NCT02718040

Brief Summary

This study is designed to

  1. 1.evaluate the naturalness of facial expressions in motion (2D video images), by treating investigator assessment
  2. 2.evaluate naturalness of facial expressions (photographs), by treating investigator assessment
  3. 3.evaluate perceived attractiveness and age of subject (2D videos), by treating investigator assessment
  4. 4.evaluate aesthetic improvement, by subject and treating investigator assessments
  5. 5.evaluate subject satisfaction
  6. 6.evaluate nasolabial fold (NLF) severity, by treating investigator assessment
  7. 7.evaluate marionette lines (MLs) severity, by treating investigator assessment
  8. 8.evaluate dynamic facial strain in animation using 3D digital photogrammetric analysis
  9. 9.evaluate all adverse events reported during the study.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 16, 2016

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 24, 2016

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2016

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 25, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

March 16, 2016

Results QC Date

August 28, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Subjects With Naturalness of Expression in Motion (2D Video)

    Proportion of subjects having at least maintained naturalness of expression in lower face (naturalness is maintained or enhanced) based on 2D video assessment at Day 42, by treating investigator

    42 days

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Number of Subjects With Naturalness of Expression (Photographs)

    42 days

  • Number of Subjects With Naturalness of Expression, Attractiveness AND Younger Appearance (2D Video)

    42 days

  • Number of Subjects Reporting Global Improvement (Subject)

    42 days

  • Number of Subjects Demonstrating Global Improvement (Treating Investigator)

    42 days

  • Number of Subjects Reporting Satisfaction - The Overall Appearance of my Face Looks Natural

    42 days

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Emervel Treatment Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Eligible subjects received bilateral treatment of Nasolabial Folds (NLFs) and Marionette Lines (MLs) with Emervel Classic and/or Emervel Deep

Device: Emervel Classic and/or Deep Treatment Group

Interventions

Severity of Wrinkle Severity treated by product type: Emervel Classic: Nasolabial Folds (NLFs): Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) = 2/2, 2/3 or 3/3; Marionette Lines (MLs): Wrinkle Assessment Scale (WAS) = 2/2, 2/3 or 3/3 Emervel Deep Nasolabial Folds (NLFs): Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) = 3/3, 3/4 or 4/4; Marionette Lines (MLs): Wrinkle Assessment Scale (WAS) = 3/3, 3/4 or 4/4 Both products may be used in the same subject, but only in different anatomic locations. The same study product should be used within the same wrinkle or fold type (e.g., left and right NLFs treated with the same product)

Emervel Treatment Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Seeking correction of bilateral NLFs: severe (i.e., bilateral WSRS = 3-4) or moderate (i.e., bilateral WSRS = 2-3) AND bilateral MLs: severe (i.e., WAS = 3-4) or moderate (i.e., WAS = 2-3).
  • Subjects of childbearing potential who agree to use medically accepted methods of contraception during the study and for 30 days following study completion.
  • Intent to undergo optimal correction of bilateral NLFs and MLs. Optimal correction is defined as the best possible aesthetic outcome as agreed to by the treating investigator and subject.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject who presents with a severity of wrinkles or folds that require other treatments, e.g. laser treatment, chemical peeling, to achieve optimal correction.
  • Previous facial surgery, including aesthetic facial surgical therapy, liposuction or tattoo, in the treatment area.
  • Previous tissue augmenting therapy or contouring with permanent or non-permanent filler or fat-injection in the facial area.
  • Previous tissue revitalization treatment with neurotoxin in the facial area within 6 months before treatment.
  • Known/previous allergy or hypersensitivity to any injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) gel.
  • Known/previous allergy or hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics, e.g. lidocaine or other amide-type anaesthetics.
  • Known/previous allergy or hypersensitivity to gram-positive bacterial proteins.
  • Other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the treating investigator's opinion, e.g. subjects not likely to avoid other facial cosmetic treatments, subjects anticipated to be unreliable, unavailable or incapable of understanding the study assessments or having unrealistic expectations of the treatment result.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jay Mashburn
Organization
Galderma Laboratories

Study Officials

  • Jay Mashburn

    Galderma Laboratories

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2016

First Posted

March 24, 2016

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

July 1, 2016

Study Completion

August 1, 2016

Last Updated

August 1, 2022

Results First Posted

September 25, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share