Comparison of Dysport Reconstitution at 1.5 mL and 2.5 mL for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines
A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center, Subject- and Evaluator-Blinded, Parallel Comparison of Dysport®, When Reconstituted at 1.5 mL and 2.5 mL, for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and subject and investigator satisfaction of 2 different injection volumes of Dysport in the glabellar lines.
- 1.To determine the proportion of composite responders (based on blinded evaluator and subject assessments) who achieve at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in glabellar line severity score (GLSS) at maximum frown line on Day 30.
- 2.To assess the GLSS, at maximum frown and at rest, by live assessment at all visits.
- 3.To evaluate the onset of effect on appearance of glabellar lines starting at the Day 2 visit (subject and blinded evaluator).
- 4.To assess the subject's satisfaction with the treatment.
- 5.To evaluate investigator satisfaction of treatment outcome.
- 6.To evaluate subject psychological well-being.
- 7.To evaluate subject age appraisal.
- 8.To evaluate all adverse events during the course of the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Apr 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 25, 2018
CompletedAugust 1, 2022
September 1, 2018
6 months
March 16, 2016
August 28, 2018
July 28, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Composite Responders Who Achieve at Least a 1-point Reduction From Baseline in Glabellar Line Severity Score (GLSS) at Maximum Frown.
Proportion of composite responders who achieve at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in glabellar line severity score (GLSS) based on subject and blinded-evaluator assessment of glabellar line severity at maximum frown on Day 30.
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Proportion of Responders, at Maximum Frown (Subject)
120 days
Proportion of Responders, at Maximum Frown (Blinded Evaluator)
120 days
Proportion of Responders, at Maximum Frown (Treating Investigator)
120 days
Proportion of Combination Responders, at Maximum Frown (Blinded Evaluator and Subject)
120 days
Proportion of Responders, at Rest (Subject)
120 days
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1.5 mL Reconstitution
EXPERIMENTALSubjects treated with Dysport reconstituted at 1.5 mL (0.05 mL/injection) following the US on-label guidelines, with each subject receiving a single treatment session (50 units \[U\]) at the Day 1 visit.
2.5 mL Reconstitution
EXPERIMENTALSubjects treated with Dysport reconstituted at 2.5 mL (0.08 mL/injection) following the US on-label guidelines, with each subject receiving a single treatment session (50 units \[U\]) at the Day 1 visit.
Interventions
Subjects treated for moderate to severe (GLSS = 2 or 3) glabellar lines at maximum frown.
Subjects treated for moderate to severe (GLSS = 2 or 3) glabellar lines at maximum frown.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Botulinum toxin naïve subject (facial area)
- Moderate to severe (GLSS = 2 or 3) glabellar lines at maximum frown and mild to severe (GLSS = 1, 2, or 3) glabellar lines at rest using the validated 4-point Photographic Scale, as assessed by the treating investigator and the blinded evaluator.
You may not qualify if:
- Have known allergies or sensitivities to Dysport®, any of its excipients, or cow's milk protein
- Have rhytids of the glabellar region that cannot be smoothed out by manually spreading the skin apart
- Have a history or have signs and symptoms of eyelid or brow ptosis or signs of compensatory frontalis muscle activity, as judged by the investigator
- Have clinical or subclinical neuromuscular junctional disorders (eg, myasthenia gravis, Lambert Eaton syndrome, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) or a history of dysphagia or aspiration
- Are women who are pregnant or breast-feeding or who intend to get pregnant within the duration of the study
- Have an active inflammation or infection in the areas to be treated or had any prior surgery, tattoos, piercings, or scarring in the facial area that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the results
- Have had any previous insertion of any permanent or semi-permanent material, hyaluronic acid, or collagen fillers in the glabellar region
- Have any chronic or acute medical condition that, may pose a risk to the safety of the subject, or may interfere with the assessment of safety or efficacy in this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Galderma R&Dlead
Study Sites (3)
AboutSkin Dermatology and DermSurgery
Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States
Skin Research Institute
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Marina Peredo, MD, PC
Smithtown, New York, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jay Mashburn
- Organization
- Galderma Laboratories
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jay Mashburn, PhD
Galderma Laboratories, LP
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2016
First Posted
March 24, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 1, 2022
Results First Posted
September 25, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share