NCT02667821

Brief Summary

The Investigators are performing a study to determine, in patients with chronic/recurrent neck pain, the cerebrovascular hemodynamic consequences of cervical spine movements, including manipulation, in vivo using fMRI technology on vertebral and cranial blood flow dynamics affecting brain perfusion, and extend the current data set on these variables

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2016

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 29, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 12, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 10, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

January 18, 2016

Results QC Date

July 19, 2017

Last Update Submit

September 11, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in Blood Flow Through the Vertebral Artery and Posterior Cerebral and Cerebellar Circulation

    Phase contrast MRI provides velocity measurements that can be used for analysis of the blood flow and tissue motion. At the level of C1-2, the contralateral and ipsilateral vertebral arteries (VA), defined to the direction of head motion, were assessed and anatomical images were established to localize the VA circulation. Mean and SDs were calculated for VA blood velocity (cm/s) for each of the head conditions and VA side. Differences between task maneuvers and VA flow and velocity were evaluated using a repeated-measures analysis of variance with factors of head position and VA side, and a level of significance was set at .05

    The series of fMRI sequences will be performed on each participant immediately after each condition. Through study completion, data will be presented after an average of 1 year.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in Tissue Perfusion in the Posterior Cerebrum and Cerebellum Will be Assessed Using Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI Technique.

    The series of ASL sequences will be performed on each participant immediately after each condition. Through study completion, data will be presented after an average of 1 year.

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in Blood Flow Through Vertebral Artery

    The series of fMRI sequences will be performed on each participant immediately after each procedure.

Study Arms (1)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants included in the experimental arm will be adults aged 18 years and older with chronic/recurrent neck pain Grade II who have been prescribed cervical manipulation for treatment of their condition. Each participant will undergo three separate test maneuvers consistent with prior work completed at the St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton Brain Body Institute. Each participant will begin with neutral cervical spine as a standard natural control, followed by block randomization between maximum voluntary rotation of the cervical spine and one cervical manipulation. Please see Intervention section for a detailed description.

Other: Head positions and spinal manipulation

Interventions

Each participant will undergo three separate test maneuvers. Neutral (0° rotation) neck position (condition 1) will be followed by block randomization between maximum voluntary rotation (condition 2) and a high-velocity-low-amplitude cervical manipulation targeted at C1-C2 (condition 3). Conditions 1 and 2 will be held for 1 minute before returning to neutral alignment. For the manipulation, the head will be repositioned at neutrality immediate. An experienced practitioner will perform the manipulation on the adjustable and pivotal MRI bed. After each condition, MRI of the upper neck and cerebrum for perfusion and blood flow will ensue.

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 18 years and older with chronic/recurrent neck pain Grade II.
  • Must have been prescribed cervical spinal manipulation for treatment of their neck pain condition.

You may not qualify if:

  • A history of neck pain with associated arm pain within the last 6 months
  • Any current or history of neurologic symptoms including facial or extremity weakness, abnormal sensation to the face, body, or extremities, uncontrolled movements, abnormal gait, dizziness, unexplained nausea/vomiting, difficulty with speaking or swallowing
  • History of new or severe (Visual Analogue Scale \>6) headaches in the last 3 months
  • Any contraindications to MRI
  • Any history of using drugs that affect blood flow such as Warfarin, or anti-coagulants.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

St. Joseph Healthcare, Research Imaging Institute

Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Boyle E, Cote P, Grier AR, Cassidy JD. Examining vertebrobasilar artery stroke in two Canadian provinces. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2 Suppl):S194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.019.

    PMID: 19251064BACKGROUND
  • Cassidy JD, Boyle E, Cote P, He Y, Hogg-Johnson S, Silver FL, Bondy SJ. Risk of vertebrobasilar stroke and chiropractic care: results of a population-based case-control and case-crossover study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2 Suppl):S201-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.020.

    PMID: 19251066BACKGROUND
  • Rubinstein SM, Peerdeman SM, van Tulder MW, Riphagen I, Haldeman S. A systematic review of the risk factors for cervical artery dissection. Stroke. 2005 Jul;36(7):1575-80. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000169919.73219.30. Epub 2005 Jun 2.

    PMID: 15933263BACKGROUND
  • Zaina C, Grant R, Johnson C, Dansie B, Taylor J, Spyropolous P. The effect of cervical rotation on blood flow in the contralateral vertebral artery. Man Ther. 2003 May;8(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/s1356-689x(02)00155-8.

    PMID: 12890438BACKGROUND
  • Cagnie B, Jacobs F, Barbaix E, Vinck E, Dierckx R, Cambier D. Changes in cerebellar blood flow after manipulation of the cervical spine using Technetium 99m-ethyl cysteinate dimer. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Feb;28(2):103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.01.005.

    PMID: 15800509BACKGROUND
  • Mitchell JA. Changes in vertebral artery blood flow following normal rotation of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Jul-Aug;26(6):347-51. doi: 10.1016/S0161-4754(03)00074-5.

    PMID: 12902962BACKGROUND
  • Johnson C, Grant R, Dansie B, Taylor J, Spyropolous P. Measurement of blood flow in the vertebral artery using colour duplex Doppler ultrasound: establishment of the reliability of selected parameters. Man Ther. 2000 Feb;5(1):21-9. doi: 10.1054/math.1999.0227.

    PMID: 10688956BACKGROUND
  • Sakaguchi M, Kitagawa K, Hougaku H, Hashimoto H, Nagai Y, Yamagami H, Ohtsuki T, Oku N, Hashikawa K, Matsushita K, Matsumoto M, Hori M. Mechanical compression of the extracranial vertebral artery during neck rotation. Neurology. 2003 Sep 23;61(6):845-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000078081.12097.ae.

    PMID: 14504337BACKGROUND
  • Haynes MJ. Doppler studies comparing the effects of cervical rotation and lateral flexion on vertebral artery blood flow. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996 Jul-Aug;19(6):378-84.

    PMID: 8864968BACKGROUND
  • Licht PB, Christensen HW, Hojgaard P, Hoilund-Carlsen PF. Triplex ultrasound of vertebral artery flow during cervical rotation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Jan;21(1):27-31.

    PMID: 9467098BACKGROUND
  • Licht PB, Christensen HW, Svendensen P, Hoilund-Carlsen PF. Vertebral artery flow and cervical manipulation: an experimental study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Sep;22(7):431-5. doi: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70030-8.

    PMID: 10519558BACKGROUND
  • Bendick PJ, Jackson VP. Evaluation of the vertebral arteries with duplex sonography. J Vasc Surg. 1986 Mar;3(3):523-30. doi: 10.1067/mva.1986.avs0030523.

    PMID: 3512861BACKGROUND
  • Moser N, Mior S, Noseworthy M, Cote P, Wells G, Behr M, Triano J. Effect of cervical manipulation on vertebral artery and cerebral haemodynamics in patients with chronic neck pain: a crossover randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 May 28;9(5):e025219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025219.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vertebral Artery DissectionStroke

Interventions

Manipulation, Spinal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular TraumaCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemDissection, Blood VesselAneurysmVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Musculoskeletal ManipulationsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTherapeuticsRehabilitation

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Nicholas Moser
Organization
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

Study Officials

  • Greg Wells, PhD

    University of Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Nicholas Moser, BSc, Dc

    Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • John J Triano, DC, PhD

    Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Michael Noseworthy, PhD

    McMaster University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Silvano Mior, DC, PhD

    Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Local contact investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2016

First Posted

January 29, 2016

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

May 1, 2017

Study Completion

May 1, 2017

Last Updated

October 10, 2017

Results First Posted

September 12, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Study results will be made public through peer-reviewed journal publications, presentations, clinical trial registration and report to participants. If participants are interested in information on the outcome of the study they may request a report from their own data and / or aggregated data either at the time of consent and data capture by signing an area on the informed consent document or subsequently by written request to the principal investigator. ROF will be submitted to indexed and peer-reviewed journals interested in imaging and clinical biomechanics of the spine.

Locations