Automatic Volume Calculations During Three-dimensional Sonohysterography.
Feasibility and Reliability of Assessing Uterine Cavity Volume by SonoAVC in Women With Reproductive Failure.
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of automatic volume calculation of uterine cavity in women with reproductive failures. 3D volumes of uterus and uterine cavity will be acquired during three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography. After that independent observers will measure offline the uterine cavity volume using automatic volume calculation using SonoAVC general software, and VOCAL software.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 7, 2016
September 1, 2016
7 months
March 6, 2016
September 6, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Concordance correlation coefficient in uterine cavity automated volume calculation
the concordance correlation coefficient measures the agreement between two variables to evaluate reliability
up to 12 months
Limits of agreement (LoA) in uterine cavity volume estimation
Limits of agreement are an estimate of the interval within which a proportion of the differences between measurements lie.
up to 12 months
Time needed for acquisition
Time needed for performing of three-dimensional sonohysterography and for uterine cavity 3D dataset acquisition (time of real-time three-dimensional sonohysterography)
up to 12 months
Time needed for uterine cavity volume analysis
Time needed for performing of uterine cavity volume calculation in offline analysis
up to 12 months
Study Arms (1)
SonoHysteroAVC
EXPERIMENTALThree-dimensional sonohysterography is the first point for uterine cavity volume estimation, and it is going to be performed in all participants. The investigators are going to fill the uterine cavity twice by saline solution during single sonohysterography procedure, and acquise the volumetric datasets of uterus for offline analysis. The 3D dataset containing the entire uterine cavity will by analyzed using a personal computer and/or the ultrasound machine with specific softwere.
Interventions
Sonohysterography, also known as saline infusion sonography, is a special, minimally invasive ultrasound technique. Sonohysterography is a technique in which fluid is injected through the cervix into the uterus, and ultrasound is used to. It provides pictures of the inside of a woman's uterus. Three-dimensional sonohysterography is based on volumetric scanning of uterus and its cavity during saline infusion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- infertility (12 months trying to conceive without success) and/or two previous miscarriages
You may not qualify if:
- unknown pregnancy (ultrasound examination)
- menopause
- precancerous conditions and cancers of female genital tract
- refused consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ludwin & Ludwin Gynecology, Private Medical Centerlead
- Jagiellonian Universitycollaborator
- University of Sao Paulocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ludwin & Ludwin Gynecology, Specialist Medical Practice Artur Ludwin
Krakow, Malopolska, 31 521, Poland
Related Publications (11)
Ludwin A, Ludwin I. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Mullerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum Reprod. 2015 Mar;30(3):569-80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu344. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
PMID: 25534461BACKGROUNDLudwin A, Ludwin I. Diagnostic rate and accuracy of the ESHRE-ESGE classification for septate uterus and other common uterine malformations: why do we not see that the Emperor is naked? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;46(5):634-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.14941. No abstract available.
PMID: 26525503BACKGROUNDLudwin A, Ludwin I, Kudla M, Pitynski K, Banas T, Jach R, Knafel A. Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional sonohysterography compared with office hysteroscopy and its interrater/intrarater agreement in uterine cavity assessment after hysteroscopic metroplasty. Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.039. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
PMID: 24581576BACKGROUNDMartins WP, Raine-Fenning NJ, Leite SP, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO. A standardized measurement technique may improve the reliability of measurements of endometrial thickness and volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;38(1):107-15. doi: 10.1002/uog.9016. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
PMID: 21465609BACKGROUNDCoelho Neto MA, Roncato P, Nastri CO, Martins WP. True Reproducibility of UltraSound Techniques (TRUST): systematic review of reliability studies in obstetrics and gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;46(1):14-20. doi: 10.1002/uog.14654. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
PMID: 25175693BACKGROUNDChan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):371-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.10056.
PMID: 21830244BACKGROUNDGrimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Brolmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2032-44. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det098. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
PMID: 23771171BACKGROUNDGrimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, Bermejo C, Amso NN, Nargund G, Timmerman D, Athanasiadis A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Tarlatzis B, Farquharson R, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):2-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev264. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
PMID: 26537921BACKGROUNDLudwin A, Ludwin I, Kudla M, Kottner J. Reliability of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy and American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification systems for congenital uterine anomalies detected using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Fertil Steril. 2015 Sep;104(3):688-97.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
PMID: 26158905BACKGROUNDLudwin A, Martins WP, Ludwin I. Uterine cavity imaging, volume estimation and quantification of degree of deformity using automatic volume calculation: description of technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;50(1):138-140. doi: 10.1002/uog.15890. Epub 2017 May 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 26919726BACKGROUNDStreiner DL, Kottner J. Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing. J Adv Nurs. 2014 Sep;70(9):1970-1979. doi: 10.1111/jan.12402. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
PMID: 24684713BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Artur Ludwin, MD, PhD
Ludwin & Ludwin Gynecology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Artur Ludwin MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2016
First Posted
March 16, 2016
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 7, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share