Promoting Health Knowledge Among University Students
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: The interactions between human beings and wearable technology like activity trackers equipped with biometric sensors can be linked to health related new learning concepts/instructional methods supporting deep knowledge acquisition, situated, self-regulated and active learning. This personalized, long term interactions where specific information is pushed to the learner contributes to deepen the personal understanding related to the concept of and knowledge about health and has an impact on long term health action process. Design and methods: In order to understand the behavioural change process, a multiple case study including 35 higher education students in Hong Kong from an undergraduate course, BSc Exercise and Health is currently conducted. Each student uses a wearable device (activity tracker) over a period of five months, reflects weekly on emerging personal data, documents their thinking and action in the ePortfolio, and engages in an online forum. The participants enter their experiences with the biometric data, lifestyle adaptations (e.g. more steps), special situations (e.g. hike, heart rate changes during activity) and how these experiences lead to specific searches and actions on the web and/or in their real social network. The ePortfolio will allow the students to critically reflect on their progress and for the researchers to intervene at any time on the issues related to the participants' postings. EHealth literacy is used as indicator for the health action process of the participants. Evidence regarding change in eHealth at the beginning and end of the intervention will be collected with a standard questionnaire detecting eHealth their literacy scale. Scope: By reflecting on the information from their personal activity tracker and documenting it in their own ePortfolio, the students will continuously learn to analyse, search and critically assess health related personal and available digital information, organize it, present and discuss it with peers/tutor. This in turn will enhance critical thinking, raise questions about health related topics, stimulate further inquiry deepen their knowledge about personal health, inducing a healthier lifestyle.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 23, 2016
March 1, 2016
4 months
March 11, 2016
March 22, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Physical activity levels
Number of steps recorded from the Activity tracker
5 months
light sleep length
Daily duration of light sleep in hours
5 months
deep sleep length
\- Daily duration of deep sleep in hours
5 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
eHealth literacy quantity
5 months
Study Arms (1)
Biometrical Tracker
OTHERThe participants are equipped with an wrist watch. The activity tracker measures biometrical information like, steps, sleep duration and heart rate.
Interventions
35 participants are wearing a activity, sleep and heart rate tracker day and night time over a period of 5 month. The wrist watch is equipped with accelerometer, heart rate monitor using oximetry sensor, 3 led lights and vibrating alarm. The tracker is connected over Bluetooth with a smartphone App displaying the measured values and permitting to show different statistics related to amount of steps, sleep duration and heart rate over days, weeks and months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age over 18 years
- University Students
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, 000, Hong Kong
Related Publications (14)
Bonwell, C.& J. A. Eison,J. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. George Washington University.
BACKGROUNDBrown, J., Collins, A, Dugid, P. (1998). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher.18:32-42.
BACKGROUNDCreswell, W.J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
BACKGROUNDFlyvbjerg, B (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219-45.
BACKGROUNDJanesick, V.J. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 379-399). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
BACKGROUNDSavolainen, J. (1994). The rationality of drawing big conclusions based on small samples. Social Forces 72: 1217-24.
BACKGROUNDScardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge Building. In Encyclopedia of Education. (2nd ed., pp. 1370-1373). New York: Macmillan Reference, USA.
BACKGROUNDSchwarzer, R. (2008). Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(1), 1-29.
BACKGROUNDSmall, M. (2009). How many cases do I need? On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography 10(1): 5-38.
BACKGROUNDStake, R. (2003). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd Ed., pp. 134-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
BACKGROUNDStellefson M, Hanik B, Chaney B, Chaney D, Tennant B, Chavarria EA. eHealth literacy among college students: a systematic review with implications for eHealth education. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 1;13(4):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1703.
PMID: 22155629BACKGROUNDYin, R.K. (1989). Case study research: design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
BACKGROUNDWHO (2006). Bridging the "Know-Do" Gap Meeting on Knowledge Translation in Global Health. Organized by the Departments of: Knowledge Management and Sharing (KMS) Research Policy and Cooperation (RPC). http://www.who.int/kms/WHO_EIP_KMS_2006_2.pdf .
BACKGROUNDZimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2016
First Posted
March 23, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03