Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)-Related Attention Deficits in Children
TBIC
Treatment Outcomes With Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (Vyvanse) in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Attention Deficits
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate whether Vyvanse, a psychostimulant, can help children ages 6-16 with attention deficits due to traumatic brain injury (TBI). Vyvanse is currently approved for the treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity (ADHD). The exact effects this drug may have on adults with attention deficits caused by TBI have been investigated prior. The exact effects this drug may have on children with attention deficits caused by TBI are not known, but the investigators expect that Vyvanse will be of some help in treating this population as well.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Feb 2017
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 13, 2020
CompletedJuly 13, 2020
June 1, 2020
2.4 years
March 8, 2016
June 26, 2020
June 26, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (17)
Assessing Severity of Symptoms Associated With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Conners-3 Parent Form
The Conners-3 Parent Form is used to obtain the parent's observations about behavior in their child aged 6 to 18 years old. Parents rate the child's behavior on 45 items as not true at all (0) to very much true (3). The lowest scale score is 0 (better behavior) and the highest is 135 (worse behavior). The Conners 3-P includes content Scales of Inattention, Hyperactivity/Impulsivity, Learning Problems, Executive Functioning, Aggression, and Peer/Family Relations. Inattention scale was reported as the Primary Outcome. All scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).
12 weeks
Assessing Executive Functioning in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENT
The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior "never" (=1), "sometimes" (=2), or "often" (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). GEC was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).
12 weeks
Assessing Inattentiveness in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Omissions on the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).
Conner's Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II) measures sustained attention and response inhibition. During the CPT-II, letters were presented serially on a screen in a random order. All letters were considered target stimuli, except for the letter 'X' which is a non-target stimulus. Participants responded to target stimuli by pressing the space bar of a computer keyboard (90% of the stimuli) while withholding responses to non-target stimuli (10% of the test). Omission errors represented the number of times a participant fails to respond to target letters (all other than 'X'). Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Higher scores indicate greater inattentiveness.
12 weeks
Assessing Physical Symptoms in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Anxiety on the Revised Child Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS)
RCMAS is a self-report, 37-item questionnaire in which children agree (yes = 1) or disagree (no =0) to statements about themselves. A Total Anxiety score is computed based on 28 items, which are divided into 3 anxiety subscales: physiological anxiety (10 items), worry/oversensitivity (11 items), and social concerns/concentration (7 items). The remaining nine items on the RCMAS constitute the Lie (social desirability) subscale. The lowest scale score is 0 and the highest is 37. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Because scores are derived from affirmative responses, a high score indicates a high level of anxiety or lie on that subscale.
12 weeks
Assessing Total Symptoms in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Anxiety on the Revised Child Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS)
RCMAS is a self-report, 37-item questionnaire in which children agree (yes = 1) or disagree (no =0) to statements about themselves. A Total Anxiety score is computed based on 28 items, which are divided into 3 anxiety subscales: physiological anxiety (10 items), worry/oversensitivity (11 items), and social concerns/concentration (7 items). The remaining nine items on the RCMAS constitute the Lie (social desirability) subscale. The lowest scale score is 0 and the highest is 37. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Because scores are derived from affirmative responses, a high score indicates a high level of anxiety or lie on that subscale.
12 weeks
Assessing Attention Problems in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Symptoms on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a widely used caregiver report form identifying problem behavior in children. The patient is rated on 113 items scored on a 3-point Likert scale (0=not true; 1=somewhat/sometimes true; 2=very true/often true). CBCL consists of eight empirically-based syndrome subscales. The range of subscale scores (summed) are: Aggressive Behavior (0-36), Anxious/Depressed (0-26), Attention Problems (0-20), Rule-Breaking Behavior (0-34), Somatic Complaints (0-22), Social Problems (0-22), Thought Problems (0-30), and Withdrawn/Depressed (0-16). Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
12 weeks
Assessing Anxiety-Depression Problems in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Symptoms on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a widely used caregiver report form identifying problem behavior in children. The patient is rated on 113 items scored on a 3-point Likert scale (0=not true; 1=somewhat/sometimes true; 2=very true/often true). CBCL consists of eight empirically-based syndrome subscales. The range of subscale scores (summed) are: Aggressive Behavior (0-36), Anxious/Depressed (0-26), Attention Problems (0-20), Rule-Breaking Behavior (0-34), Somatic Complaints (0-22), Social Problems (0-22), Thought Problems (0-30), and Withdrawn/Depressed (0-16). Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
12 weeks
Assessing Inhibitory Control in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo Utilizing the Inhibit Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior "never" (=1), "sometimes" (=2), or "often" (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Inhibit was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).
12 weeks
Assessing Ability to Tolerate Change in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Utilizing the Shift Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior "never" (=1), "sometimes" (=2), or "often" (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Shift was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).
12 weeks
Assessing Ability to Begin Tasks in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Utilizing the Initiate Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior "never" (=1), "sometimes" (=2), or "often" (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Initiate was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).
12 weeks
Assessing Representational Memory in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Utilizing the Working Memory Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior "never" (=1), "sometimes" (=2), or "often" (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Working Memory was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).
12 weeks
Assessing Task-oriented Monitoring in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Utilizing the Monitor Subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior "never" (=1), "sometimes" (=2), or "often" (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Monitor was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).
12 weeks
Assessing Behavior Regulation in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring the Behavior Regulation Index (BRI) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior "never" (=1), "sometimes" (=2), or "often" (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Behavior Regulation was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).
12 weeks
Assessing Cognitive Regulation in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring the Cognitive Regulation Index (CRI) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior "never" (=1), "sometimes" (=2), or "often" (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Cognitive Regulation was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).
12 weeks
Assessing Emotion Regulation in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring the Emotion Regulation Index (ERI) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - PARENTS
The BRIEF Parent Questionnaire is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of 8 clinical scales that measure different aspects of executive functioning (Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials, Monitor, Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control). For each item, parents rate whether the child engages in the behavior "never" (=1), "sometimes" (=2), or "often" (=3). The lowest scale score is 86 (better performance) and the highest is 258 (worse performance). The clinical scales form two broader Indexes (Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition) and an overall score, the Global Executive Composite (GEC). Emotion regulation was reported as the Primary Outcome. Raw scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).
12 weeks
Assessing Hyperactivity in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Conners-3 Parent Form
The Conners-3 Parent Form is used to obtain the parent's observations about behavior in their child aged 6 to 18 years old. Parents rate the child's behavior on 45 items as not true at all (0) to very much true (3). The lowest scale score is 0 (better behavior) and the highest is 135 (worse behavior). The Conners 3-P includes content Scales of Inattention, Hyperactivity/Impulsivity, Learning Problems, Executive Functioning, Aggression, and Peer/Family Relations. Hyperactivity was reported as the Primary Outcome. All scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).
12 weeks
Assessing Executive Functioning in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Conners-3 Parent Form
The Conners-3 Parent Form is used to obtain the parent's observations about behavior in their child aged 6 to 18 years old. Parents rate the child's behavior on 45 items as not true at all (0) to very much true (3). The lowest scale score is 0 (better behavior) and the highest is 135 (worse behavior). The Conners 3-P includes content Scales of Inattention, Hyperactivity/Impulsivity, Learning Problems, Executive Functioning, Aggression, and Peer/Family Relations. Executive Functioning was reported as the Primary Outcome. All scores were converted to z-scores (M=0, SD=+/-1).Higher T-scores
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Assessing Executive Functioning in Children When Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Administering the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - CHILD SELF REPORT
12 weeks
Assessing Working Memory and Concentration in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Performance on the Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fifth Edition (WISC-V)
12 weeks
Assessing Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Reaction Time (RT) Standard Error (SE) on the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).
12 weeks
Assessing Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring RT Inter-Stimulus Interval (ISI) on the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).
12 weeks
Assessing Sustained Attention and Response Inhibition in Children Using Vyvanse Versus Placebo by Measuring Hit Reaction Time (RT) Block Change on the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-II).
12 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Vyvanse
ACTIVE COMPARATORLisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse) capsule, 20-70 mg, each morning for 6 weeks.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo capsule, 20-70 mg, each morning for 6 weeks.
Interventions
Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse) capsule, 20-70 mg, each morning for 6 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females ages 6 to 16
- Traumatic brain injury rated as mild/moderate/severe (based on Glasgow Coma Scale, estimated posttraumatic amnesia, indications of intracranial injury on CT scan, etc.)
- Sustained 2-36 months earlier
- Considered to be neurologically stable (absence of post-acute symptoms of confusion, disorientation, etc.)
- Persistent (\> 2 months) problems with focused or sustained attention
- Problems with attention/concentration rated as among the most prominent cognitive changes
- Accompanying features may include diminished arousal/speed/stamina and/or hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms.
You may not qualify if:
- Cases with primarily penetrating head trauma
- Pre-injury history of diagnosed ADHD
- Pre-injury history of other neurodevelopmental disorders including intellectual disabilities, major communication disorders, autism spectrum disorder
- Unstable or serious psychiatric conditions, such as psychotic symptoms. Concurrent problems with depression, anxiety, or post-traumatic stress disorder may be present but are judged to be stable and not so severe as to require pharmacologic treatment
- Treatment with psychotropic medication(s), including psychostimulant(s) within the last 6 months, but eligible thereafter
- Lifetime history of stimulant abuse or dependence. Other (non-stimulant) substance abuse within the past 6 months.
- Estimated intelligence quotient (IQ) \< 70
- Sensory and/or motor impairment(s) seriously limiting testing options
- Neurological conditions including uncontrolled epilepsy, degenerative disorders, brain tumor, or stroke
- Physical condition affecting arousal, activity level, or stamina including uncontrolled thyroid dysfunction, severe or symptomatic anemia, autoimmune or metabolic disorders, untreated moderate/severe sleep apnea, etc.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vanderbilt Universitylead
- Shirecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Tramontana,PhD
- Organization
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael G Tramontana, Ph.D
Vanderbilt University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Neurology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2016
First Posted
March 18, 2016
Study Start
February 6, 2017
Primary Completion
July 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2019
Last Updated
July 13, 2020
Results First Posted
July 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share