Assess the Efficacy and Safety in Volunteers of DCF100, TIB200 and SPR300 vs. Placebo and Control(s) in a UV Pain Model
A Randomised, Double Blind, Cross Over Clinical Study in Healthy Human Volunteers to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Three Different Topical Analgesics (DCF100, TIB200 And SPR300) Versus in a Model of UV-Induced Inflammatory Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a randomised, double blind, cross over clinical study in healthy human volunteers (including pharmacokinetic \[PK\] sampling and laser Doppler assessment of local blood flow in a subset of up to 6 subjects per cohort of 20) to assess the efficacy and safety of three different topical analgesics (DCF100, TIB200 and SPR300) versus placebo and active control(s) in a model of UV-induced inflammatory pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 pain
Started Mar 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_1 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 29, 2020
CompletedJanuary 27, 2021
January 1, 2021
2 months
January 20, 2016
December 14, 2019
January 11, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Heat Pain Tolerance Test (HPTT) Measured the Point at Which the Heat Became Painful - Degrees Centigrade -
To assess the pharmacodynamic effect by Heat Pain Tolerance Test (HPTT) which measured the point at which the heat became painful (degrees centigrade) of three topical analgesics, DCF100, TIB200, and SPR300 versus topical placebo and active topical reference products in a model of UV-induced inflammatory pain.
15 minutes before to 6 hours post administration
Intensity of the UVB-induced Erythema (Determined by Assessment of Skin Blood Flow by Laser Doppler Imaging [Flux Units])
Intensity of the Ultra Violet B radiation (UVB)-induced erythema (determined by assessment of skin blood flow by laser Doppler imaging \[flux units\], up to 8 subjects per cohort) - Change from baseline
15 minutes before to 6 hours post administration
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
15 minutes before and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post administration
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve
15 minutes before and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post administration
Number of Recorded Abnormal Clinical Assessments
Estimated study duration for each subject will be approximately 6 weeks
Physical Exams to Ensure Safety and Well Being of the Subjects
Estimated study duration for each subject will be approximately 6 weeks
Adverse Events (AEs)
Estimated study duration for each subject will be approximately 6 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (11)
Cohort 1: TIB200 gel 10%
EXPERIMENTALAll Cohort 1 participants: TIB200 gel (10%, w/w ibuprofen)
Cohort 1: Nurofen gel 10%
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll Cohort 1 participants: Nurofen Max Strength gel (10%, w/w ibuprofen)
Cohort 1: Nurofen tablets
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll Cohort 1 participants: Nurofen oral tablets (2 x 400 mg ibuprofen)
Cohort 1: TIB200 Placebo gel
PLACEBO COMPARATORAll Cohort 1 Participants: TIB200 matching placebo gel
Cohort 2: DCF100 gel 2%
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll Cohort 2 Participants: DCF100 gel (2% w/w diclofenac)
Cohort 2: DCF100 gel 4%
EXPERIMENTALAll Cohort 2 Participants: DCF100 gel (4% w/w diclofenac)
Cohort 2: Voltaren gel 2%
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll Cohort 2 Participants: Voltaren Emulgel (2% diclofenac)
Cohort 2: Voltarol oral tablet
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll Cohort 2 Participants: Voltarol oral tablet (50 mg - diclofenac)
Cohort 2: DCF100 Placebo gel
PLACEBO COMPARATORAll Cohort 2 Participants: DCF100 matching placebo gel
Cohort 3: SPR300 gel (15%:7%)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll Cohort 3 Participants: Methyl-salicylate / Menthol, SPR300 gel (15%:7%, w/w; ratio of Methylsalicylate / Menthol)
Cohort 3: SPR300 Placebo gel
PLACEBO COMPARATORAll Cohort 3 Participants: SPR300 matching placebo gel
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Were able to provide written informed consent.
- Male between 18 and 65 years old, inclusive, at the time of screening.
- Good general health as ascertained by detailed medical history and physical examination.
- Body mass index (BMI) ≥18 and ≤29 kg/m2 (BMI = weight/height2), at the time of screening.
- No clinically relevant abnormalities in 12-lead ECG as per PI's judgement, e.g., absence of cardiac rhythm disorder, in particular bradycardia (\<40 beats per minute), conduction abnormalities such as atrioventricular block, absence of active ischemia (such as unstable angina pectoris) or recent myocardial infarction, no QTcF interval \>450 milliseconds, no QRS complex ≥120 milliseconds, at Screening.
- No clinically relevant abnormalities in results of laboratory tests as per PI's judgement; in particular, no significant liver impairment defined as aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN); no significant kidney impairment defined as serum creatinine 2x ULN; abnormal thyroid function as defined by thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and total thyroxin (T4) (TSH within range 0.27 to 4.2 mIU/L, total T4 within range 59 to 154 nmol/L).
- Had a skin type II or III (Fitz Patrick classification).
- Non-smokers or ex-smokers for at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit, as confirmed by a urine cotinine test.
- Subjects were able to communicate well with the PI/designee. -
You may not qualify if:
- History of hypersensitivity to the IMP or any of the excipients or to medicinal products with similar chemical structures.
- Presence of any clinically relevant acute or chronic disease which could interfere with the subject safety during the study, expose the subject to undue risk, limit the biological sampling (e.g., blood collection), interfere with the absorption of the IMP (e.g., active dermatological conditions at the application sites, or ulcers, irritable bowel syndrome) or interfere with the study objectives.
- Skin type I, IV, V or VI (Fitzpatrick Classification).
- History of chronic pain symptoms (\>6 months) or ongoing pain.
- Any condition that required regular concomitant medication including herbal products, or predicted need of any concomitant medication from Screening Visit until the end of the study.
- Intake of any medication including over the counter (OTC) medication (in particular any pain killers), herbal and dietary supplements such as St John's Wort, vitamins and minerals that could affect the outcome of the study, within 48 hours before the first administration of the investigational product and for the duration of the study.
- Use of photosensitising medication, such as phenothiazines, tetracyclines, quinolones, sulphonamides, nalidixic acid, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, furosemides, hydrochlorothiazides, fibrate, phytotherapeutic drugs (herbal supplements), phenothiazines, quinidines, psoralens and amiodarone within 4 weeks before the first UVB irradiation and for the duration of the study.
- Any skin disease, acute or chronic (e.g., psoriasis vulgaris, neurodermatitis) or auto immune diseases associated with increased light sensitisation.
- Any active dermatological conditions, local pigmentary disorders, body art (e.g., tattoos), or excessive hair growth at the lower back that might interfere with the study assessments or absorption of the IMP.
- History of skin cancer (i.e., melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma).
- History of conditions that increase risk for melanoma (e.g., dysplastic nevus \[\>5 nevi\], xeroderma pigmentosum, Fanconi anaemia, Bloom's syndrome, Werner syndrome, Cockayne syndrome, trichothiodystrophy, or familial mole melanoma syndrome).
- History of bleeding disorders, peptic ulceration or gastro intestinal bleeding, heart burn, cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction or stroke.
- Inability to give reproducible HPPT ratings on naïve skin at screening, (defined as HPTT test re-test difference ≥1.0 °C)
- Heat pain perception threshold \<40°C or \>51°C on naïve skin at Screening.
- Supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<90 mmHg or \>140 mmHg, or supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \<50 mmHg or \>90 mmHg after 5 minutes supine, at the Screening Visit.
- +12 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Futura Medical Developments Ltd.lead
- Parexelcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
PAREXEL EPCU Northwick Park
Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Development
- Organization
- Futura Medical Developments Limited
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Annelize Koch, MBChB
PAREXEL Ltd.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2016
First Posted
January 28, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 27, 2021
Results First Posted
September 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share