Central Venous Catheterization Techniques in Neonates
Randomized Controlled Trial on Central Venous Catheterization Techniques in Neonates: Seldinger Versus Modified Seldinger
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in central venous catheter insertion time, success rate, and complication between the Seldinger and modified Seldinger technique for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in neonates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2017
CompletedJanuary 9, 2018
January 1, 2018
1.4 years
February 17, 2016
January 7, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
First successful central venous catheterization rate
Interval between skin penetration of the needle or angiocatheter and installation of the indwelling catheter, an expected average of 3 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Time to first puncture of central vein
Interval between skin penetration of the needle or angiocatheter and flashback of blood, an expected average of 30 seconds
Time to guide wire insertion
Interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or angiocatheter after guide wire insertion, an expected average of 90 seconds
Total time to central venous catheterization
Interval between skin penetration of the needle or angiocatheter and installation of the indwelling catheter, an expected average of 3 minutes
Number of central vein puncture trial
up to 5 times, an expected average observation time of 30 seconds
Number of guide wire insertion trial
up to 5 times, an expected average observation time of 90 seconds
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Seldinger
EXPERIMENTALUse a 23 gauge introducer needle for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization
Modified Seldinger
EXPERIMENTALUse a 22 gauge Angiocath Plus catheter for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in internal jugular vein
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- surgery under general anesthesia
- require central venous catheterization
You may not qualify if:
- central vein anomaly
- hematoma in central vein
- catheterization site infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
Related Publications (3)
Grebenik CR, Boyce A, Sinclair ME, Evans RD, Mason DG, Martin B. NICE guidelines for central venous catheterization in children. Is the evidence base sufficient? Br J Anaesth. 2004 Jun;92(6):827-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh134. Epub 2004 Apr 30.
PMID: 15121722BACKGROUNDSong IK, Lee JH, Kang JE, Oh HW, Kim HS, Park HP, Kim JT. Comparison of central venous catheterization techniques in pediatric patients: needle vs angiocath. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Nov;25(11):1120-6. doi: 10.1111/pan.12726. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
PMID: 26248059BACKGROUNDSong IK, Kim EH, Lee JH, Jang YE, Kim HS, Kim JT. Seldinger vs modified Seldinger techniques for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterisation in neonates: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Dec;121(6):1332-1337. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
PMID: 30442261DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jin-Tae Kim
Seoul National University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2016
First Posted
February 23, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 1, 2017
Study Completion
September 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01