Titrated Quantitative Conjunctival Provocation Test (tqCPT)
tqCPT
1 other identifier
interventional
23
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The clinical relevance of an allergen-specific sensitization is proven e.g., by allergen challenge tests in clinical routine. Several protocols for different challenge tests such as nasal (NPT), bronchial (BPT) or conjunctival provocation test (CPT) have been proposed. Beneath others, the CPT is broadly used in both clinical trials and routine because of its feasibility. However, there is no internationally harmonized standard regarding the clinical interpretation of CPT results as well as a lack of validation of a specific outcome score. Therefore, this trial aims to investigate and validate a new scoring system for CPT results in order to provide this test as a useful method in future clinical trials.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2016
CompletedFebruary 24, 2016
February 1, 2016
3 months
February 9, 2016
February 23, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
total conjunctival symptoms provoked by conjunctival provocation test (CPT) at two consecutive settings
Total Conjunctival symptoms (itching (0-3), irritation (0-3), tearing (0-3), redness (0-3)) provoked by a conjunctival provocation test (CPT) were evaluated and categorized on a 4 point Likert-Scale (Total Score = 0-12 points)) at a first setting and then again after a rechallenge after an interval of 3-4 weeks. Changes of Total score values (0-12 points) of both settings were calculated using the the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients.
baseline and re-challenge after 3-4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Conjunctival redness score (0-3) provoked by conjunctival provocation test (CPT) at two consecutive settings.
baseline and re-challenge after 3-4 weeks
difference in the degree of conjunctival redness provoked by conjunctival provocation test (CPT) at two consecutive settings as assessed by digital photo analysis
baseline and re-challenge after 3-4 weeks
Correlation of the degree of conjunctival redness as assessed by digital photo analysis with the conjunctival redness score evaluated and categorized on a 4 point Likert-Scale (0-3) provoked by a conjunctival provocation test (CPT).
baseline and re-challenge after 3-4 weeks
Study Arms (1)
open label
EXPERIMENTALtest/retest of a titrated quantitative CPT (TqCPT) with outcomes: CPT-scoring system and correlation with digital photo analysis. in all patients: 1 Arm = CPT test/re-test, no comparator No intervention of a new drug (CPT-solution registered (ALK- Abelló, Hørsholm, Denmark));
Interventions
see information in "arm/group descriptions"
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- moderate to severe allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) symptoms in preceding two years -intake of anti-allergic medication in the preceding two years -positive test result in skin prick test (SPT) (wheal size at least 3 mm larger than the negative control). -
- retrospective global symptoms score (≥5 out of 12)
You may not qualify if:
- acute diseases of the eye or of the nose/nasal sinuses,
- persistent allergy
- intake of concomitant (antiallergic) medication prior to CPT-challenges
- CPT score ≥3 during the examination of the control (non-challenged eye) at baseline
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Pfaar O, Classen DP, Astvatsatourov A, Klimek L, Mosges R. Reliability of a New Symptom Score in a Titrated Quantitative Conjunctival Provocation Test Supported by an Objective Photodocumentation. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2018;176(3-4):215-224. doi: 10.1159/000487884. Epub 2018 May 16.
PMID: 29768274DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oliver Pfaar, Prof.Dr.
Allergy Center Wiesbaden, Germany
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ludger Klimek, Prof. Dr.
Allergy Center Wiesbaden, Germany
- STUDY CHAIR
Dan Philipp Claßen
Allergy Center Wiesbaden, Germany
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2016
First Posted
February 24, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
February 24, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share