Computed Tomography Arteriograms (CTA) Volume Dose Reduction Study
Does Reduction in Contrast Administration Dose in Computed Tomography Arteriograms Degrade Image Quality? A Single Institutional Review of an Ultra-low Contrast Dose Protocol
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine if the dose of contrast (Omnipaque) administered for Computed Tomography Arteriograms (CTA) can be reduced without degradation of image quality. The hypothesis is that there is no difference in image quality using ultra-low dose contrast in CTA exams compared to routine, standard of care dose exams.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 11, 2019
CompletedJune 11, 2019
May 1, 2019
1.2 years
January 21, 2016
April 1, 2019
May 17, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Ascending Sinotubular Junction Measurement
Following image acquisition, quantitative analysis was performed by measurement of the attenuation of the contrast bolus by use of Hounsfield Units. Measurement was taken at the ascending aorta near the sinotubular junction.
At 30 days
Descending Thoracic Aorta Measurement
Following image acquisition, quantitative analysis was performed by measurement of the attenuation of the contrast bolus by use of Hounsfield Units. A measurement was taken from the distal abdominal aorta prior to the bifurcation.
30 days
Celiac Measurement
Following image acquisition, quantitative analysis was performed by measurement of the attenuation of the contrast bolus by use of Hounsfield Units. A measurement was taken from the proximal abdominal aorta at the level of the celiac axis.
30 days
Burfication Measurement
Following image acquisition, quantitative analysis was performed by measurement of the attenuation of the contrast bolus by use of Hounsfield Units. A measurement was taken from the distal abdominal aorta prior to the bifurcation.
30 days
Right Common Femoral Artery Measurement
Following image acquisition, quantitative analysis was performed by measurement of the attenuation of the contrast bolus by use of Hounsfield Units. A measurement was taken from the right common femoral artery.
30 days
Left Common Femoral Artery Measurement
Following image acquisition, quantitative analysis was performed by measurement of the attenuation of the contrast bolus by use of Hounsfield Units. A measurement was taken from the right common femoral artery.
30 days
CTA Vessel Opacification Grading 1
5 Point Grading Scale was used to determine CTA Vessel Opacification by a Board Certified Radiologist. 1. Poor opacification with no difference in attenuation of the lumen compared to the wall of the vessel. Non diagnostic. 2. Decreased opacification. Little to no difference in attenuation between the lumen and the wall. Non diagnostic. 3. Moderate opacification of the lumen of the vessel. Diagnostic study. 4. Good opacification of the lumen of the vessel. 5. Excellent opacification of the lumen of the vessel with distinct difference in attenuation of the wall and lumen of the vessel.
30 days
CTA Vessel Opacification Grading 2
5 Point Grading Scale was used to determine CTA Vessel Opacification by a second Board Certified Radiologist. 1. Poor opacification with no difference in attenuation of the lumen compared to the wall of the vessel. Non diagnostic. 2. Decreased opacification. Little to no difference in attenuation between the lumen and the wall. Non diagnostic. 3. Moderate opacification of the lumen of the vessel. Diagnostic 4. Good opacification of the lumen of the vessel. 5. Excellent opacification of the lumen of the vessel with distinct difference in attenuation of the wall and lumen of the vessel.
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Low Dose Contrast (40mL)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCTA of the chest: 40 mL of intravenous contrast at a rate of 5mL/sec. A region of interest (ROI) to trigger the scan will be placed in the aortic arch. If scan is performed using high pitch helical mode, the scan delay will be increased by 2 seconds. The Low Dose scan will then be compared to the standard of care high dose scan of the same area taken at a previous date.
Low Dose Contrast (50mL)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCTA of the abdomen OR or CTA of the chest and abdomen or CTA of the abdomen and pelvis or CTA of the chest, abdomen and pelvis: 50 mL of intravenous contrast at a rate 5mL/sec. A region of interest (ROI) to trigger the scan will be placed in the aortic arch. If scan is performed using high pitch helical mode, the scan delay will be increased by 2 seconds. The Low Dose scan will then be compared to the standard of care high dose scan of the same area taken at a previous date.
Interventions
The patient will be administered a low dose, 40mL of intravenous contrast (Omnipaque) at a rate of 5mL/sec based on the area of the body being scanned (chest versus chest and abdomen versus chest, abdomen and pelvis). This will be compared to the patient's prior examination performed with 100mL of intravenous contrast at a rate of 4mL/sec.
The patient will be administered a low dose, 50mL of intravenous contrast (Omnipaque) at a rate of 5mL/sec based on the area of the body being scanned (chest versus chest and abdomen versus chest, abdomen and pelvis). This will be compared to the patient's prior examination performed with 100mL of intravenous contrast at a rate of 4mL/sec.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any adult patient scheduled for a computed tomographic arteriogram (CTA) of the chest or chest, abdomen and pelvis who had undergone a prior CTA performed with the standard contrast dose (100 mL) at this institution will be included in the study
- The follow-up scan will be routine standard of care, no emergency imaging patient will be approached for this research
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with no prior CTA imaging for comparison
- Any pediatric patient (age \<18)
- BMI \>40
- Inability to follow instructions
- Allergy to intravenous contrast
- GFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Related Publications (10)
Seehofnerova A, Kok M, Mihl C, Douwes D, Sailer A, Nijssen E, de Haan MJ, Wildberger JE, Das M. Feasibility of low contrast media volume in CT angiography of the aorta. Eur J Radiol Open. 2015 Apr 28;2:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2015.03.001. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26937437BACKGROUNDRubin GD. MDCT imaging of the aorta and peripheral vessels. Eur J Radiol. 2003 Mar;45 Suppl 1:S42-9. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(03)00036-6.
PMID: 12598026BACKGROUNDGleeson TG, Bulugahapitiya S. Contrast-induced nephropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Dec;183(6):1673-89. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831673. No abstract available.
PMID: 15547209BACKGROUNDVanommeslaeghe F, De Mulder E, Van de Bruaene C, Van de Bruaene L, Lameire N, Van Biesen W. Selecting a strategy for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in clinical practice: an evaluation of different clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE tool. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Aug;30(8):1300-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv220. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
PMID: 26047631BACKGROUNDMeschi M, Detrenis S, Musini S, Strada E, Savazzi G. Facts and fallacies concerning the prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy. Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):2060-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000227651.73500.BA.
PMID: 16763513BACKGROUNDWalsh SR, Tang T, Gaunt ME, Boyle JR. Contrast-induced nephropathy. J Endovasc Ther. 2007 Feb;14(1):92-100. doi: 10.1583/06-2035.1.
PMID: 17291156BACKGROUNDGussenhoven MJ, Ravensbergen J, van Bockel JH, Feuth JD, Aarts JC. Renal dysfunction after angiography; a risk factor analysis in patients with peripheral vascular disease. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1991 Jan-Feb;32(1):81-6.
PMID: 2010458BACKGROUNDDiehm N, Pena C, Benenati JF, Tsoukas AI, Katzen BT. Adequacy of an early arterial phase low-volume contrast protocol in 64-detector computed tomography angiography for aortoiliac aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Mar;47(3):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.004.
PMID: 18295101BACKGROUNDViteri-Ramirez G, Garcia-Lallana A, Simon-Yarza I, Broncano J, Ferreira M, Pueyo JC, Villanueva A, Bastarrika G. Low radiation and low-contrast dose pulmonary CT angiography: Comparison of 80 kVp/60 ml and 100 kVp/80 ml protocols. Clin Radiol. 2012 Sep;67(9):833-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.11.016. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
PMID: 22683247BACKGROUNDWu CC, Lee EW, Suh RD, Levine BS, Barack BM. Pulmonary 64-MDCT angiography with 30 mL of IV contrast material: vascular enhancement and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Dec;199(6):1247-51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8739.
PMID: 23169715BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Rekha Cherian, M.D.
- Organization
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2016
First Posted
February 1, 2016
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2018
Last Updated
June 11, 2019
Results First Posted
June 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05