Comparing Gamification With Remote Monitoring Against Standard Rehabilitation, for Patients After Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression Surgery
GAME
A Multi-centre, Randomised, Controlled Study Comparing Gamification With Remote Monitoring Against Standard Rehabilitation, for Patients After Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
71
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This randomised prospective controlled trial will investigate patients with impingement syndrome who undergo arthroscopic subacromial decompression. The intervention group will receive physiotherapy aided by automated sensor-based technology which will help them perform exergames and track their rehabilitation progress. The control group will be treated by standard physiotherapy protocols. The two groups will be compared using patient reported outcome measures and assessment of shoulder range of movement before and after the shoulder surgery. Data will be collected on patient experience, engagement with the rehabilitation process and the usability of the sensor-based technology through the use exergames. This will guide development of methods to quantify patient activation and engagement. Hypothesis:
- 1.There will be a significant clinical difference in post-surgical improvement measured by patient reported outcomes when physiotherapy is aided by automated sensor-based technology to perform Exergames and track progress, compared to standard physiotherapy protocols.
- 2.There will be a significant difference in post-surgical improvement in range of shoulder movement and patient improvement, measured by patient reported out-comes when physiotherapy is aided by automated sensor-based technology to perform exergames and track progress, compared to standard physiotherapy protocols.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2016
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 29, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 5, 2021
October 1, 2021
1.7 years
March 5, 2016
October 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oxford shoulder score
Patients will be assessed for a significant difference in the OSS at 3 at 12 months compared with the treatment as usual group.
3 months and twelve months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score
3 months and 12 months
The European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ5D)
3 months and 12 months
Visual analogue Scale for pain (VAS)
3 months and 12 months
Shoulder range of movement
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Treatment as usual group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients will attend physiotherapy on a weekly basis for assessment (standard physiotherapy). They will be assessed for progression and be provided with a home exercise program. Range of motion in their shoulder will be collected on a weekly basis using the MIRA technology. Patients will be required to complete an exercise diary documenting the exercises performed as well as duration and frequency.
Treatment as usual plus Exergames group
EXPERIMENTALPatients will attend physiotherapy on a weekly basis for assessment (standard physiotherapy). Rather than use a home exercise program patients will be provided with a laptop computer and kinect sensor. they will use the new technology to play 'Exergames' each program will be tailored to the patients progress and patients can play the system as often as they wish. Patients will be required to complete an exercise diary documenting the exercises performed as well as duration and frequency.
Interventions
Following surgery each patient will have a set of games for them to play using their affecting shoulder. These games have been designed by physiotherapists and shoulder surgeons to improve the functional range of movement in their shoulder
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A diagnosis of impingement syndrome based upon history, clinical examination and radiological findings that require arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
- The patient has access to the internet to allow for the remote monitoring element of the intervention.
- The patient needs to be able to use the sensor based technology safely, as judged by the research team.
- The patient is willing to consent to follow-up over a twelve month period.
- The patient has capacity to consent to the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Aged less than 18 or greater than 70
- Patients who are unwilling or unable to consent
- Previous arthroscopic shoulder surgery
- Patients undergoing radiotherapy
- Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes
- Patients not fit for general anaesthetic
- Patients with significant cardiac dysfunction
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Acute illness
- History of stroke / neuromuscular conditions preventing the use of Exergames
- Patient is currently enrolled in another clinical trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Royal Bolton Hospital
Bolton, Lancashire, BL4 OJR, United Kingdom
Trafford General Hospital
Manchester, Lancashire, M45 5SL, United Kingdom
Salford Royal Hospital
Manchester, Lancashire, M6 8HD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (10)
Bigliani LU, Ticker JB, Flatow EL, Soslowsky LJ, Mow VC. The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease. Clin Sports Med. 1991 Oct;10(4):823-38.
PMID: 1934099BACKGROUNDKuhn JE. Exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement: a systematic review and a synthesized evidence-based rehabilitation protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Jan-Feb;18(1):138-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
PMID: 18835532BACKGROUNDJordan KP, Kadam UT, Hayward R, Porcheret M, Young C, Croft P. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jul 2;11:144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-144.
PMID: 20598124BACKGROUNDOlley LM, Carr AJ. The use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 May;90(4):326-31. doi: 10.1308/003588408X285964.
PMID: 18492399BACKGROUNDMaclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. The concept of patient motivation: a qualitative analysis of stroke professionals' attitudes. Stroke. 2002 Feb;33(2):444-8. doi: 10.1161/hs0202.102367.
PMID: 11823650BACKGROUNDKing D, Greaves F, Exeter C, Darzi A. 'Gamification': influencing health behaviours with games. J R Soc Med. 2013 Mar;106(3):76-8. doi: 10.1177/0141076813480996. No abstract available.
PMID: 23481424BACKGROUNDLin RJ, Zhu X. Leveraging social media for preventive care-A gamification system and insights. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;180:838-42.
PMID: 22874310BACKGROUNDCloke DJ, Watson H, Purdy S, Steen IN, Williams JR. A pilot randomized, controlled trial of treatment for painful arc of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1 Suppl):17S-21S. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.005.
PMID: 18069016BACKGROUNDDawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Jul;78(4):593-600.
PMID: 8682827BACKGROUNDBland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.
PMID: 2868172BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bibhas Roy, MB CHB MSC
Central Manchester University Hospitals Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2016
First Posted
March 10, 2016
Study Start
March 29, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share