NCT02674997

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) as a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure to monitor clinical progress in participant-identified goal areas in individuals with hemophilia A.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2016

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
2 countries

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 24, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 5, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 5, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 2, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 2, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 17, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

November 24, 2015

Last Update Submit

March 15, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Goal settingFeasibilityStandardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem)Patient reported outcome (PRO)Goal attainment scaling (GAS)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change from baseline of the response to the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) outcomes tool

    The GAS-Hem is an online instrument for setting and tracking personalized goals related to hemophilia. The GAS-Hem uses a 5-point scale to record the degree of attainment in relation to individually defined goal areas between an established baseline (scaled as -1) and follow-up time points (here, 6 weeks and 12 weeks). The scale range is +2 (much better outcome) to -2 (much worse outcome), where 0 represents the desired outcome. The process includes a facilitator to ensure that the outcome descriptions for the scale levels are reasonably attainable (not too hard or too easy) and represent roughly equivalent change between levels (ie scores). The overall scoring formula results in a summary score of 50 when all goals are attained (individual goal attainment = 0). Scores \>50 indicate generally better than expected outcomes in goal attainment. Scores \<50 indicate that, overall, goals were not achieved. The overall total scores range is dependent on the average number of goals.

    Baseline; weeks 6 and 12

  • Change from baseline of the measurement of the responsiveness (sensitivity to change) of GAS-Hem compared with the SF-36

    Comparison of outcomes on the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) with the Medical Health Outcomes Study Health Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) measures. The analysis will compare effect sizes calculated for the GAS-Hem and the SF-36 using Cohen's d and standardized response means.

    Baseline; weeks 6 and 12

  • Change from baseline of the measurement of the responsiveness (sensitivity to change) of GAS-Hem compared with the PedQL

    Comparison of outcomes on the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) measures. The analysis will compare effect sizes calculated for the GAS-Hem and the PedsQL using Cohen's d and standardized response means.

    Baseline; weeks 6 and 12

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change from baseline of Quality of life (QoL) outcomes: Medical Health Outcomes Study Health Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36)

    Baseline; weeks 6 and 12

  • Change from baseline of Quality of life (QoL) outcomes: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scale (PedsQL)

    Baseline; weeks 6 and 12

  • Participant perception of the GAS-Hem as a useful means of identifying and monitoring change in relevant goal areas

    Week 12

  • Clinician perception of the GAS-Hem as a useful means of monitoring clinical progress in patient identified goal areas

    Week 12

  • Number and Location of Bleeds

    Within six months prior starting study through week 12 in the study

Study Arms (1)

Study participants

Participants with Hemophila A

Biological: Factor VIII

Interventions

Factor VIIIBIOLOGICAL

Licensed Factor VIII products. Study is brand agnostic

Also known as: FVIII
Study participants

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with moderate to severe hemophilia A in the United States or Canada.

You may qualify if:

  • Participant has a documented diagnosis of hemophilia A
  • Participant has documented clotting factor levels of 5% or less
  • Participant is on a prescribed regimen of continuous prophylaxis. Continuous prophylaxis is defined by the World Federation of Hemophilia as "… the intent of treating for 52 weeks a year and receiving a minimum of an a priori defined frequency of infusions for at least 45 weeks (85%) of the year under consideration"
  • Participant is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol
  • Participant is proficient in the English language to allow for use of the Standardized Goal Attainment Scaling menu for Hemophilia (GAS-Hem) tool.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants with an active Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitory antibody (≥ 0.4 Bethesda units (BU) using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay or ≥ 0.6 BU using the Bethesda assay) at any time prior to screening
  • Participant has been diagnosed with an inherited or acquired hemostatic defect other than hemophilia A (eg, qualitative platelet defect or von Willebrand's disease)
  • Participant has participated in a clinical study involving a medicinal product or device within 30 days prior to enrollment or is scheduled to participate in a clinical study involving a medical product or device during the course of this study
  • Participant is a family member or employee of the investigator

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Bleeding and Clotting Disorders Institute

Peoria, Illinois, 61615, United States

Location

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

St. Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada

Location

QEII Health Sciences Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3G1, Canada

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hemophilia A

Interventions

Factor VIII

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Blood Coagulation Disorders, InheritedBlood Coagulation DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesCoagulation Protein DisordersHemorrhagic DisordersGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Blood Coagulation FactorsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsProtein PrecursorsBiological Factors

Study Officials

  • Study Director

    Takeda

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2015

First Posted

February 5, 2016

Study Start

August 5, 2016

Primary Completion

November 2, 2016

Study Completion

November 2, 2016

Last Updated

March 17, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Access Criteria
IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
More information

Locations