NCT02435589

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a systematic approach to pain assessment in the critically ill patients' outcome The investigators hypothesize that, patients who will undergo systematic pain assessment and they will have their results notified to physicians and nurses, will demonstrate favorable effects on pain intensity, more efficient use of sedatives and analgesics, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, mortality, adverse events and complications, in relation to patients who will receive standard care alone. Moreover it is expected that they will demonstrate altered levels of plasma neuropeptides and biochemical markers in peripheral blood.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2015

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 6, 2015

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2015

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2015

Status Verified

May 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

April 22, 2015

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • a) Level of pain (intensity, incidence of high levels of pain with a numerical pain scale NRS> 6, Behavioral pain scale (BPS) > 5 and Critical pain observation Tool (C-POT) >2

    morning between 9:00-11: hrs, and afternoon between 4:00-6:00 hrs) for ten continuous days

  • To investigate the effect of the systematic assessment of pain among patients groups - control and intervention as to:The total dose, frequency of administration and the type of analgesics and sedatives received

    every 24 hrs for ten continuous days

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Effect of the systematic evaluation of pain among patients groups - control and intervention as to:The degree of sedation/agitation

    morning between 9:00-11: hrs, and afternoon between 4:00-6:00 hrs) for ten continuous days

  • Effect of the systematic evaluation of pain among patients groups - control and intervention as to:The levels of biochemical marker, cortisol, in the serum

    morning 1st day intervention (one sample), 3rd day intervention (second sample), 5th day intervention (third sample)

  • Effect of the systematic evaluation of pain among patients groups - control and intervention as to:The levels of biochemical marker corticotrophin hormone -ACTH in the serum

    morning 1st day intervention (one sample), 3rd day intervention (second sample), 5th day intervention (third sample)

  • Effect of the systematic evaluation of pain among patients groups - control and intervention as to: The levels of biochemical marker, b-endorphin in the serum

    morning 1st day intervention (one sample), 3rd day intervention (second sample), 5th day intervention (third sample)

  • Effect of the systematic evaluation of pain among patients groups - control and intervention as to: The levels of neuropeptide Y

    morning 1st day intervention (one sample), 3rd day intervention (second sample), 5th day intervention (third sample)

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention: 1. systematic pain assessment 2. Notification of results of assessments to nurses and physicians. Pain Assessments will be done with the use of 2 different behavioral pain tools by independent assessors and the results of the assessments will be notified to the nurses and physicians and their respond will be observed and documented

Other: Systematic pain assessmentOther: Notification of results of assessments

Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intervention. Systematic pain assessments. Assessments of pain will be done by independent assessors but results will not be notified to nurses or physicians

Other: Systematic pain assessment

Interventions

Systematic assessment of pain twice daily with the use of 2 different behavioral pain tools (Behavioral Pain Scale - BPS, and Critical Care Pain Observation Tool - C-POT) for non-communicative patients and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 1-10 for communicative patients.

Control GroupIntervention group

Pain assessments will be carried out by independent investigators who will notify the results to ICU nurses and physicians and observe and document their reaction

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years and older
  • All patients with an estimated source of pain or due to immunological process as trauma, surgery, or due to general factors such as endotracheal intubation, interventional catheters

You may not qualify if:

  • Length of stay in the ICU \<24 hours
  • The patient receives neuromuscular blockers,
  • The patient has a disease or condition, such as Guillain-Barre, peripheral neuropathy, which modifies sensory transmission of painful stimuli
  • The patient has a disease or condition which complicates the assessment of pain behavior, such as decerebration or vegetative state, agitation\> 3 in the Richmond Agitation sedation Scale (RASS)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nicosia General Hospital

Nicosia, Cyprus

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Evanthia G Georgiou, PhD Cand

    Cyprus University of Technology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Evanthia G Georgiou, PhD Cand

CONTACT

Elizabeth DE Papathanassoglou, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2015

First Posted

May 6, 2015

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion

November 1, 2015

Study Completion

May 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 6, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-05

Locations