NCT02292927

Brief Summary

DESIGN: Single-centre, feasibility study AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the acceptability and pre-operative impact on functional capacity of a trimodal prehabilitation program in a cohort of patients undergoing aneurysm repair. This will enable the design (feasibility and power) of a large scale Randomised Controlled Trial. Expected outcomes

  • The potential number of patients who would benefit, the compliance and acceptability of a pre-operative prehabilitation programme will be calculated.
  • Preoperatively, expected at 6-weeks, the change in physical fitness of patients (assessed by the physical function section of SF-36 and measured with peak flow/6-minute walk testing) during the pre-operative phase will be assessed in both groups.
  • The effects on quality of life, anxiety and depression on each study participant will be assessed immediately pre-op, expected at 6-weeks.
  • The number of patients who are able to reduce or cease smoking will be reported during the pre-op phase (expected at 6 weeks), as will length of hospital stay after aortic surgery, expected at 6-8 weeks. POPULATION: Patients undergoing planned elective aortic surgery procedures ELIGIBILITY: Adult patients (over 18 years) undergoing elective open and endovascular aneurysm repair with capacity to consent and physical fitness to undergo an pre-operative exercise programme DURATION: 1 year from 1st June 2014

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2014

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 6, 2014

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 18, 2014

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 17, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 17, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 6, 2014

Results QC Date

September 7, 2016

Last Update Submit

May 7, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • The Number of Patients Who Accepted Inclusion Into a Pre-operative Prehabilitation Programme

    This describes the number of people within the study who were in the pre-habilitation study arm that accepted and completed the pre-habilitation training

    Collected at screening

  • Change From Baseline in Metabolic Equivalents (METS) at Six Weeks

    • Metabolic equivalent level is a measure of physical fitness. One MET is defined as 3.5 mL 02 uptake/kg per minute which is the resting oxygen uptake in a sitting position. The achieved exercise capacity in METs has been shown to be predictive in older adult population of survival with higher MET levels associated with improved survival," or similar definition that is accurate and appropriate.

    Collected at baseline and (expected) 6 weeks

  • Decrease in Anxiety and Depression Scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)

    HADS is a validated questionnaire consisting of 7 statements relating to anxiety and 7 statements relating to depression. Each statement is scored between 0 and 3 giving a total score of up to 21 for each section. A score of 0-7 is assumed to be normal and score greater than this suggestive of a mood disorder

    Collected at baseline and (expected) 6 weeks

  • Number of Participants With Attendance at the Physical and Psychological and Social Training Appointments of the Rehabilitation Programme (Assessed by Bespoke Questionnaire)

    Collected at baseline and during the study

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • HDU/ITU Resource Use (Number of Days Stay)

    Collected at (expected) 6 weeks +hospital stay

  • LOS

    Collected at (expected) 6 weeks +hospital stay

Study Arms (2)

Pre-intervention

NO INTERVENTION

Patients treated as standard before intervention

Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Introduction of rehabilitation program

Behavioral: Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation

Interventions

Introduction of a physical exercise training programme, psychological counselling and smoking cessation advice

Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 95 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- patients undergoing elective repair, willing/able to undertake a period of prehabilitation, and those able to comprehend and retain instructions regarding self-training.

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Symptomatic patients or those undergoing urgent treatment (\< 2 weeks)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (14)

  • Rooks DS, Huang J, Bierbaum BE, Bolus SA, Rubano J, Connolly CE, Alpert S, Iversen MD, Katz JN. Effect of preoperative exercise on measures of functional status in men and women undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct 15;55(5):700-8. doi: 10.1002/art.22223.

    PMID: 17013852BACKGROUND
  • Mayo NE, Feldman L, Scott S, Zavorsky G, Kim DJ, Charlebois P, Stein B, Carli F. Impact of preoperative change in physical function on postoperative recovery: argument supporting prehabilitation for colorectal surgery. Surgery. 2011 Sep;150(3):505-14. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.045.

    PMID: 21878237BACKGROUND
  • Kim DJ, Mayo NE, Carli F, Montgomery DL, Zavorsky GS. Responsive measures to prehabilitation in patients undergoing bowel resection surgery. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009 Feb;217(2):109-15. doi: 10.1620/tjem.217.109.

    PMID: 19212103BACKGROUND
  • Li C, Carli F, Lee L, Charlebois P, Stein B, Liberman AS, Kaneva P, Augustin B, Wongyingsinn M, Gamsa A, Kim DJ, Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS. Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1072-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2560-5. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

    PMID: 23052535BACKGROUND
  • Carli F, Charlebois P, Stein B, Feldman L, Zavorsky G, Kim DJ, Scott S, Mayo NE. Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1187-97. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7102.

    PMID: 20602503BACKGROUND
  • Dunckley M, Ellard D, Quinn T, Barlow J. Coronary artery bypass grafting: patients' and health professionals' views of recovery after hospital discharge. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008 Mar;7(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Jul 23.

    PMID: 17644041BACKGROUND
  • Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Page GG, Marucha PT, MacCallum RC, Glaser R. Psychological influences on surgical recovery. Perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Am Psychol. 1998 Nov;53(11):1209-18. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.53.11.1209.

    PMID: 9830373BACKGROUND
  • Devine EC. Effects of psychoeducational care for adult surgical patients: a meta-analysis of 191 studies. Patient Educ Couns. 1992 Apr;19(2):129-42. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(92)90193-m.

    PMID: 1299818BACKGROUND
  • Mumford E, Schlesinger HJ, Glass GV. The effect of psychological intervention on recovery from surgery and heart attacks: an analysis of the literature. Am J Public Health. 1982 Feb;72(2):141-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.2.141.

    PMID: 7055315BACKGROUND
  • Furze G, Dumville JC, Miles JN, Irvine K, Thompson DR, Lewin RJ. "Prehabilitation" prior to CABG surgery improves physical functioning and depression. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 6;132(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Aug 15.

    PMID: 18703241BACKGROUND
  • Owen D, Bicknell C, Hilton C, Lind J, Jalloh I, Owen M, Harrison R. Preoperative smoking cessation: a questionnaire study. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;61(12):2002-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01565..x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.

    PMID: 17850308BACKGROUND
  • Arthur HM, Daniels C, McKelvie R, Hirsh J, Rush B. Effect of a preoperative intervention on preoperative and postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Aug 15;133(4):253-62. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-4-200008150-00007.

    PMID: 10929164BACKGROUND
  • Cunningham MA, Swanson V, O'Carroll RE, Holdsworth RJ. Randomized clinical trial of a brief psychological intervention to increase walking in patients with intermittent claudication. Br J Surg. 2012 Jan;99(1):49-56. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7714. Epub 2011 Oct 28.

    PMID: 22038532BACKGROUND
  • Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, Cobb FR, Pryor DB. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 15;64(10):651-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90496-7.

    PMID: 2782256BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic Aneurysm

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AneurysmVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesAortic Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

There was a significant failure in patients undergoing METS and HADS assessment prior to surgery and therefore the results of this pilot study are limited to a lot study of whether patients accepted this intensive rehabilitation study.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Colin Bicknell
Organization
Imperial Colege London

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Open label
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2014

First Posted

November 18, 2014

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

July 17, 2019

Results First Posted

July 17, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

This trial did not complete as expected and therefore there are no meaningful participant data to share.