The OPTIMAL Study - A Prospective Cohort of Patients With Bone Metastases of the Long Bones
OPTIMAL
1 other identifier
observational
900
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: Bone metastases arise in 50% of all patients dying from carcinoma, increasing up to 70% in patients with breast and prostate cancer. The lesions can cause pain and fractures, leading to diminished quality of life and poorer survival. Current knowledge concerning adequate, personalized treatment of metastatic lesions of the long bones in patients with disseminated cancer is insufficient and inconclusive due to lack of large, prospective series with patient reported outcome measures. Objective: The OPTIMAL cohort aims to describe the quality of life and pain perception of patients after local treatment (radiotherapy and/or surgery) of metastases of the long bones, for both the entire cohort as well as for specific treatments separately. With this a more personalized treatment for metastases in the long bones based on expected survival and impending fracture risk can be provided in order to improve functioning and the quality of life for the remaining lifetime in patients with disseminated cancer. Study design: Observational, prospective, multicentre cohort study. Study population: All patients with metastases of the long bones visiting a radiation oncologist or orthopaedic surgeon. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoints are patient reported quality of life (including functioning) and pain levels. Complications and survival are secondary endpoints. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients in the OPTIMAL cohort will perhaps not directly benefit from their participation. Participation will contribute to deriving patient-specific treatment modalities for future patients with bone metastases of the long bones. Risks associated with participation in the prospective cohort are considered negligible due to the observational nature of the study. The burden for the patients lies in completion of questionnaires, which is considered to be in proportion with the potential value of this research.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2021
CompletedSeptember 19, 2016
September 1, 2016
2 years
February 25, 2016
September 16, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in quality of life before and after treatment as measured by EQ-5D, EORTC BM-22, and EORTC PAL-15.
The influence on the quality of life of a treatment will be measured by several patient reported outcome scores (EQ-5D, EORTC BM-22, and EORTC PAL-15) at several time points after treatment. These will be used to calculate the changes shortly and longer after treatment.
4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment
Change in pain before and after treatment as measured by an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS)
The influence of a treatment on the pain will be measured by a reported outcome score (NRS) at several time points after treatment. These will be used to calculate the changes shortly and longer after treatment.
4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment
Change in function before and after treatment as measured by the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS).
The influence of a treatment on the function will be measured by a patient reported outcome scores (TESS) at several time points after treatment. These will be used to calculate the changes shortly and longer after treatment.
4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Proportion of participants with overall survival at 6 months
6 months
Proportion of participants with overall survival at 1 year
1 year
Proportion of participants with overall survival at 2 years
2 years
Number of patients with complications as reported by physicians
8 weeks
Number of patients with complications as reported by physicians
6 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Bone metastasis of the long bone
Patients with bone metastases of the long bone(s) receiving surgical stabilisation of a pathologic or impending fracture or receiving radiotherapy for a painful metastasis.
Interventions
Stabilisation of pathological fracture or impending fracture with prosthesis, plate, intramedullary nail, cement, or other stabilisation method
Radiotherapy of bone metastasis, single or multi-fractionated
Eligibility Criteria
All patients visiting the radiation oncologist or the orthopaedic surgeon of participating centres, for possible local treatment of a symptomatic BMLB or impending fracture, will be registered in the OPTIMAL registry. This includes patients with newly diagnosed metastatic bone disease as well as patients undergoing re-treatment of the same lesion or patients who have received previous treatment for other lesions. Preferably patients are included before the start of treatment, but inclusion can also take place during treatment. When patients are already included in the cohort (for treatment of another metastasis), they will not be included a second time when they present with a second lesion of the long bones. This second lesion will be registered under the same patient number.
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 or older
- Radiographic or histologic proof of metastatic bone disease
- Histologic diagnosis of the primary tumour or - if the diagnosis is unknown - at least adequate diagnostic investigations into the origin of the metastasis (e.g. dissemination imaging, histology, biopsy)
- Bone metastasis deriving from the bones of the extremities
You may not qualify if:
- Primary bone tumours (benign and/or malignant)
- No informed consent signed
- Communication with patient is hampered (e.g. language barrier, severe cognitive impairment, dementia)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, 2333ZA, Netherlands
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sander Dijkstra, MD PhD
Leiden University Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yvette van der Linden, MD PhD
Leiden University Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2016
First Posted
March 10, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2018
Study Completion
January 1, 2021
Last Updated
September 19, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share