NCT02723266

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to modify an existing Reproductive Health intervention for adolescents with diabetes for Gestational Diabetes and make it culturally appropriate American Indian/Alaska Native adolescents. The intervention will then be evaluated for effectiveness in AI/AN female teens at risk for GDM.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
398

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 1, 2016

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 30, 2016

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 16, 2018

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 24, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

March 1, 2016

Last Update Submit

October 22, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

American Indian, Alaska Native AdolescentsPreconception CounselingReproductive HealthGestational Diabetes Mellitus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Reproductive Health Behaviors

    Family-Planning Vigilance Behavior are defined as using effective family planning/abstinence, seeking PC, and initiating discussion with health care professionals . "Effective family planning behaviors" is a weight summary of the teen's most frequently used contraception. Weights will be derived using the annual failure rates for methods of contraception reported in Trussell's algorithm. Rates are transformed into probabilities of failure (0 to 1), 0 = no failure. Overall effectiveness of contraception is computed as 1-Pr \[Failure\]. Combination methods (\> 2 jointly) is the product of the failure probability of the individual methods used jointly. For multiple methods used singly, the overall probability of failure will be computed as the average of the failure probabilities. Subjects who were never sexually active will be given a failure probability of zero

    15 months

  • Beliefs and Attitudes

    Beliefs/attitudes Reproductive Health and Diabetes Questionnaire (EHBM scale) Based on the EHBM,\[53, 76, 82\] perceived susceptibility (9 items) and perceived severity (7), perceived benefits (12) of and barriers (15), and self-efficacy (18) (confidence to use FPV); Likert-type (1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree).\[76\] Each construct has a composite score; higher= stronger attitudes. (alphas: susceptibility = .74; severity = .94; benefit = .88; barriers = .97; self-efficacy = .96

    15 months

  • Knowledge/Decision-Making

    Knowledge/decision-making Reproductive-health Awareness for Teens with DM Quest (Knowledge scale) Multiple choice, based on 100% correctness, subscales: diabetes and pregnancy (28 items); contraception (5); sexuality (7); puberty (3); PC (25); and general family planning (8) (Cronbach alpha .71; test-retest reliability r= 0.76). Split-half differentiates pre- from post-test

    15 Months

  • Social Support

    Social Support Reproductive Health and Diabetes Q. (Social Support scale) Social support is the process by which help is obtained from the social network (e.g., mothers/ female guardian) to meet one's needs. Support measure for mothers is the perceived actual support (emotional, appraisal, informational, and instrumental)\[54\] they provided to their daughters for lifestyle management and family planning vigilance. Daughters' measure is perceived available support from their mother for the same behaviors. Summation score of 9 items with responses, "a lot of help" =7 to "no help at all" =1. Higher scores = greater support. Alpha = .92

    15 months

  • Initiating Discussion

    Initiating Discussions with M-D Initiating Discussion M-D Scale Teens and mothers respond to 4 yes/no items of actual discussions they have had regarding GDM and reproductive health issues (pregnancy, sexuality, birth control and PC

    15 months

  • Lifestyle Management

    Lifestyle Self-Management Lifestyle Self-Management Scale (DM Care Profile) Daughter's adherence is a 3-item scale (1= "not very well done" to 7= "very well done") based on diabetes-prevention self-care management (diet, physical activity, clinic visits).\[84\] Cronbach's alpha from our studies is .75. Culturally-relevant items will be added during Phase 1

    15 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • BMI

    15 months

  • Hemoglobin A1C values to evaluate Glycemic Control

    15 months

  • Number of subjects reporting an unplanned pregnancy

    15 months

Study Arms (2)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Treatment receives the STOPPING-GDM intervention. Control does not receive the intervention.

Behavioral: STOPPING-GDM

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Control does not receive the intervention.

Interventions

STOPPING-GDMBEHAVIORAL

Educational counseling and skills building Intervention

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years - 20 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • females between the ages of 12 to \<20 years
  • at risk for GDM (such as having metabolic syndrome, pre-diabetes, or BMI \> 85%; and an A1C \< 6.5%)
  • fluent in English.
  • natural, adoptive, or step, living with their daughters
  • fluent in English

You may not qualify if:

  • A1C \> 6.5%, \[20, 26\] abnormal Glucose Tolerance Test (GTT),
  • signs and symptoms of diabetes,
  • a history of another chronic illness or mental retardation,
  • pregnant at the time of recruitment.
  • foster mother of an adolescent girl because she may not be a consistent caregiver.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Indian Health Resource Center of Tulsa

Tulsa, Oklahoma, 73114, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Gestational

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesDiabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Nancy O'Bannion, MS

    Indian Health Care Resource Center of Tulsa

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Jeff Powell, MD

    University of Colorado (Shiprock-subcontract )

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2016

First Posted

March 30, 2016

Study Start

March 16, 2018

Primary Completion

September 30, 2019

Study Completion

September 30, 2019

Last Updated

October 24, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

It is our intention to make all data generated from this proposal freely available. The primary mechanism of data dissemination will be through submission of abstracts to regional, national, and international meetings and the submission of manuscripts. The principal investigator will serve as liaison with other investigators in the sharing of additional materials if necessary.

Locations