Individualized Cefepime Dosing Study
INCED
Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Cefepime Administrered Intravenously in Intensive Care Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Several population pharmacokinetic (PK) models for cefepime in critically ill patients have been described, all indicating that variability in renal clearance is the main determinant of observed variability in exposure. The main objective of this study was hence to determine which renal marker best predicts cefepime clearance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2016
CompletedFebruary 12, 2016
February 1, 2016
1.3 years
February 6, 2016
February 11, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Median absolute predictive error (MdAPE) of population PK model without covariates
Evaluation during a maximum follow-up period of 5 days
Median absolute predictive error (MdAPE) of population PK model with different renal markers incorporated
Evaluation during a maximum follow-up period of 5 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The estimated probability of target attianment (%) for the different categories of the Sanford guide
Based on data from a maximum follow-up period of 5 days
The estimated probability of toxic levels (%) for the different categories of the Sanford guide
Based on data from a maximum follow-up period of 5 days
Study Arms (1)
Study arm
EXPERIMENTAL* Cefepime dosing * Blood sampling * Urine sampling * Determination of renal markers * Population pharmacokinetic modeling * Covariate screening * Monte Carlo simulations
Interventions
Patients will received cefepime administered per standard-of-care as a 30 min intravenous infusion. Dosing will be based on local guidelines (the Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy 2012-2013) using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine formula to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
Blood will be sampled immediately prior to dose administration (time = 0 at the start of the 30 min infusion), at 0.5, 1, 3, 5 hours post-start of infusion and just before the subsequent dose. From day two onwards, samples will be taken at the end of the infusion and just before the next dose. For the quantification of cefepime, a validated solid phase extraction-liquid chromatography electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry method will be used.
Timed urine collections were taken during one dosing interval (8 hours in a three times daily regimen) every day.
Creatinine (modified Jaffe method) and urea in serum will be determined using an Architect c16000 analyzer (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA). Cystatin C will be determined using a particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay (N Latex Cystatin C, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany) by use of a BN II nephelometer (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics). This assay has a calibration traceable to the first certified reference material for cystatin C in human serum (ERM-DA471/IFCC). Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) in urine and uromodulin in serum will be determined using commercially available ELISA assays: Quantikine ELISA Human TIM-1/KIM-1/HAVCR (R\&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and Uromodulin ELISA (Euroimmun, Luebeck, Germany), respectively.
The cefepime concentration versus time data will be fitted using the FOCE-I estimation algorithm in NONMEM® (Version 7.3; GloboMax LLC, Hanover, MD, USA). R® (R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria) will be used to graphically assess the model's goodness-of-fit and to evaluate the model's predictive capabilities. As a measure of prediction error, the absolute prediction error (APE) will be used. In short, the measured cefepime concentrations for each individual i at time point j were compared against the population predicted cefepime concentrations, i.e. the predictions for each individual without taking into account the between-subject variability (PRED in NONMEM). The distribution of APEs will be summarized by the median and 90% percentile.
Renal function will be assessed by four serum based kidney markers (serum creatinine, cystatin C, urea and uromodulin) and two urinary markers (measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) and KIM-1, both on timed urine collections). Serum creatinine and cystatin C will also be used to calculate the eGFR based on CKD-EPI formulas.
Based on the final covariate model, a Monte Carlo-based simulation study will be performed to evaluate the Sanford dose recommendations for ICU patients.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient age 18 years or more
- Hospitalized in the ICU of OLV hospital Aalst
- Elected by the treating physician to receive cefepime,irrespectively of the study
- Presence of arterial or central line for blood sampling
You may not qualify if:
- Exact time of cefepime administration or blood sampling unknown
- No written informed consent by the patient or his/her (legal) representative
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospitallead
- University Ghentcollaborator
Related Publications (24)
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb SA, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
PMID: 23353941BACKGROUNDRoberts JA, Lipman J. Pharmacokinetic issues for antibiotics in the critically ill patient. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):840-51; quiz 859. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181961bff.
PMID: 19237886BACKGROUNDGoncalves-Pereira J, Povoa P. Antibiotics in critically ill patients: a systematic review of the pharmacokinetics of beta-lactams. Crit Care. 2011;15(5):R206. doi: 10.1186/cc10441. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
PMID: 21914174BACKGROUNDSime FB, Roberts MS, Peake SL, Lipman J, Roberts JA. Does Beta-lactam Pharmacokinetic Variability in Critically Ill Patients Justify Therapeutic Drug Monitoring? A Systematic Review. Ann Intensive Care. 2012 Jul 28;2(1):35. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-35.
PMID: 22839761BACKGROUNDLi C, Du X, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Clinical pharmacodynamics of meropenem in patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 May;51(5):1725-30. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00294-06. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
PMID: 17307978BACKGROUNDMcKinnon PS, Paladino JA, Schentag JJ. Evaluation of area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC) and time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) as predictors of outcome for cefepime and ceftazidime in serious bacterial infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008 Apr;31(4):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.12.009. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
PMID: 18313273BACKGROUNDRoberts JA, Paul SK, Akova M, Bassetti M, De Waele JJ, Dimopoulos G, Kaukonen KM, Koulenti D, Martin C, Montravers P, Rello J, Rhodes A, Starr T, Wallis SC, Lipman J; DALI Study. DALI: defining antibiotic levels in intensive care unit patients: are current beta-lactam antibiotic doses sufficient for critically ill patients? Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;58(8):1072-83. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu027. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
PMID: 24429437BACKGROUNDRoberts JA, Kruger P, Paterson DL, Lipman J. Antibiotic resistance--what's dosing got to do with it? Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):2433-40. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318180fe62.
PMID: 18596628BACKGROUNDFantin B, Farinotti R, Thabaut A, Carbon C. Conditions for the emergence of resistance to cefpirome and ceftazidime in experimental endocarditis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Mar;33(3):563-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.3.563.
PMID: 8040120BACKGROUNDGugel J, Dos Santos Pereira A, Pignatari AC, Gales AC. beta-Lactam MICs correlate poorly with mutant prevention concentrations for clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Jun;50(6):2276-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00144-06. No abstract available.
PMID: 16723607BACKGROUNDFugate JE, Kalimullah EA, Hocker SE, Clark SL, Wijdicks EF, Rabinstein AA. Cefepime neurotoxicity in the intensive care unit: a cause of severe, underappreciated encephalopathy. Crit Care. 2013 Nov 7;17(6):R264. doi: 10.1186/cc13094.
PMID: 24200036BACKGROUNDBeumier M, Casu GS, Hites M, Wolff F, Cotton F, Vincent JL, Jacobs F, Taccone FS. Elevated beta-lactam concentrations associated with neurological deterioration in ICU septic patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 May;81(5):497-506. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
PMID: 25220556BACKGROUNDMani LY, Kissling S, Viceic D, Vogt B, Burnier M, Buclin T, Renard D. Intermittent hemodialysis treatment in cefepime-induced neurotoxicity: case report, pharmacokinetic modeling, and review of the literature. Hemodial Int. 2015 Apr;19(2):333-43. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12198. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
PMID: 25052578BACKGROUNDKim A, Kim JE, Paek YM, Hong KS, Cho YJ, Cho JY, Park HK, Koo HK, Song P. Cefepime- Induced Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus (NCSE). J Epilepsy Res. 2013 Jun 30;3(1):39-41. doi: 10.14581/jer.13008. eCollection 2013 Jun.
PMID: 24649471BACKGROUNDDurand-Maugard C, Lemaire-Hurtel AS, Gras-Champel V, Hary L, Maizel J, Prud'homme-Bernardy A, Andrejak C, Andrejak M. Blood and CSF monitoring of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity: nine case reports. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 May;67(5):1297-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks012. Epub 2012 Jan 31. No abstract available.
PMID: 22298349BACKGROUNDGangireddy VG, Mitchell LC, Coleman T. Cefepime neurotoxicity despite renal adjusted dosing. Scand J Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;43(10):827-9. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2011.581308. Epub 2011 May 23.
PMID: 21604923BACKGROUNDTanaka A, Takechi K, Watanabe S, Tanaka M, Suemaru K, Araki H. Comparison of the prevalence of convulsions associated with the use of cefepime and meropenem. Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Oct;35(5):683-7. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9799-3. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
PMID: 23733559BACKGROUNDLipman J, Wallis SC, Boots RJ. Cefepime versus cefpirome: the importance of creatinine clearance. Anesth Analg. 2003 Oct;97(4):1149-1154. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000077077.54084.B0.
PMID: 14500173BACKGROUNDTam VH, McKinnon PS, Akins RL, Drusano GL, Rybak MJ. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients with various degrees of renal function. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Jun;47(6):1853-61. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.6.1853-1861.2003.
PMID: 12760858BACKGROUNDRoos JF, Bulitta J, Lipman J, Kirkpatrick CM. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic rationale for cefepime dosing regimens in intensive care units. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Nov;58(5):987-93. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl349. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
PMID: 16943209BACKGROUNDGeorges B, Conil JM, Seguin T, Dieye E, Cougot P, Decun JF, Lavit M, Samii K, Houin G, Saivin S. Cefepime in intensive care unit patients: validation of a population pharmacokinetic approach and influence of covariables. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Apr;46(4):157-64. doi: 10.5414/cpp46157.
PMID: 18397688BACKGROUNDDelattre IK, Musuamba FT, Jacqmin P, Taccone FS, Laterre PF, Verbeeck RK, Jacobs F, Wallemacq P. Population pharmacokinetics of four beta-lactams in critically ill septic patients comedicated with amikacin. Clin Biochem. 2012 Jul;45(10-11):780-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.03.030. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
PMID: 22503878BACKGROUNDNicasio AM, Ariano RE, Zelenitsky SA, Kim A, Crandon JL, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose, prolonged-infusion cefepime in adult critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Apr;53(4):1476-81. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01141-08. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
PMID: 19188394BACKGROUNDLima-Rogel V, Medina-Rojas EL, Del Carmen Milan-Segovia R, Noyola DE, Nieto-Aguirre K, Lopez-Delarosa A, Romano-Moreno S. Population pharmacokinetics of cefepime in neonates with severe nosocomial infections. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Jun;33(3):295-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00913.x.
PMID: 18452417BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stijn Jonckheere
Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2016
First Posted
February 11, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 12, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share