Prognostication of Need for Rehabilitation and Special Support in ICU Survivors
PROGRESS-ICU
1 other identifier
observational
573
3 countries
10
Brief Summary
Title: PROGnostication of need for REhabilitation and Special Support after Intensive Care Unit Stay - a multinational, observational study Objectives:
- 1.To investigate associations between potential risk factors (premorbid factors, in-ICU treatments/diagnoses and patient status at ICU discharge) and three-month physical and psychological outcome in ICU survivors.
- 2.Based on the associations between identified risk factors and adverse outcomes, create and validate instruments, to be used at ICU discharge, predicting new-onset physical or psychological problems three months after ICU discharge.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2016
Shorter than P25 for all trials
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedFebruary 13, 2018
February 1, 2018
10 months
January 28, 2016
February 12, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Adverse psychological outcome
Caseness defined as PTSS-14 part B score above 45 or HADS subscale score above 10
Three months post-ICU
Adverse physical outcome
Caseness defined as Reduction in Barthel Index (0-100) by 10 points or more
Three months post-ICU
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Health-related quality of life assessed with Short Form -36 in patients
In first three months post-ICU
Eligibility Criteria
Adult ICU patients
You may qualify if:
- ICU stay\>24 hours for postoperative patients and \>12 hours for other ICU admissions
You may not qualify if:
- Previously documented cognitive impairment (e.g. dementia or intellectual development disorder resulting in poor understanding/compliance in outcome assessment)
- No home address
- Unable to read and write in language spoken at local study site (Swedish/Danish/Dutch)/used in questionnaires
- Patient declines participation
- Moribund patient or with more than one limitation of therapy
- Need for neurointensive care due to head trauma, intracranial hemorrhage or infarction AND GCS never better than 13 in the first 48 hours
- Transfer to other ICU before discharge to ward
- Solely in ICU for elective procedure (eg central line, epidural)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Karolinska University Hospitallead
- Region Stockholmcollaborator
Study Sites (10)
Rigshospitalet Copenhagen
Copenhagen, Denmark
Odense University Hospital
Odense, Denmark
University Medical Centre Radboud
Nijmegen, Netherlands
University Medical Centre Utrecht
Utrecht, Netherlands
Östersund Hospital
Östersund, Jämtland County, Sweden
Umeå University Hospital
Umeå, Västerbotten County, Sweden
Örebro University Hospital
Örebro, Sweden
Dept of Anesthesiology, Surgical Services and Intensive Care Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
Stockholm South Hospital
Stockholm, Sweden
Dept of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Uppsala Akademiska
Uppsala, Sweden
Related Publications (11)
Rhodes A, Ferdinande P, Flaatten H, Guidet B, Metnitz PG, Moreno RP. The variability of critical care bed numbers in Europe. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Oct;38(10):1647-53. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
PMID: 22777516BACKGROUNDNeedham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins RO, Weinert C, Wunsch H, Zawistowski C, Bemis-Dougherty A, Berney SC, Bienvenu OJ, Brady SL, Brodsky MB, Denehy L, Elliott D, Flatley C, Harabin AL, Jones C, Louis D, Meltzer W, Muldoon SR, Palmer JB, Perme C, Robinson M, Schmidt DM, Scruth E, Spill GR, Storey CP, Render M, Votto J, Harvey MA. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):502-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75.
PMID: 21946660BACKGROUNDDesai SV, Law TJ, Needham DM. Long-term complications of critical care. Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):371-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fd66e5.
PMID: 20959786BACKGROUNDModrykamien AM. The ICU follow-up clinic: a new paradigm for intensivists. Respir Care. 2012 May;57(5):764-72. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01461. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
PMID: 22152275BACKGROUNDCuthbertson BH, Rattray J, Campbell MK, Gager M, Roughton S, Smith A, Hull A, Breeman S, Norrie J, Jenkinson D, Hernandez R, Johnston M, Wilson E, Waldmann C; PRaCTICaL study group. The PRaCTICaL study of nurse led, intensive care follow-up programmes for improving long term outcomes from critical illness: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009 Oct 16;339:b3723. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3723.
PMID: 19837741BACKGROUNDJones C, Skirrow P, Griffiths RD, Humphris GH, Ingleby S, Eddleston J, Waldmann C, Gager M. Rehabilitation after critical illness: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2003 Oct;31(10):2456-61. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000089938.56725.33.
PMID: 14530751BACKGROUNDSchandl A, Bottai M, Hellgren E, Sundin O, Sackey P. Gender differences in psychological morbidity and treatment in intensive care survivors--a cohort study. Crit Care. 2012 May 14;16(3):R80. doi: 10.1186/cc11338.
PMID: 22578016BACKGROUNDSchandl A, Bottai M, Hellgren E, Sundin O, Sackey PV. Developing an early screening instrument for predicting psychological morbidity after critical illness. Crit Care. 2013 Sep 24;17(5):R210. doi: 10.1186/cc13018.
PMID: 24063256BACKGROUNDSchandl A, Bottai M, Holdar U, Hellgren E, Sackey P. Early prediction of new-onset physical disability after intensive care unit stay: a preliminary instrument. Crit Care. 2014 Jul 31;18(4):455. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0455-7.
PMID: 25079385BACKGROUNDSackett DL. Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: 2. Failure to employ physiological statistics, or the only formula a clinician-trialist is ever likely to need (or understand!). CMAJ. 2001 Oct 30;165(9):1226-37. No abstract available.
PMID: 11706914BACKGROUNDMilton A, Schandl A, Soliman IW, Meijers K, van den Boogaard M, Larsson IM, Brorsson C, Ostberg U, Oxenboll-Collet M, Savilampi J, Paskins S, Bottai M, Sackey PV. Development of an ICU discharge instrument predicting psychological morbidity: a multinational study. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Dec;44(12):2038-2047. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5467-3. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
PMID: 30467678DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Peter V Sackey, MD, PhD
Karolinska University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna Milton, MD
Karolinska University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2016
First Posted
February 10, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share