GAS-Hem Feasibility Study
A New Patient-centric Outcome Measure for Patients With Hemophilia: Testing the Feasibility of GAS-Hem in Pediatric, Adolescent and Adult Hemophilia A Patients
1 other identifier
observational
44
2 countries
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) as a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure to monitor clinical progress in participant-identified goal areas in individuals with hemophilia A.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Aug 2016
Shorter than P25 for all trials
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 5, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 2, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 2, 2016
CompletedMarch 17, 2021
March 1, 2021
3 months
November 24, 2015
March 15, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline of the response to the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) outcomes tool
The GAS-Hem is an online instrument for setting and tracking personalized goals related to hemophilia. The GAS-Hem uses a 5-point scale to record the degree of attainment in relation to individually defined goal areas between an established baseline (scaled as -1) and follow-up time points (here, 6 weeks and 12 weeks). The scale range is +2 (much better outcome) to -2 (much worse outcome), where 0 represents the desired outcome. The process includes a facilitator to ensure that the outcome descriptions for the scale levels are reasonably attainable (not too hard or too easy) and represent roughly equivalent change between levels (ie scores). The overall scoring formula results in a summary score of 50 when all goals are attained (individual goal attainment = 0). Scores \>50 indicate generally better than expected outcomes in goal attainment. Scores \<50 indicate that, overall, goals were not achieved. The overall total scores range is dependent on the average number of goals.
Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
Change from baseline of the measurement of the responsiveness (sensitivity to change) of GAS-Hem compared with the SF-36
Comparison of outcomes on the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) with the Medical Health Outcomes Study Health Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) measures. The analysis will compare effect sizes calculated for the GAS-Hem and the SF-36 using Cohen's d and standardized response means.
Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
Change from baseline of the measurement of the responsiveness (sensitivity to change) of GAS-Hem compared with the PedQL
Comparison of outcomes on the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) measures. The analysis will compare effect sizes calculated for the GAS-Hem and the PedsQL using Cohen's d and standardized response means.
Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change from baseline of Quality of life (QoL) outcomes: Medical Health Outcomes Study Health Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36)
Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
Change from baseline of Quality of life (QoL) outcomes: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scale (PedsQL)
Baseline; weeks 6 and 12
Participant perception of the GAS-Hem as a useful means of identifying and monitoring change in relevant goal areas
Week 12
Clinician perception of the GAS-Hem as a useful means of monitoring clinical progress in patient identified goal areas
Week 12
Number and Location of Bleeds
Within six months prior starting study through week 12 in the study
Study Arms (1)
Study participants
Participants with Hemophila A
Interventions
Licensed Factor VIII products. Study is brand agnostic
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with moderate to severe hemophilia A in the United States or Canada.
You may qualify if:
- Participant has a documented diagnosis of hemophilia A
- Participant has documented clotting factor levels of 5% or less
- Participant is on a prescribed regimen of continuous prophylaxis. Continuous prophylaxis is defined by the World Federation of Hemophilia as "… the intent of treating for 52 weeks a year and receiving a minimum of an a priori defined frequency of infusions for at least 45 weeks (85%) of the year under consideration"
- Participant is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol
- Participant is proficient in the English language to allow for use of the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) tool.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants with an active Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitory antibody (≥ 0.4 Bethesda units (BU) using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay or ≥ 0.6 BU using the Bethesda assay) at any time prior to screening
- Participant has been diagnosed with an inherited or acquired hemostatic defect other than hemophilia A (eg, qualitative platelet defect or von Willebrand's disease)
- Participant has participated in a clinical study involving a medicinal product or device within 30 days prior to enrollment or is scheduled to participate in a clinical study involving a medical product or device during the course of this study
- Participant is a family member or employee of the investigator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Bleeding and Clotting Disorders Institute
Peoria, Illinois, 61615, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
QEII Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3G1, Canada
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Study Director
Takeda
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2015
First Posted
February 5, 2016
Study Start
August 5, 2016
Primary Completion
November 2, 2016
Study Completion
November 2, 2016
Last Updated
March 17, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Access Criteria
- IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.