NCT02669784

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if the dose of contrast (Omnipaque) administered for Computed Tomography Arteriograms (CTA) can be reduced without degradation of image quality. The hypothesis is that there is no difference in image quality using ultra-low dose contrast in CTA exams compared to routine, standard of care dose exams.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 21, 2016

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2016

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 11, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 11, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

January 21, 2016

Results QC Date

April 1, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 17, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Ascending Sinotubular Junction Measurement

    Following image acquisition, quantitative analysis was performed by measurement of the attenuation of the contrast bolus by use of Hounsfield Units. Measurement was taken at the ascending aorta near the sinotubular junction.

    At 30 days

  • Descending Thoracic Aorta Measurement

    Following image acquisition, quantitative analysis was performed by measurement of the attenuation of the contrast bolus by use of Hounsfield Units. A measurement was taken from the distal abdominal aorta prior to the bifurcation.

    30 days

  • Celiac Measurement

    Following image acquisition, quantitative analysis was performed by measurement of the attenuation of the contrast bolus by use of Hounsfield Units. A measurement was taken from the proximal abdominal aorta at the level of the celiac axis.

    30 days

  • Burfication Measurement

    Following image acquisition, quantitative analysis was performed by measurement of the attenuation of the contrast bolus by use of Hounsfield Units. A measurement was taken from the distal abdominal aorta prior to the bifurcation.

    30 days

  • Right Common Femoral Artery Measurement

    Following image acquisition, quantitative analysis was performed by measurement of the attenuation of the contrast bolus by use of Hounsfield Units. A measurement was taken from the right common femoral artery.

    30 days

  • Left Common Femoral Artery Measurement

    Following image acquisition, quantitative analysis was performed by measurement of the attenuation of the contrast bolus by use of Hounsfield Units. A measurement was taken from the right common femoral artery.

    30 days

  • CTA Vessel Opacification Grading 1

    5 Point Grading Scale was used to determine CTA Vessel Opacification by a Board Certified Radiologist. 1. Poor opacification with no difference in attenuation of the lumen compared to the wall of the vessel. Non diagnostic. 2. Decreased opacification. Little to no difference in attenuation between the lumen and the wall. Non diagnostic. 3. Moderate opacification of the lumen of the vessel. Diagnostic study. 4. Good opacification of the lumen of the vessel. 5. Excellent opacification of the lumen of the vessel with distinct difference in attenuation of the wall and lumen of the vessel.

    30 days

  • CTA Vessel Opacification Grading 2

    5 Point Grading Scale was used to determine CTA Vessel Opacification by a second Board Certified Radiologist. 1. Poor opacification with no difference in attenuation of the lumen compared to the wall of the vessel. Non diagnostic. 2. Decreased opacification. Little to no difference in attenuation between the lumen and the wall. Non diagnostic. 3. Moderate opacification of the lumen of the vessel. Diagnostic 4. Good opacification of the lumen of the vessel. 5. Excellent opacification of the lumen of the vessel with distinct difference in attenuation of the wall and lumen of the vessel.

    30 days

Study Arms (2)

Low Dose Contrast (40mL)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

CTA of the chest: 40 mL of intravenous contrast at a rate of 5mL/sec. A region of interest (ROI) to trigger the scan will be placed in the aortic arch. If scan is performed using high pitch helical mode, the scan delay will be increased by 2 seconds. The Low Dose scan will then be compared to the standard of care high dose scan of the same area taken at a previous date.

Drug: Low Dose Contrast (Omnipaque) 40mL

Low Dose Contrast (50mL)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

CTA of the abdomen OR or CTA of the chest and abdomen or CTA of the abdomen and pelvis or CTA of the chest, abdomen and pelvis: 50 mL of intravenous contrast at a rate 5mL/sec. A region of interest (ROI) to trigger the scan will be placed in the aortic arch. If scan is performed using high pitch helical mode, the scan delay will be increased by 2 seconds. The Low Dose scan will then be compared to the standard of care high dose scan of the same area taken at a previous date.

Drug: Low Dose Contrast (Omnipaque) 50 mL

Interventions

The patient will be administered a low dose, 40mL of intravenous contrast (Omnipaque) at a rate of 5mL/sec based on the area of the body being scanned (chest versus chest and abdomen versus chest, abdomen and pelvis). This will be compared to the patient's prior examination performed with 100mL of intravenous contrast at a rate of 4mL/sec.

Low Dose Contrast (40mL)

The patient will be administered a low dose, 50mL of intravenous contrast (Omnipaque) at a rate of 5mL/sec based on the area of the body being scanned (chest versus chest and abdomen versus chest, abdomen and pelvis). This will be compared to the patient's prior examination performed with 100mL of intravenous contrast at a rate of 4mL/sec.

Low Dose Contrast (50mL)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Any adult patient scheduled for a computed tomographic arteriogram (CTA) of the chest or chest, abdomen and pelvis who had undergone a prior CTA performed with the standard contrast dose (100 mL) at this institution will be included in the study
  • The follow-up scan will be routine standard of care, no emergency imaging patient will be approached for this research

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with no prior CTA imaging for comparison
  • Any pediatric patient (age \<18)
  • BMI \>40
  • Inability to follow instructions
  • Allergy to intravenous contrast
  • GFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Seehofnerova A, Kok M, Mihl C, Douwes D, Sailer A, Nijssen E, de Haan MJ, Wildberger JE, Das M. Feasibility of low contrast media volume in CT angiography of the aorta. Eur J Radiol Open. 2015 Apr 28;2:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2015.03.001. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26937437BACKGROUND
  • Rubin GD. MDCT imaging of the aorta and peripheral vessels. Eur J Radiol. 2003 Mar;45 Suppl 1:S42-9. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(03)00036-6.

    PMID: 12598026BACKGROUND
  • Gleeson TG, Bulugahapitiya S. Contrast-induced nephropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Dec;183(6):1673-89. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831673. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15547209BACKGROUND
  • Vanommeslaeghe F, De Mulder E, Van de Bruaene C, Van de Bruaene L, Lameire N, Van Biesen W. Selecting a strategy for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in clinical practice: an evaluation of different clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE tool. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Aug;30(8):1300-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv220. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

    PMID: 26047631BACKGROUND
  • Meschi M, Detrenis S, Musini S, Strada E, Savazzi G. Facts and fallacies concerning the prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy. Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):2060-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000227651.73500.BA.

    PMID: 16763513BACKGROUND
  • Walsh SR, Tang T, Gaunt ME, Boyle JR. Contrast-induced nephropathy. J Endovasc Ther. 2007 Feb;14(1):92-100. doi: 10.1583/06-2035.1.

    PMID: 17291156BACKGROUND
  • Gussenhoven MJ, Ravensbergen J, van Bockel JH, Feuth JD, Aarts JC. Renal dysfunction after angiography; a risk factor analysis in patients with peripheral vascular disease. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1991 Jan-Feb;32(1):81-6.

    PMID: 2010458BACKGROUND
  • Diehm N, Pena C, Benenati JF, Tsoukas AI, Katzen BT. Adequacy of an early arterial phase low-volume contrast protocol in 64-detector computed tomography angiography for aortoiliac aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Mar;47(3):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.004.

    PMID: 18295101BACKGROUND
  • Viteri-Ramirez G, Garcia-Lallana A, Simon-Yarza I, Broncano J, Ferreira M, Pueyo JC, Villanueva A, Bastarrika G. Low radiation and low-contrast dose pulmonary CT angiography: Comparison of 80 kVp/60 ml and 100 kVp/80 ml protocols. Clin Radiol. 2012 Sep;67(9):833-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.11.016. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

    PMID: 22683247BACKGROUND
  • Wu CC, Lee EW, Suh RD, Levine BS, Barack BM. Pulmonary 64-MDCT angiography with 30 mL of IV contrast material: vascular enhancement and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Dec;199(6):1247-51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8739.

    PMID: 23169715BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic Aneurysm

Interventions

Contrast MediaIohexol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AneurysmVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesAortic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic Uses of ChemicalsPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesSpecialty Uses of ChemicalsTriiodobenzoic AcidsIodobenzoatesBenzoatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbons

Results Point of Contact

Title
Rekha Cherian, M.D.
Organization
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2016

First Posted

February 1, 2016

Study Start

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion

May 1, 2017

Study Completion

November 1, 2018

Last Updated

June 11, 2019

Results First Posted

June 11, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Locations