NCT02598947

Brief Summary

Shoulder impingement syndrome is a very common cause of shoulder pain and normally treated with physiotherapy or surgery. Research has shown that physiotherapy is as effective as surgery, however, the incidence of surgery for this condition is on the rise internationally, nationally and locally. The most effective form of physiotherapy, however, is not known. Laboratory studies have suggested that posterior shoulder tightness may contribute to irritation of the soft tissue around the shoulder joint and perpetuate pain from shoulder impingement syndrome. There is a lack of good quality evidence to support this perspective. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment for posterior shoulder tightness in combination with 'best care' compared with 'best care' alone in individuals with shoulder impingement syndrome. The study will be a randomised, controlled, double blind (patient and assessor), parallel group, feasibility study with 1:1 allocation ratio. Patients awaiting surgery will be assessed for inclusion/exclusion criteria and then randomly allocated into one of two groups. 60 patients will be assigned to receive 'best care' physiotherapy, with or without treatment for posterior shoulder tightness. Physiotherapy treatment will be delivered over 13-15 weeks and outcomes will be assessed at 0, 6-8, 13-15, 26 and 52 weeks. The results will help us to understand if this is an important part of physiotherapy treatment, which might help reduce patient's pain and disability as well as reduce the cost of treatment for the National Health Service.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
49

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 6, 2015

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2016

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 14, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

October 1, 2015

Last Update Submit

January 13, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

posterior shoulder tightnessshoulder impingement syndromeGlenohumeral jointexercise

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (Change)

    Questionnaire relating to pain and disability

    Baseline, 6-8, 13-15, 26 and 52 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • EQ-5D-5L (Change)

    Baseline, 6-8, 13-15, 26 and 52 weeks.

  • Range of motion; glenohumeral internal rotation, low flexion, horizontal adduction (Change). Range will be assessed using purpose built brace (with built in digital inclinometer) and range will be measured in degrees.

    Baseline, 6-8, 13-15 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Posterior shoulder tightness group

EXPERIMENTAL

As well as receiving a strengthening program for the scapular and rotator cuff musculature, subjects allocated to the 'posterior shoulder tightness' treatment group will also receive specific manual therapy and home stretches to address stiffness of the posterior shoulder

Other: Manual therapy

Posterior shoulder tightness sham group

SHAM COMPARATOR

The 'sham posterior shoulder tightness' group will receive the same strengthening program for the scapular and rotator cuff musculature, in addition they will receive home stretches and manual therapy of similar durations to the 'posterior shoulder tightness' group, but delivered to structures that have no known direct structural influence on the posterior shoulder

Other: Manual therapy

Interventions

Exercise, behaviour change interventions and manual therapy

Also known as: Exercise, Education, Behaviour change interventions
Posterior shoulder tightness groupPosterior shoulder tightness sham group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Listed for subacromial decompression surgery by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon
  • Presence of posterior shoulder tightness, based on a positive result in 2 of 3 clinical tests (see below for explanation)
  • Comprehensive in spoken and written English
  • Site of mechanical pain consistent with shoulder impingement syndrome
  • At least 3 months duration of shoulder pain
  • A minimum SPADI score of 20
  • Clinical examination revealing a positive tests for pain with either Neer's test or Hawkins-Kennedy test
  • Using the SEM values obtained from the recent reliability study conducted at the University of Brighton (see appendix 1), side-to-side differences of more than 2×SEM are associated with a 95% probability that the difference is not caused by the inaccuracy of the clinical test. Using the SEM values obtained from this study, it is possible to be 95% confident that the difference identified is not due to an error of measurement when the side-to-side difference is greater than;
  • degrees for horizontal adduction
  • degrees for internal rotation in abduction
  • degrees for low flexion
  • Based on these results a side-to-side difference of 10 degrees or more on two out of three clinical tests will be considered positive for the presence of posterior shoulder tightness.
  • Clustering tests enables the clinician to overcome the inherent weaknesses of individual tests. Making a decision relating to the presence of posterior shoulder tightness on the outcome of a cluster of tests may better reflect the complex anatomy of the posterior shoulder and the multiple layers of connective tissue and muscle acting as passive restraint to movement.

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinically detectable large full thickness rotator cuff tear
  • Recent trauma (last 3 months) involving the shoulder
  • Clinical and radiologically evidence of osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint
  • Symptomatic osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint
  • Adhesive capsulitis (50% deficit of range of movement in 2 or more directions)
  • Malignancy
  • Previous fracture or surgery of the symptomatic shoulder
  • Polyarthritis
  • Past diagnosis of fibromyalgia
  • Rheumatiod arthritis
  • Cervical source of shoulder pain; somatic or radicular (reproduction of familiar shoulder pain during a clinical examination of the cervical spine)
  • Ipsilateral shoulder dislocation in last 2 years
  • Multidirectional instability

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kevin Hall

Shoreham-by-Sea, Sussex, BN43 6TQ, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Bernhardsson S, Klintberg IH, Wendt GK. Evaluation of an exercise concept focusing on eccentric strength training of the rotator cuff for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Clin Rehabil. 2011 Jan;25(1):69-78. doi: 10.1177/0269215510376005. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

    PMID: 20713438BACKGROUND
  • Holmgren T, Hallgren HB, Oberg B, Adolfsson L, Johansson K. Effect of specific exercise strategy on need for surgery in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: randomised controlled study. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;48(19):1456-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-e787rep.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Impingement SyndromeMotor Activity

Interventions

Musculoskeletal ManipulationsExerciseEducational Status

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesShoulder InjuriesWounds and InjuriesBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Complementary TherapiesTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitationMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological PhenomenaSocioeconomic FactorsPopulation Characteristics

Study Officials

  • Kevin Hall, MSc

    Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2015

First Posted

November 6, 2015

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion

July 1, 2020

Study Completion

November 1, 2020

Last Updated

January 14, 2022

Record last verified: 2021-12

Locations