The Effects of a Systematic Pain Assessment Approach on Critically Ill Patients Outcomes in ICU
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a systematic approach to pain assessment in the critically ill patients' outcome The investigators hypothesize that, patients who will undergo systematic pain assessment and they will have their results notified to physicians and nurses, will demonstrate favorable effects on pain intensity, more efficient use of sedatives and analgesics, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, mortality, adverse events and complications, in relation to patients who will receive standard care alone. Moreover it is expected that they will demonstrate altered levels of plasma neuropeptides and biochemical markers in peripheral blood.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain
Started Mar 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedMay 6, 2015
May 1, 2015
8 months
April 22, 2015
May 2, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
a) Level of pain (intensity, incidence of high levels of pain with a numerical pain scale NRS> 6, Behavioral pain scale (BPS) > 5 and Critical pain observation Tool (C-POT) >2
morning between 9:00-11: hrs, and afternoon between 4:00-6:00 hrs) for ten continuous days
To investigate the effect of the systematic assessment of pain among patients groups - control and intervention as to:The total dose, frequency of administration and the type of analgesics and sedatives received
every 24 hrs for ten continuous days
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Effect of the systematic evaluation of pain among patients groups - control and intervention as to:The degree of sedation/agitation
morning between 9:00-11: hrs, and afternoon between 4:00-6:00 hrs) for ten continuous days
Effect of the systematic evaluation of pain among patients groups - control and intervention as to:The levels of biochemical marker, cortisol, in the serum
morning 1st day intervention (one sample), 3rd day intervention (second sample), 5th day intervention (third sample)
Effect of the systematic evaluation of pain among patients groups - control and intervention as to:The levels of biochemical marker corticotrophin hormone -ACTH in the serum
morning 1st day intervention (one sample), 3rd day intervention (second sample), 5th day intervention (third sample)
Effect of the systematic evaluation of pain among patients groups - control and intervention as to: The levels of biochemical marker, b-endorphin in the serum
morning 1st day intervention (one sample), 3rd day intervention (second sample), 5th day intervention (third sample)
Effect of the systematic evaluation of pain among patients groups - control and intervention as to: The levels of neuropeptide Y
morning 1st day intervention (one sample), 3rd day intervention (second sample), 5th day intervention (third sample)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALIntervention: 1. systematic pain assessment 2. Notification of results of assessments to nurses and physicians. Pain Assessments will be done with the use of 2 different behavioral pain tools by independent assessors and the results of the assessments will be notified to the nurses and physicians and their respond will be observed and documented
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention. Systematic pain assessments. Assessments of pain will be done by independent assessors but results will not be notified to nurses or physicians
Interventions
Systematic assessment of pain twice daily with the use of 2 different behavioral pain tools (Behavioral Pain Scale - BPS, and Critical Care Pain Observation Tool - C-POT) for non-communicative patients and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 1-10 for communicative patients.
Pain assessments will be carried out by independent investigators who will notify the results to ICU nurses and physicians and observe and document their reaction
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years and older
- All patients with an estimated source of pain or due to immunological process as trauma, surgery, or due to general factors such as endotracheal intubation, interventional catheters
You may not qualify if:
- Length of stay in the ICU \<24 hours
- The patient receives neuromuscular blockers,
- The patient has a disease or condition, such as Guillain-Barre, peripheral neuropathy, which modifies sensory transmission of painful stimuli
- The patient has a disease or condition which complicates the assessment of pain behavior, such as decerebration or vegetative state, agitation\> 3 in the Richmond Agitation sedation Scale (RASS)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cyprus University of Technologylead
- Nicosia General Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Nicosia General Hospital
Nicosia, Cyprus
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Evanthia G Georgiou, PhD Cand
Cyprus University of Technology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2015
First Posted
May 6, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 6, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05