NCT02664714

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate if the training of pelvic floor muscles, which associates an individualized treatment progressing to a group treatment, would be more effective than an individualized training only or groups only. Methods: Randomized controlled study which will be done from January to December of 2016, on Laboratory of Women's Health Research, Federal University of São Carlos-SP, Brazil. Inclusion criteria: women with stress UI, older than 18 years old. The sample size calculation was performed using the GPower Software (3.1.5, Germany) and it was estimated a sample of 30 women in each group. The volunteers will be assessed before the intervention by a urinary symptoms evaluation form, King's Health Questionnaire, miccional diary, PERFECT scheme and perineometry. After the evaluation will be performed the randomization of the volunteers by a blinded investigator and the volunteers will be allocated into three groups: Group 1: Individualized Training Group 2: Individualized training with progression to group training Group 3: Group training only For all groups it will be used the same protocol that was prepared according to the recommendations of the American College of Sports Medicine. Later, volunteers will be reassessed after 12 treatments, three months and six months (from the discharge date). It will be added in the reassessment the Self-efficacy Scale for Pelvic Floor Exercises Practice. Primary outcome: severity measures of the King's Health Questionnaire. Secondary outcome: miccional diary, PERFECT scheme, perineometry and Self-efficacy scale for Pelvic Floor Exercises Practice. Data normality will be tested by the Shapiro-Wilk test (SPSS 19.0). The comparison between the evaluations will be performed by ANOVA, and the comparison between groups will be performed by Student t-test (independent measures). In order to measure the practical significance of the data, the effect size and the confidence interval (CI) will be calculated. A 5% significance level will be assumed. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos- SP, Brazil (Protocol 1207393).

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 16, 2015

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2016

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 27, 2016

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

January 27, 2016

Status Verified

January 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

December 16, 2015

Last Update Submit

January 22, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

physiotherapy, perineometer, adherence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • severity measures of the King's Health Questionnaire

    In the first assessment volunteers will answer the King's Health Questionnaire

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • mictional diary, PERFECT scheme, perineometry and Self-efficacy scale for Pelvic Floor Exercises Practice

    6 months

Study Arms (3)

PFMT Individualized

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

12 Individualized pelvic floor muscle training:FAST CONTRACTIONS(repetitions) weeks 1(5x),2(10x),3(15x), 4(20x),5(30x),6(40x) 7-12(50x)SUSTAINED CONTRACTIONSNumber of series:weeks: 1 and 2(2), 3-6(3), 7-12(4)Repetitions:week 1(6) week 2(8), weeks 3-12 (10)Sustained contraction time/Resting time: weeks 1(2s/4s),2(3s/6s), 3(4s/8s) 4(5s/10s), 5(5s/5s), 6(5s/5s), 7(6s/6s),8(6s/6s), 9(8s/8s) 10(8s/8s), 11(10s/10s),12(10s/10s)

Other: PFMT

PFMT individualized with group

EXPERIMENTAL

12 Individualized pelvic floor muscle training:FAST CONTRACTIONS(repetitions) weeks 1(5x),2(10x),3(15x), 4(20x),5(30x),6(40x) 7-12(50x)SUSTAINED CONTRACTIONSNumber of series:weeks: 1 and 2(2), 3-6(3), 7-12(4)Repetitions:week 1(6) week 2(8), weeks 3-12 (10)Sustained contraction time/Resting time: weeks 1(2s/4s),2(3s/6s), 3(4s/8s)

Other: PFMT

12 group PFMT

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

12 Individualized pelvic floor muscle training:FAST CONTRACTIONS(repetitions) weeks 1(5x),2(10x),3(15x), 4(20x),5(30x),6(40x) 7-12(50x)SUSTAINED CONTRACTIONSNumber of series:weeks: 1 and 2(2), 3-6(3), 7-12(4)Repetitions:week 1(6) week 2(8), weeks 3-12 (10)Sustained contraction time/Resting time: weeks 1(2s/4s),2(3s/6s), 3(4s/8s)

Other: PFMT

Interventions

PFMTOTHER

Participating volunteers of all groups will receive guidance about the anatomy and function of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) and how to perform a properly contraction: as strong as possible and eliminating at the most the contraction of the gluteus, abdominals and adductors. For all groups it will be used the same protocol which was developed for this study, with progression parameters of the PFMT based on the recommendations for the strength training of the American College of Sports Medicine (VICKI, 2001).

Also known as: pelvic floor muscles training
12 group PFMTPFMT IndividualizedPFMT individualized with group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • women from the age of 18 years old who present urinary incontinence stress

You may not qualify if:

  • urge urinary incontinence (UUI) in an isolated form, neuromuscular diseases, other diseases (asthma, tumors, heart failure, absence of pelvic floor muscle contraction (grade 0) verified by modified Oxford scale, urinary infection, difficulty in understanding the study procedures, uncontrolled hypertension, presence of severe prolapse (visible prolapse in the vaginal opening), women with UI who have done physical therapy in the last 12 months, pregnancy,puerperium.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • BØ K, LARSEN S, OSEID S, et al. Knowledge about and ability to correct pelvic floor muscle exercises in women with urinary stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 1988;7:261-262. BØ K, TALSETH T, VINSNES A: Randomized controlled trial on the effect of pelvic floor muscle training on the quality of life and sexual problems in genuine stress incontinent women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 79:598-603, 2000. BO K, SHERBURN M. Evaluation of female pelvic-floor muscle function and strength. Phys Ther; 85 (3): 269 -82, 2005. BØ, K. AND HILDE, G. Does it work in the long term?-A systematic review on pelvic floor muscle training for female stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol. Urodyn., 32: 215-223, 2013. BORELLO-FRANCE DF, ZYCZYNSKI HM, DOWNEY PA, RAUSE CR, WISLER JA. Effect of pelvic floor muscles exercise position on continence and quality of life outcomes in women with stress urinary incontinence.Phys Ther. 86:974-86, 2006.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hay-Smith EJC, Starzec-Proserpio M, Moller B, Aldabe D, Cacciari L, Pitangui ACR, Vesentini G, Woodley SJ, Dumoulin C, Frawley HC, Jorge CH, Morin M, Wallace SA, Weatherall M. Comparisons of approaches to pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD009508. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009508.pub2.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urinary IncontinenceUrination DisordersUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Vilena F Xavier

    Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia - UFSCar

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Vilena F Xavier

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Clinical Research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2015

First Posted

January 27, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

January 27, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-01