Evaluation of a Revised Indication for Determining Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Sponsor values the progression of hearing healthcare practice and acknowledges a need for re-evaluation of indications for determining adult cochlear implant candidacy. This need arises from current research, peer reviewed literature, and technological advancement with concomitant performance outcomes. To address this specifically, the Sponsor proposes to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Cochlear™ Nucleus® implant system with a revised indication.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 25, 2014
CompletedOctober 27, 2016
September 1, 2016
1.7 years
April 14, 2011
September 18, 2014
September 23, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
CNC Monosyllabic Word Score - Treated Ear
The primary study endpoint was to test whether a statistically significant difference could be obtained between the mean, preoperative Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) monosyllabic word score in the ear to be implanted compared to the postoperative CNC word score in the cochlear implant alone condition at 6 months postimplant activation for candidates who currently perform outside the approved Nucleus® cochlear implant candidacy requirements. CNC Word Test is a validated test of open-set word recognition. The test consists of 10 lists with 50 monosyllabic words in each list. Subject responses are scored for both words and phonemes correct in the correct sequence. Subjects will be tested using a configuration of speech at 0º azimuth in quiet.
Six months
Study Arms (1)
cochlear implant
OTHERInterventions
Cochlear implant surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eighteen years of age or older at the time of the study.
- Preoperative aided CNC word score in quiet of greater than or equal to 10% and less than or equal to ¬¬40% in the ear to be implanted; equal to but no better than 50% in the contralateral ear
- Bilateral moderate to profound hearing loss in the low frequencies (up to 1000 Hz) and profound sensorineural hearing loss in the high speech frequencies (3000 Hz and above)
- Willingness to use bimodal stimulation (i.e. a cochlear implant on one ear and a hearing aid on the contralateral ear) through at least 6-months postactivation.
- English spoken as the primary language.
You may not qualify if:
- Congenital hearing loss (for the purpose of this study, onset prior to 2 years-of-age).
- Preoperative aided HINT sentence score less than or equal to 50% in the ear to be implanted
- Ossification, absence of cochlear development or any other cochlear anomaly that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array.
- Hearing loss of neural or central origin (e.g., deafness due to lesions on the acoustic nerve or central auditory pathway).
- Active middle-ear infection.
- Unwillingness and/or inability of the candidate to comply with all investigational requirements including, but not limited to, study protocol and surgical procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cochlearlead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Colin Driscoll
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Colin Driscoll, MD
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2011
First Posted
April 18, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 27, 2016
Results First Posted
September 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2016-09