Autologous Fat Grafting Techniques in Patients Undergoing Reconstructive Surgery
A Randomized, Prospective Comparison of Time Associated With Techniques to Process Autologous Fat Grafts
3 other identifiers
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial studies and compares 3 techniques in performing autologous fat grafting (AFG) in patients undergoing surgery to reshape or rebuild (reconstruct) a part of the body changed by previous surgery and inserted into another part of the body. AFG, also called fat injections or fat transplant, is a procedure in which an individual's own body fat (usually from abdomen or legs) is used during reconstructive surgery. Doctors want to compare 3 techniques for processing the fat tissue collected during surgery and the length of time needed to complete each AFG technique and surgery. Comparing 3 AFG techniques and the time to complete them during surgery may help doctors determine the best technique to perform fat grafting in the future.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Feb 2016
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 3, 2020
CompletedJuly 14, 2020
July 1, 2020
4.4 years
February 4, 2016
July 11, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of fat processed defined as the volume of fat harvested per minute
Study data will be collected and managed using the Research Electronic Data Capture. This study will measure and compare the rate of fat processed, defined as the volume of fat processed per unit time associated with the use of three adipose tissue processing techniques.
1 day
Study Arms (3)
Arm I (RESOLVE TM)
Patients undergo AFG reconstructive surgery comprising washing and low velocity spinning using a commercially available system that washes the lipoaspirate with lactated Ringer's solution separates non-fat material from the fat with gentle centrifugal force and suction.
Arm II (Cytori PureGraft TM)
Patients undergo AFG reconstructive surgery comprising gravity filtration using a commercially available system in which the lipoaspirate is rinsed with lactated RL and the non-fat material is filtered through mesh.
Arm III (Coleman technique)
Patients undergo AFG reconstructive surgery comprising standard centrifugation at 3200 rpm for 3 minutes with the resulting oil and aqueous layers discarded.
Interventions
Undergo AFG using the RESOLVE TM technique
Undergo reconstructive surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with available harvest sites for fat grafting
- Patients with body mass index (BMI) \> 20
- Estimated harvested fat volume \>= 100 cc
- Patients are willing and able to give consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with active cancer, including primary cancer, recurrent cancer, or locally or distant metastasis
- Patients who are unable to provide consent
- Patients who are suspected or known to be pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centerlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (1)
Hanson SE, Garvey PB, Chang EI, Reece GP, Liu J, Baumann DP, Butler CE. A Randomized Prospective Time and Motion Comparison of Techniques to Process Autologous Fat Grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;147(5):1035-1044. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007827.
PMID: 33890883DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Summer Hanson
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2016
First Posted
February 9, 2016
Study Start
February 4, 2016
Primary Completion
July 3, 2020
Study Completion
July 3, 2020
Last Updated
July 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07