NCT02710006

Brief Summary

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of automatic volume calculation of uterine cavity in women with reproductive failures. 3D volumes of uterus and uterine cavity will be acquired during three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography. After that independent observers will measure offline the uterine cavity volume using automatic volume calculation using SonoAVC general software, and VOCAL software.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 6, 2016

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 16, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

September 7, 2016

Status Verified

September 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

March 6, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 6, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

UterusUltrasound

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Concordance correlation coefficient in uterine cavity automated volume calculation

    the concordance correlation coefficient measures the agreement between two variables to evaluate reliability

    up to 12 months

  • Limits of agreement (LoA) in uterine cavity volume estimation

    Limits of agreement are an estimate of the interval within which a proportion of the differences between measurements lie.

    up to 12 months

  • Time needed for acquisition

    Time needed for performing of three-dimensional sonohysterography and for uterine cavity 3D dataset acquisition (time of real-time three-dimensional sonohysterography)

    up to 12 months

  • Time needed for uterine cavity volume analysis

    Time needed for performing of uterine cavity volume calculation in offline analysis

    up to 12 months

Study Arms (1)

SonoHysteroAVC

EXPERIMENTAL

Three-dimensional sonohysterography is the first point for uterine cavity volume estimation, and it is going to be performed in all participants. The investigators are going to fill the uterine cavity twice by saline solution during single sonohysterography procedure, and acquise the volumetric datasets of uterus for offline analysis. The 3D dataset containing the entire uterine cavity will by analyzed using a personal computer and/or the ultrasound machine with specific softwere.

Procedure: Sonohysterography

Interventions

Sonohysterography, also known as saline infusion sonography, is a special, minimally invasive ultrasound technique. Sonohysterography is a technique in which fluid is injected through the cervix into the uterus, and ultrasound is used to. It provides pictures of the inside of a woman's uterus. Three-dimensional sonohysterography is based on volumetric scanning of uterus and its cavity during saline infusion.

Also known as: Saline infusion sonography
SonoHysteroAVC

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 42 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • infertility (12 months trying to conceive without success) and/or two previous miscarriages

You may not qualify if:

  • unknown pregnancy (ultrasound examination)
  • menopause
  • precancerous conditions and cancers of female genital tract
  • refused consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ludwin & Ludwin Gynecology, Specialist Medical Practice Artur Ludwin

Krakow, Malopolska, 31 521, Poland

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Ludwin A, Ludwin I. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Mullerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum Reprod. 2015 Mar;30(3):569-80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu344. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

    PMID: 25534461BACKGROUND
  • Ludwin A, Ludwin I. Diagnostic rate and accuracy of the ESHRE-ESGE classification for septate uterus and other common uterine malformations: why do we not see that the Emperor is naked? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;46(5):634-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.14941. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26525503BACKGROUND
  • Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Kudla M, Pitynski K, Banas T, Jach R, Knafel A. Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional sonohysterography compared with office hysteroscopy and its interrater/intrarater agreement in uterine cavity assessment after hysteroscopic metroplasty. Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.039. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

    PMID: 24581576BACKGROUND
  • Martins WP, Raine-Fenning NJ, Leite SP, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO. A standardized measurement technique may improve the reliability of measurements of endometrial thickness and volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;38(1):107-15. doi: 10.1002/uog.9016. Epub 2011 Apr 28.

    PMID: 21465609BACKGROUND
  • Coelho Neto MA, Roncato P, Nastri CO, Martins WP. True Reproducibility of UltraSound Techniques (TRUST): systematic review of reliability studies in obstetrics and gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;46(1):14-20. doi: 10.1002/uog.14654. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

    PMID: 25175693BACKGROUND
  • Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):371-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.10056.

    PMID: 21830244BACKGROUND
  • Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Brolmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2032-44. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det098. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

    PMID: 23771171BACKGROUND
  • Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, Bermejo C, Amso NN, Nargund G, Timmerman D, Athanasiadis A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Tarlatzis B, Farquharson R, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):2-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev264. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

    PMID: 26537921BACKGROUND
  • Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Kudla M, Kottner J. Reliability of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy and American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification systems for congenital uterine anomalies detected using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Fertil Steril. 2015 Sep;104(3):688-97.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

    PMID: 26158905BACKGROUND
  • Ludwin A, Martins WP, Ludwin I. Uterine cavity imaging, volume estimation and quantification of degree of deformity using automatic volume calculation: description of technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;50(1):138-140. doi: 10.1002/uog.15890. Epub 2017 May 28. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26919726BACKGROUND
  • Streiner DL, Kottner J. Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing. J Adv Nurs. 2014 Sep;70(9):1970-1979. doi: 10.1111/jan.12402. Epub 2014 Mar 30.

    PMID: 24684713BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital DiseasesUrogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Artur Ludwin, MD, PhD

    Ludwin & Ludwin Gynecology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Artur Ludwin MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2016

First Posted

March 16, 2016

Study Start

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion

September 1, 2016

Study Completion

September 1, 2016

Last Updated

September 7, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations