to moderate anxiety severity. Lastly, a score of 25 to 30 indicates a moderate to severe anxiety severity. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Sham Device
SHAM COMPARATORSham device
Intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORCES device. cranial electrotherapy stimulation device. Alpha Stim device
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Competent (no legal guardian) males and females between the ages of 18 to 64
- Currently homeless or recent experience of homelessness, and symptoms of anxiety or depression
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than 18 and older than 65
- Patients who have attempted suicide with within the past twelve months or have active suicidal ideation will be excluded for possible safety concerns
- Self-reported illegal substance use in the past 30 days. Recent use of nicotine and alcohol will be allowed. However, those with current intoxication will be excluded
- History of a seizure disorder.
- Current history of autoimmune or endocrine disorder affecting the brain, unstable cardiac disease, history of skull fracture, or craniotomy
- Patients with pacemakers or internal electronic devices like deep brain stimulation and cochlear implants
- Women who are pregnant, nursing or planning to become pregnant
- Diagnosis of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27117, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Data analyses done usually only matched pairs.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- James Kimball, MD
- Organization
- Wake Forest Health Sciences
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Kimball, MD
Wake Forest Health Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2016
First Posted
April 8, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 16, 2018
Results First Posted
May 1, 2017
Record last verified: 2018-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share