NCT02698709

Brief Summary

The main purpose of this study is to determine new diagnostic criteria for an eye disease called keratoconus.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
698

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2015

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2015

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 24, 2016

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 4, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 4, 2016

Status Verified

February 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

February 24, 2016

Last Update Submit

February 29, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

KeratoconusCorneal TopographyDiagnosisKeratomileusis, Laser In Situ

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Astigmatism corneal vectors (based on keratometric readings at the three millimeter optical zones for both corneal surfaces).

    Corneal tomography at an Scheimpflug-based tomographer

    Through study completion, an average of 6 months.

Study Arms (3)

Healthy corneas (C)

Corneas of normal candidates to refractive surgery who did not develop any sign of corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis during a two year follow-up period were analyzed by an Scheimpflug-based tomographer. Vector astigmatism analysis of anterior and posterior corneal surfaces were studied in accordance to method proposed by Thibos.

Other: Analysis of anterior and posterior corneal surfaces

Overt keratoconus (Kc)

Whether both eyes manifested classic Kc-suggestive topographic features, such as corneal steepness higher than 47.20 diopters (D), superior-inferior asymmetry higher than 1.40 D and thinnest pachymetric reading lower than 500 micrometers. Such eyes were analyzed by an Scheimpflug-based tomographer. Vector astigmatism analysis of anterior and posterior corneal surfaces were studied in accordance to method proposed by Thibos.

Other: Analysis of anterior and posterior corneal surfaces

Forme fruste keratoconus (FFKc)

Whether only one eye manifested classic Kc-suggestive topographic features, such as corneal steepness higher than 47.20 diopters (D), superior-inferior asymmetry higher than 1.40 D and thinnest pachymetric reading lower than 500 micrometers, and the fellow eye seemed unaffected. Such unaffected eyes were analyzed by an Scheimpflug-based tomographer. Vector astigmatism analysis of anterior and posterior corneal surfaces were studied in accordance to method proposed by Thibos.

Other: Analysis of anterior and posterior corneal surfaces

Interventions

Corneal data obtained from a Scheimpflug-based topographer were converted to astigmatic vectors in accordance to the method proposed by Thibos

Also known as: Thibos' vectorial astigmatism analysis
Forme fruste keratoconus (FFKc)Healthy corneas (C)Overt keratoconus (Kc)

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Two databases of patients were examined at the Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), between July 2004 and October 2013. One of the databases contained information of normal candidates to refractive surgery who did not develop any sign of corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis during a two year follow-up period (C). The second database included information concerning corneas with keratoconus (Kc), categorized as overt Kc, if both eyes manifested classic Kc-suggestive topographic features, such as corneal steepness higher than 47.20 diopters (D), superior-inferior asymmetry higher than 1.40 D and thinnest pachymetric reading lower than 500 micrometers; or forme fruste (FFKc), if only one eye exhibited such features.

You may qualify if:

  • Good-quality Scheimpflug scans (approved by the device in the ''Examination Quality Specification'').

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous eye surgery or trauma, and any sort of corneal scarring that might interfere with keratometric data acquisition.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clínica Oftalmológica do Hospital de Clínicas - FMUSP

São Paulo, São Paulo, 05.403-001, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (30)

  • Li X, Yang H, Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus: classification scheme based on videokeratography and clinical signs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1597-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.050.

  • Goebels S, Eppig T, Wagenpfeil S, Cayless A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A. Staging of keratoconus indices regarding tomography, topography, and biomechanical measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;159(4):733-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 26.

  • Moreira LB, Bardal RA, Crisigiovanni LR. Contact lenses fitting after intracorneal ring segments implantation in keratoconus. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2013 Jul-Aug;76(4):215-7. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492013000400004.

  • Raiskup F, Theuring A, Pillunat LE, Spoerl E. Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in progressive keratoconus: ten-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jan;41(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.09.033.

  • Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, Belin MW, Ambrosio R Jr, Guell JL, Malecaze F, Nishida K, Sangwan VS; Group of Panelists for the Global Delphi Panel of Keratoconus and Ectatic Diseases. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea. 2015 Apr;34(4):359-69. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000408.

  • Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Ozulken K, Ozyol E, Akinci A. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Sep;39(9):1348-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.023. Epub 2013 Jun 29.

  • Smadja D, Santhiago MR, Mello GR, Krueger RR, Colin J, Touboul D. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2013 Apr;29(4):274-81. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130318-07.

  • Torricelli AA, Bechara SJ, Wilson SE. Screening of refractive surgery candidates for LASIK and PRK. Cornea. 2014 Oct;33(10):1051-5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000171.

  • Randleman JB, Akhtar J, Lynn MJ, Ambrosio R Jr, Dupps WJ Jr, Krueger RR, Klyce SD. Comparison of objective and subjective refractive surgery screening parameters between regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Feb;41(2):286-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.026. Epub 2014 Dec 20.

  • Ramos IC, Correa R, Guerra FP, Trattler W, Belin MW, Klyce SD, Fontes BM, Schor P, Smolek MK, Dawson DG, Chalita MR, Cazal JO, Ruiz M, Randleman JB, Ambrosio R Jr. Variability of subjective classifications of corneal topography maps from LASIK candidates. J Refract Surg. 2013 Nov;29(11):770-5. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130823-01. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

  • Qin B, Chen S, Brass R, Li Y, Tang M, Zhang X, Wang X, Wang Q, Huang D. Keratoconus diagnosis with optical coherence tomography-based pachymetric scoring system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Dec;39(12):1864-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.048.

  • Ruisenor Vazquez PR, Galletti JD, Minguez N, Delrivo M, Fuentes Bonthoux F, Pfortner T, Galletti JG. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;158(1):32-40.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.03.018. Epub 2014 Apr 5.

  • Buhren J, Schaffeler T, Kohnen T. Validation of metrics for the detection of subclinical keratoconus in a new patient collective. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Feb;40(2):259-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.044. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

  • Galletti JD, Ruisenor Vazquez PR, Minguez N, Delrivo M, Bonthoux FF, Pfortner T, Galletti JG. Corneal asymmetry analysis by pentacam scheimpflug tomography for keratoconus diagnosis. J Refract Surg. 2015 Feb;31(2):116-23. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150122-07.

  • Ambrosio R Jr, Valbon BF, Faria-Correia F, Ramos I, Luz A. Scheimpflug imaging for laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;24(4):310-20. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283622a94.

  • Montalban R, Pinero DP, Javaloy J, Alio JL. Scheimpflug photography-based clinical characterization of the correlation of the corneal shape between the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces in the normal human eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Nov;38(11):1925-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.06.050. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

  • Montalban R, Pinero DP, Javaloy J, Alio JL. Correlation of the corneal toricity between anterior and posterior corneal surfaces in the normal human eye. Cornea. 2013 Jun;32(6):791-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31827bf898.

  • Koch DD, Ali SF, Weikert MP, Shirayama M, Jenkins R, Wang L. Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Dec;38(12):2080-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.036. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

  • Pinero DP, Alio JL, Tomas J, Maldonado MJ, Teus MA, Barraquer RI. Vector analysis of evolutive corneal astigmatic changes in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 8;52(7):4054-62. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6856.

  • Saad A, Gatinel D. Topographic and tomographic properties of forme fruste keratoconus corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Nov;51(11):5546-55. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5369. Epub 2010 Jun 16.

  • Thibos LN, Horner D. Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Jan;27(1):80-5. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00797-5.

  • Read SA, Collins MJ. Diurnal variation of corneal shape and thickness. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Mar;86(3):170-80. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181981b7e.

  • Eom Y, Rhim JW, Kang SY, Kim SW, Song JS, Kim HM. Toric Intraocular Lens Calculations Using Ratio of Anterior to Posterior Corneal Cylinder Power. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct;160(4):717-24.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

  • Alpins N, Ong JK, Stamatelatos G. Corneal topographic astigmatism (CorT) to quantify total corneal astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;31(3):182-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150224-02.

  • Gilani F, Cortese M, Ambrosio RR Jr, Lopes B, Ramos I, Harvey EM, Belin MW. Comprehensive anterior segment normal values generated by rotating Scheimpflug tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Nov;39(11):1707-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

  • Lopes B, Ramos I, Ambrosio R Jr. Corneal densitometry in keratoconus. Cornea. 2014 Dec;33(12):1282-6. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000266.

  • Baratloo A, Hosseini M, Negida A, El Ashal G. Part 1: Simple Definition and Calculation of Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity. Emerg (Tehran). 2015 Spring;3(2):48-9. No abstract available.

  • Saunders LJ, Zhu H, Bunce C, Dore CJ, Freemantle N, Crabb DP; Ophthalmic Statistics Group. Ophthalmic statistics note 5: diagnostic tests-sensitivity and specificity. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;99(9):1168-70. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306055. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

  • McGee S. Simplifying likelihood ratios. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Aug;17(8):646-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10750.x.

  • Shi R, Conrad SA. Correlation and regression analysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009 Oct;103(4 Suppl 1):S35-41. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)60820-4. No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

KeratoconusDisease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Corneal DiseasesEye DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Milton R Alves, MD, PhD

    Clínica Oftalmológica HCFM/USP

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2016

First Posted

March 4, 2016

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion

August 1, 2015

Study Completion

September 1, 2015

Last Updated

March 4, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations