Multicenter Study of Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Pain Palliation of Bone Metastases
Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Palliation of Painful Skeletal Metastases - a Multicenter Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
3 countries
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Philips Sonalleve Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) device for treating painful bone metastases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedApril 4, 2017
April 1, 2017
4 years
April 24, 2012
April 3, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain response to therapy
Pain is measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire. Patients are categorized into: * Complete response (CR): Pain score 0 without analgesic increase * Partial response (PR): Pain reduction of 2 or more without analgesic increase; or analgesic reduction of 25% without pain increase * Pain Progression (PP): Pain increase of 2 or more with stable analgesic use; or increase of 25% or more in analgesic use, with pain score stable or 1 point above baseline * No response corresponds to all other cases Patients with PR or CR at 30 days are considered responders to therapy.
30 days after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Total number of Adverse Events
within the first 90 days within treatment
Quality of Life (as measured by questionnaire)
at day 0 before treatment, and at 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment
Subgroup analysis: pain response in radiation naïve patients
30 days after treatment
Temporal evolution of pain response during the first 30 days after treatment
during the first 30 days after treatment
Study Arms (1)
MR-HIFU treatment
EXPERIMENTALSubjects undergo a MR-HIFU treatment for pain palliation of bone metastases on their most painful metastasis.
Interventions
A treatment session with the Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU device for bone pain palliation with high-intensity focused ultrasound.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women with age ≥ 18 years
- Patient capable of giving informed consent and able to attend study visits
- Weight \< 140kg
- Radiologic evidence of bone metastases from any solid tumor
- Diagnosis of dominant painful bone metastasis (Numerical Representative Scale (NRS) pain score ≥4), either refractory to standard of care (including radiotherapy and optimal pain medication) or standard of care is contra-indicated or refused by patient.
- Patient has been on stable pain medication for at least 1 week prior to HIFU treatment date
- Pain is localized to the targeted area, or is likely to be referred pain arising from the targeted area
- Patient has 1-3 painful lesions, and only the most painful lesion will be treated
- Intended Target Volume accessible for MR-HIFU procedure
- Target lesion maximum dimension ≤ 8cm
- Intended target volume visible by non-contrast MRI
- Distance between target and skin ≥ 1cm
- Patient is able to communicate sensation during MR-HIFU treatment
- MR-HIFU treatment date ≥ 4 weeks from last local treatment of the target lesion
You may not qualify if:
- Planned treatment lesion is a primary bone tumor or due to lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or leukemia.
- Communication barrier present
- Patient enrolled in another clinical study related to bone metastases treatment or pain relief treatment
- Unable to tolerate required stationary position during treatment
- Need for surgical stabilization in case of (impending) fracture (lytic lesion in weight-bearing bone larger than 50% of bone diameter)
- Pregnant woman
- Pain related to target lesion is predominantly due to fracture or impending fracture
- Pain related to target lesion is due to involvement of a neighboring major nerve by the metastatic tumor (cord or nerve compression)
- Target \< 3cm from bladder / bowel / nerve along the beam path and \< 1cm in the plane orthogonal to the beam
- Target in contact with hollow viscera
- Target located in skull, joints, ribs (when HIFU beam overlapping with lung), spine (excluding sacrum which is allowed) or sternum
- Scar along proposed HIFU beam path
- Internal or external fixation device along the proposed HIFU beam path or at the target
- MRI contraindicated (e.g. paramagnetic implants, pacemaker, claustrophobia)
- MRI contrast agent contraindicated (e.g. previous anaphylaxis or Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \< 30 ml/min/1.73m2)
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, 3508, Netherlands
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Royal Marsden Hospital / Institute of Cancer Research
Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom
Related Publications (7)
Catane R, Beck A, Inbar Y, Rabin T, Shabshin N, Hengst S, Pfeffer RM, Hanannel A, Dogadkin O, Liberman B, Kopelman D. MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for the palliation of pain in patients with bone metastases--preliminary clinical experience. Ann Oncol. 2007 Jan;18(1):163-167. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl335. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
PMID: 17030549BACKGROUNDGianfelice D, Gupta C, Kucharczyk W, Bret P, Havill D, Clemons M. Palliative treatment of painful bone metastases with MR imaging--guided focused ultrasound. Radiology. 2008 Oct;249(1):355-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2491071523. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
PMID: 18695209BACKGROUNDLiberman B, Gianfelice D, Inbar Y, Beck A, Rabin T, Shabshin N, Chander G, Hengst S, Pfeffer R, Chechick A, Hanannel A, Dogadkin O, Catane R. Pain palliation in patients with bone metastases using MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jan;16(1):140-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0011-2. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
PMID: 19002530BACKGROUNDChow E, Hoskin P, Mitera G, Zeng L, Lutz S, Roos D, Hahn C, van der Linden Y, Hartsell W, Kumar E; International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party. Update of the international consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):1730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
PMID: 21489705BACKGROUNDCleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.
PMID: 8080219BACKGROUNDGroenvold M, Petersen MA, Aaronson NK, Arraras JI, Blazeby JM, Bottomley A, Fayers PM, de Graeff A, Hammerlid E, Kaasa S, Sprangers MA, Bjorner JB; EORTC Quality of Life Group. The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: a shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. Eur J Cancer. 2006 Jan;42(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.022. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
PMID: 16162404BACKGROUNDChow E, Hird A, Velikova G, Johnson C, Dewolf L, Bezjak A, Wu J, Shafiq J, Sezer O, Kardamakis D, van der Linden Y, Ma B, Castro M, Arnalot PF, Ahmedzai S, Clemons M, Hoskin P, Yee A, Brundage M, Bottomley A; EORTC Quality of Life Group. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with bone metastases: the EORTC QLQ-BM22. Eur J Cancer. 2009 May;45(7):1146-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.013. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
PMID: 19097882BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maurice A van den Bosch, MD, PhD
UMC Utrecht
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2012
First Posted
April 26, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 4, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04