Using Emotion Regulation to Decrease Aggression in Veterans With PTSD
(EMDA)
CAP - Using Emotion Regulation to Decrease Aggression in Veterans With PTSD
2 other identifiers
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Impulsive aggression (IA) is common among Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and PTSD is one of the most prevalent post deployment mental health conditions affecting Afghanistan and Iraq Veterans. An inability to manage one's emotions (emotion dysregulation) is an underlying mechanism of IA. Reducing IA and increasing use of PTSD evidence-based psychotherapies are two critical missions for the Veterans Health Administration. This research supports these missions by providing a 3-session emotion regulation training (Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression) to Veterans in order to teach them how to manage emotions and prepare for PTSD treatment. This is an open trail, so all Veterans who meet the inclusion criteria will be allowed to receive the treatment. Each Veteran's level of aggression and emotion dysregulation will be measured at the beginning and end to the treatment. By enhancing Veterans' abilities to cope with trauma-related emotions and feel equipped to initiate PTSD treatments, this research aims to help Veterans decrease IA and ultimately recover from PTSD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 13, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 7, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 7, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 19, 2019
CompletedSeptember 17, 2019
September 1, 2019
1.7 years
March 18, 2016
March 28, 2019
September 6, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Overt Aggression Scale
The Overt Aggression Scale (OAS) is a 17-item self-report measure that assesses frequency of different aggression acts, including verbal and physical aggression against self, other, and objects. Theoretical minimum score = 0; there is no bounded maximum value. Higher values = greater frequency of aggression.
Given 3 weeks after last MERA session. Assess aggressive events in past week.
Total Score Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a 36- item self-report measure with 6 different emotion-dysregulation factors: nonacceptance of emotional responses, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors, impulse-control difficulties, lack of emotional awareness, limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and lack of emotional clarity. Total score was used in this study. Theoretical minimum value = 36; theoretical maximum value = 180. Higher scores indicate worse emotion regulation.
Given 3 weeks after last MERA session. Assess emotion dysregulation in past month.
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
ERQ is a 10-item self-report measure with 2 factors that assess specific emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal (6 items; changing the way one thinks about a situation) and expressive suppression (4 items; not expressing the emotion outwardly but feeling it internally). More effective emotion regulation is indicated by higher cognitive reappraisal scores and lower expressive suppression scores. Theoretical minimum score for cognitive reappraisal = 6; theoretical maximum score = 42. Theoretical minimum score for expressive suppression = 4; theoretical maximum score = 28.
Given 3 weeks after last MERA session. Assess emotion regulation strategies used in past week.
Exit Interview - Ratings of Therapist and Treatment
The exit interview was created by the study team and has 3 questions that asks: 1.) how understanding the therapist was, 2.) how helpful the therapist was in learning skills, and 3.) how helpful MERA was in managing emotions. Scale for all questions: * 1 = Not at all understanding / helpful * 2 = A little bit understanding / helpful * 3 = Moderately understanding / helpful * 4 = Very understanding / helpful Higher scores reflect greater understanding or helpfulness.
Given 3 weeks after last MERA session.
Exit Interview - Use of Skills
The exit interview was created by the study team and has 8 questions that asks: 1.) "Are you using \_\_\_\_\_skill?". Scores = percentage of the sample that was using the skill during the week before the post treatment assessment. Percentages could range from 0% to 100% of the sample. Higher scores represent more of the sample using the skill.
Given 3 weeks after last MERA session. Assess emotion regulation strategies used in past week.
Study Arms (1)
Open Trial
OTHERAll Veterans will receive the same emotion regulation treatment titled, Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression.
Interventions
MERA is a 3-session group treatment that teaches Veterans the purpose of emotions, how trauma and combat can increase emotions, and how to better regulate them. The skills use cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness techniques to help Veteran better regulate their emotions. These skills are commonly used in clinical practice, but have not been delivered in 3 sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male Veteran who served in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF)/Operation New Dawn (OND)
- Currently meets criteria for a PTSD diagnosis, determined by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale-5
- Engaged in at least 3 self-reported impulsive aggression acts in the last month, measured by the Overt Aggression Scale.58:
- yelling
- throwing objects
- hitting objects/people in the last month
- Impulsive aggression is his/her primary form of aggression, determined by having a higher Impulsive Aggression subscore than a Premeditated Aggression subscore on the Impulsive Premeditated Aggression Scale
- Because aggressors are poor historians when reporting their aggression frequency, each Veteran must agree to allow an independent aggression rater (live-in partner, family member, or roommate) verify the number of aggressive acts, using the Overt Aggression Scale
- No psychotropic medication change for six weeks prior to the assessment and agreement not to ask for a medication change for the duration of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Veterans who meet the following criteria will be excluded:
- Previously began Prolonged Exposure (PE) or Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
- Is currently suicidal with intent of self-harm in the last week
- Is currently homicidal with plans to hurt a specific person
- Is unable to complete self-report measures
- Does not have an independent aggression rater
- Has severe alcohol consumption patterns (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test), severe drug use consumption patterns (Drug Use Disorders Identification Test), active psychosis, or mania (MINI)
- Had a psychotropic medication change within 6 weeks prior to the pretraining assessment. Veterans receiving general mental health services or non- PE or CPT psychotherapy will be allowed to participate in this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Shannon Miles
- Organization
- James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shannon R. Miles, PhD
James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2016
First Posted
March 31, 2016
Study Start
June 13, 2016
Primary Completion
February 7, 2018
Study Completion
February 7, 2018
Last Updated
September 17, 2019
Results First Posted
August 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share